Texas Administrative Code
Title 19 - EDUCATION
Part 2 - TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY
Chapter 89 - ADAPTATIONS FOR SPECIAL POPULATIONS
Subchapter AA - COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES
Division 7 - DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Section 89.1175 - Representation in Special Education Due Process Hearings

Universal Citation: 19 TX Admin Code § 89.1175

Current through Reg. 49, No. 52; December 27, 2024

(a) A party to a due process hearing may represent himself or herself or be represented by:

(1) an attorney who is licensed in the State of Texas; or

(2) an individual who is not an attorney licensed in the State of Texas but who has special knowledge or training with respect to problems of children with disabilities and who satisfies the qualifications of this section.

(b) A party who wishes to be represented by an individual who is not an attorney licensed in the State of Texas must file a written authorization with the hearing officer promptly after filing the request for a due process hearing or promptly after retaining the services of the non-attorney representative. The party must forward a copy of the written authorization to the opposing party at the same time that the written authorization is filed with the hearing officer.

Attached Graphic

(d) The written authorization must include the non-attorney representative's name and contact information and a description of the non-attorney representative's:

(1) special knowledge or training with respect to problems of children with disabilities;

(2) knowledge of the rules and procedures that apply to due process hearings, including those in 34 Code of Federal Regulations, §§300.507-300.515 and 300.532, if applicable, and this division;

(3) knowledge of federal and state special education laws, regulations, and rules; and

(4) educational background.

(e) The written authorization must state the party's acknowledgment of the following:

(1) the non-attorney representative has been given full authority to act on the party's behalf with respect to the hearing;

(2) the actions or omissions by the non-attorney representative are binding on the party, as if the party had taken or omitted those actions directly;

(3) documents are deemed to be served on the party if served on the non-attorney representative;

(4) communications between the party and a non-attorney representative are not generally protected by the attorney-client privilege and may be subject to disclosure during the hearing proceeding;

(5) neither federal nor state special education laws provide for the recovery of fees for the services of a non-attorney representative; and

(6) it is the party's responsibility to notify the hearing officer and the opposing party of any change in the status of the authorization and that the provisions of the authorization will remain in effect until the party notifies the hearing officer and the opposing party of the party's revocation of the authorization.

(f) If the non-attorney representative receives monetary compensation in exchange for representing the party in the due process hearing, the written authorization must affirm the following:

(1) the non-attorney representative has agreed to abide by a voluntary code of ethics and professional conduct during the period of representation; and

(2) the non-attorney representative and the party have entered into a confidential, written representation agreement that includes a process for resolving any disputes that may arise between the non-attorney representative and the party.

(g) The written authorization must be signed and dated by the party.

(h) An individual is prohibited from being a party's representative under subsection (a)(2) of this section if the individual has prior employment experience with the school district and the school district raises an objection to the individual serving as a representative based on the individual's prior employment experience. No other objections to a party's representation by a non-attorney are permitted under this section.

(i) Upon receipt of a written authorization filed under this section, the hearing officer must promptly determine whether the non-attorney representative is qualified and meets the requirements to represent the party in the hearing and must notify the parties in writing of the determination. A hearing officer's determination is final and not subject to review or appeal.

(j) A non-attorney representative may not file pleadings or other documents on behalf of a party, present statements and arguments on behalf of a party, examine and cross-examine witnesses, offer and introduce evidence, object to the introduction of evidence and testimony, or engage in other activities in a representative capacity unless the hearing officer has reviewed a written authorization filed under this section and determined that the non-attorney representative is qualified to represent the party in the hearing.

(k) In accordance with the Texas Education Code, § 38.022, a school district may require an attorney or a non-attorney representative who enters a school campus to display his or her driver's license or another form of government-issued identification. A school district may also verify whether the representative is a registered sex offender and may apply a policy adopted by its board of trustees regarding the action to be taken when a visitor to a school campus is identified as a sex offender.

Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Texas may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.