Texas Administrative Code
Title 19 - EDUCATION
Part 2 - TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY
Chapter 157 - HEARINGS AND APPEALS
Subchapter EE - INFORMAL REVIEW, FORMAL REVIEW, AND REVIEW BY STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
Division 3 - STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE REVIEW
Section 157.1157 - Standard of Review

Universal Citation: 19 TX Admin Code § 157.1157

Current through Reg. 49, No. 38; September 20, 2024

(a) In response to a challenge to a commissioner of education decision under the Texas Education Code (TEC), § 39.152, the administrative law judge shall conduct a hearing to consider evidence and arguments regarding the decision. Based on the evidence and arguments presented, the administrative law judge shall review the commissioner's decision under the substantial evidence rule as provided by Government Code, § 2001.174 and § 2001.175, and judicial case precedents construing those provisions.

(b) The State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) may not substitute its judgment for the judgment of the commissioner on questions committed to the commissioner's discretion. Questions committed to the commissioner's discretion include, but are not limited to, the following:

(1) any questions arising under a statute, rule, or other legal standard that requires or permits the commissioner to make a decision within general legal guidelines that do not mandate a specific result under the circumstances; and

(2) the execution of any act authorized or required to be taken by the commissioner.

(c) The SOAH may not substitute its judgment for the judgment of the commissioner on the weight to be assigned the evidence before the commissioner.

(d) The SOAH may affirm the commissioner decision in whole or in part.

(e) The SOAH shall reverse and remand the decision for further proceedings if substantial rights of the school district or open-enrollment charter school have been prejudiced because the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions of the commissioner are:

(1) in violation of a statutory provision;

(2) in excess of the commissioner's authority;

(3) made through unlawful procedure;

(4) affected by other error of law;

(5) not reasonably supported by substantial evidence considering the reliable and probative evidence as a whole; or

(6) arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion.

(f) An order of remand may not direct or control the commissioner's exercise of discretion on a matter committed to the commissioner's discretion by § 157.1171(b) of this title (relating to Final Decision) and TEC, Chapter 39.

(g) On remand, the commissioner shall apply the facts and law as determined by the SOAH to reach a new decision in light of all the circumstances of the case.

(h) The commissioner shall continue on remand to exercise discretion over the accreditation decision as required by § 157.1171(b) of this title and TEC, Chapter 39.

Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Texas may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.