Current through Reg. 49, No. 38; September 20, 2024
(a) Applicability.
This section shall apply to all hearings and reviews of actions taken under
Texas Education Code (TEC), §29.022, concerning denials of requests for
the installation of cameras, denials of requests to view a video, denials of
requests to release a video, and requests of a school district for an extension
of time for the installation of cameras. This section applies to constructive
denials of requests, which occur when a school district fails to timely issue a
denial of a request. To the extent that this section conflicts with any other
sections governing hearings before the commissioner of education, including
Chapter 157, Subchapter AA of this title (relating to General Provisions for
Hearings Before the Commissioner of Education) and Subchapter BB of this title
(relating to Specific Appeals to the Commissioner), this section shall
prevail.
(b) Denial of request. The
following standards and procedures apply to a denial of a request made under
TEC, §
29.022(a),
for the placement of a video camera or to the denial of a request to release a
video or to view a video made under TEC, §
29.022(i) or
(l)(2).
(1)
Once a request for placement of a video camera or a request to release a video
is administratively denied, the requestor must exhaust administrative remedies
through the school district's grievance process even if the requestor opts for
the expedited review process. However, a school district, parent, staff member,
or administrator may request an expedited review even before local remedies are
exhausted.
(2) After local remedies
are exhausted by filing a grievance with the school board and obtaining a
school board determination, the requestor may appeal the denial to the
commissioner of education under TEC, §
7.057, by filing a
petition for review.
(3) In a case
where there is a denial of a request for the placement of a video camera, the
commissioner will determine whether the person requesting placement is a person
allowed to request placement under TEC, §
29.022(a-1),
and whether the requestor made a proper request under TEC, §
29.022(a-3).
(4) The commissioner will not consider the
cost to the district of installing cameras or releasing a video.
(5) In a case where there is a denial of a
request to release a video, the commissioner will determine whether the
requestor is a person allowed to receive a video under TEC, §
29.022(i).
The commissioner may make an in-camera inspection of the video in question in
the appropriate case.
(6) The
following timelines are established for filing a petition for review.
(A) A petition for review shall be filed with
the commissioner within 10 calendar days of the decision of the board of
trustees denying the request being first communicated to the requestor or
requestor's counsel, whichever occurs first. The petition for review shall be
made in accordance with §
157.1073(c) of
this title (Relating to Hearings Brought Under Texas Education Code, §
7.057) and may include
a request for expedited review.
(B)
The district's answer and local record shall comply with §
157.1052(b) and
(c) of this title (relating to Answers) and
§
157.1073(d) of
this title and shall be filed with the commissioner within 10 calendar days of
the school district receiving notification from the commissioner of the
appeal.
(C) The procedures
specified in §§157.1059; 157.1061; and 157.1073(e)-(h), (j), and (k)
of this title apply to a case brought to the commissioner under this
section.
(7) A request
for expedited review is governed by the following.
(A) The expedited review process is designed
to allow a requestor to promptly receive a preliminary judgment from the
commissioner as to a decision to deny a request for the installation of cameras
or a decision to deny a request to release a video while at the same time
respecting the school grievance process. The expedited review process does not
apply to a request to only view a video. Invoking the expedited review process
results in a prompt initial determination. However, the final commissioner's
determination is to be based on a substantial evidence review of the school
district's grievance record. This allows for a full record to be developed at
the school district level and does not require the requestor and the school
district to make an evidentiary record before the Texas Education Agency (TEA)
in Austin, Texas. Because the requirements of TEC, §
7.057, are met when
the school board's decision is heard by the commissioner, an appeal to district
court is allowed under TEC, §
7.057(d).
TEC, §
29.022, does not by
itself allow an appeal to district court.
(B) A school district, parent, staff member,
or administrator may request an expedited review. Any request for an expedited
review shall include the names, telephone numbers, and addresses of all
interested parties to the request. "Interested parties" are all persons who
brought the grievance, all persons who have testified or provided written
statements as part of the grievance process, and the school district. The
request for expedited review shall specify whether the school district denied a
request for the placement of a video camera or the school district denied a
request to release a video and briefly describe why that decision is either
correct or incorrect.
(C) A request
for expedited review shall be filed with the commissioner no earlier than 14
business days after a request for placement of a video camera or a request to
release a video is administratively denied under TEC, §
29.022(i) or
(l)(2), and no later than the fifth business
day after a school board resolves a grievance as to a request for placement of
a video camera or a request to release a video. A request for expedited review
shall be filed with the commissioner electronically as provided on the
division's website or by U.S. mail, facsimile, hand delivery, or a commercial
delivery service.
(D) Whenever an
interested party files a document with the commissioner, with the exception of
the request for expedited review, the interested party shall send the same
document to all other interested parties by the same method that the document
was sent to the commissioner. Hand-delivery of the document by the next day may
be substituted for service by facsimile delivery.
(E) If a request for expedited review is
timely filed, the commissioner will establish a briefing schedule and will send
to all interested parties a notice that an expedited review has been filed,
which will include relevant statutes and rules. Any interested party who knows
of any additional interested parties who have not been notified will promptly
inform the commissioner in writing.
(F) All briefing shall clearly state the
facts relied upon. Documents relevant to the issues presented may be attached
to a brief. All briefing shall provide the reasons why the commissioner should
or should not grant the request for expedited review. Citations to statutes,
rules, commissioner decisions, and caselaw are important to identify the legal
basis for the claims made.
(G) All
interested parties who are in favor of granting the request for expedited
review shall file briefing at the time specified for the requestor of the
expedited review.
(H) All
interested parties who are opposed to granting the request for expedited review
shall file briefing at the same time.
(I) Briefing is not limited to the issues
specifically raised in the pleadings in the case. However, no new arguments may
be raised in the reply briefs. Reply briefs may contain new citations to the
record and legal authority as to issues previously raised.
(J) A preliminary judgment shall be issued
based on the briefing of the interested parties. The preliminary judgment will
be sent to the requestor, the school district, and all interested parties. If
it is determined that a school district is not likely to prevail on the issue
of a request for the placement of video cameras or the issue of a request to
view a video under full review, the school district will fully comply with TEC,
§
29.022.
(K) After a preliminary judgment is made, a
final judgment will be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in
paragraphs (1)-(5) of this subsection.
(c) Extension of time. A request by a school
district for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera
under TEC, §
29.022, shall be made
and decided using the following procedures.
(1) Any request by a school district for an
extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera shall be filed with
the commissioner prior to the 45th school business day after a request to begin
operating a video camera is received. However, a school district should request
an extension of time as soon as it determines that an extension of time should
be filed.
(2) A request for an
extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera shall specify why an
extension of time should be granted. The request shall include affidavits
supporting any factual claims made in the request and reference any legal
authority as to why the request should be granted. The request may include a
request for expedited review. The request shall name the individual who
requested the installation of cameras and provide the individual's address and
telephone number. Immediately following the individual's address and telephone
number there shall appear in bold type: "You have been identified as the
individual who requested the operation of a video camera that is the subject of
this request to the commissioner of education to extend the statutory timeline.
You may, but are not required to, participate in the proceedings before the
commissioner concerning the school district's request for an extension of time.
It is entirely up to you whether and to what extent you wish to participate in
these proceedings. The procedures governing these proceedings are found at 19
Texas Administrative Code §
103.1303(c) and
Texas Education Code, §
29.022."
(3) A request for an extension of time to
begin the operation of a video camera shall list the names, telephone numbers,
and addresses of all interested parties to the request. All interested parties
include all parents of students in the classroom or other special education
setting for which a video camera has been requested and all staff who provided
services in a classroom for which a video camera has been requested.
(4) All documents in a case shall be filed
with the Division of Hearings and Appeals, Texas Education Agency, 1701 North
Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701, facsimile number (512) 475-3662.
Documents shall be filed electronically as provided on the division's website
or by mail, delivery, or facsimile. All documents must be actually received by
the Division of Hearings and Appeals by the date specified in this section. The
mailbox rule does not apply to filings in a case filed under this subsection.
Electronic filing is strongly encouraged.
(5) All filings in a case shall be sent to
the school district, the individual who initially requested the installation of
the cameras, and all interested parties who have filed a request to receive
documents filed in the case by the same method as the request is filed with the
commissioner. Due to the requirements of the Family Educational Rights and
Privacy Act of 1974, the names, telephone numbers, and addresses of parents and
other publicly identifiable student information may not be given to the
interested parties. The copies of the filings sent to interested parties shall
be redacted to remove all personally identifiable student
information.
(6) Any response to a
request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera shall
be filed with the commissioner by an interested party within 10 calendar days
of the filing of the request. If no response to the request is timely filed,
the commissioner shall issue a final decision within 20 calendar days of the
filing of the request.
(7) A
response to a request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a
video camera shall specify why an extension of time should or should not be
granted. The response shall include affidavits concerning any factual claims
made in the request and reference any legal authority as to why the request
should or should not be granted. The response may include a request for
expedited review.
(8) A request for
expedited review must be filed with the commissioner within 10 calendar days of
the filing of the request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a
video camera. If a request for expedited review is made, all interested parties
shall be notified that they have been identified as interested parties in the
request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera. In
particular, the interested parties will be informed that it is their choice
whether to participate in the proceedings before the commissioner, that it is
entirely up to them to determine to what extent they wish to participate in the
proceedings, that the procedures governing these proceedings are found in this
subsection and TEC, §
29.022, and that upon
their written request filed with the commissioner they will be sent all filings
in this case.
(9) If a request for
an expedited review is not made, the commissioner shall issue a final decision
within 45 calendar days of the filing of the request for an extension of time
to begin the operation of a video camera, unless the commissioner determines
that an evidentiary hearing would be helpful in deciding the issues raised. If
the commissioner decides to hold an evidentiary hearing, the commissioner shall
establish the timelines and procedures to be used. Whether to conduct the
hearing by telephone or other electronic methods will be considered.
(10) If a request for expedited review is
made, the following procedures shall be followed.
(A) Any reply by the school district to any
response to the request shall be filed with the commissioner within 25 calendar
days of the filing of the request for an extension of time to begin the
operation of a video camera.
(B) A
preliminary judgment shall be made by the commissioner within 35 calendar days
of the filing of the request for an extension of time to begin the operation of
a video camera.
(C) Any interested
party or the school district may file objections to the preliminary judgment
within 40 calendar days of the filing of the request for an extension of time
to begin the operation of a video camera.
(D) Any reply to an objection to a
preliminary judgment must be filed within 45 calendar days of the filing of a
request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video
camera.
(E) The commissioner shall
issue a final decision within 55 calendar days of the filing of the request for
an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera, unless the
commissioner determines that an evidentiary hearing would be helpful in
deciding the issues raised. If the commissioner decides to hold an evidentiary
hearing, the commissioner shall establish the timelines and procedures to be
used. Whether to conduct the hearing by telephone or other electronic methods
will be considered.
(11)
In making either a preliminary judgment or a final judgment under this
subsection, the commissioner will consider whether granting the requested
extension is reasonable considering all factors, including contracting
statutes, architectural and structural issues, and the difference in costs to
the district if a moderate extension of time is granted.
(12) A commissioner's final decision under
this subsection is not subject to appeal.