Texas Administrative Code
Title 16 - ECONOMIC REGULATION
Part 2 - PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS
Chapter 26 - SUBSTANTIVE RULES APPLICABLE TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS
Subchapter J - COSTS, RATES AND TARIFFS
Section 26.211 - Rate-Setting Flexibility for Services Subject to Significant Competitive Challenges

Universal Citation: 16 TX Admin Code § 26.211

Current through Reg. 50, No. 13; March 28, 2025

(a) Application. The provisions of this section apply to an incumbent local exchange company (ILEC) . This section does not apply to a deregulated company holding a certificate of operating authority or to an exempt carrier under PURA §52.154.

(b) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish procedures for pricing flexibility for services subject to competition and a process for commission review of pricing flexibility applications.

(1) Eligible services. An ILEC may request the types of pricing flexibility established by this subsection.

(A) Banded rates. If an ILEC is granted the authority to charge banded rates, the minimum rates must yield revenues that are equal to or greater than 105% of the long run incremental cost of the service in the geographic market in which the service will be provided.

(i) When an ILEC is granted the authority to charge banded rates, the ILEC must file a tariff showing the minimum and maximum rates and specifying its current rate. The current rate specified in the ILEC's tariff must be applied uniformly to all customers of the service in each exchange for which the commission has approved banded rates.

(ii) If the ILEC desires to charge a rate different from its current rate, but between the minimum and maximum rates, it must file a revised tariff on or before the effective date of the rate change.

(iii) The minimum and maximum rates may only be changed as provided for in the Public Utility Regulatory Act, Chapter 53, Subchapters C and D, or G.

(B) Detariffing. If an ILEC is granted the authority to detariff a service, the ILEC must maintain at the commission a current price list for the service, and the commission must retain authority to regulate the quality, terms and conditions of the detariffed service, other than rates. The commission may determine the appropriate ratemaking treatment of any revenues from or costs of providing a detariffed service in a proceeding under the Public Utility Regulatory Act, Chapter 53, Subchapters C and D, or G.

(C) Other types of pricing flexibility. If an ILEC is granted the authority to engage in a type of pricing flexibility that the commission finds to be in the public interest other than those specified in subparagraphs (A)-(B) of this paragraph, that pricing flexibility must be offered under such terms and conditions as the commission orders.

(2) Other services. ILECs have the authority to enter into customer-specific contracts for those services specified in subsection (d) of this section. For those services, ILECs may apply for pricing flexibility for the services specified in paragraph (1) of this subsection, other than customer-specific contracts. For other services, ILECs may apply to the commission in accordance with this subsection to obtain any type of pricing flexibility specified in paragraph (1) of this subsection. Nothing in this subsection permits an ILEC to:

(A) obtain pricing flexibility for basic local telecommunications service, including local measured service, or for any service that includes as a component a service not subject to significant competitive challenge; or

(B) enter into customer-specific contracts or to obtain detariffing with respect to message telecommunications services, switched access services, or wide area telecommunications service.

(3) Requirements for application. An application for pricing flexibility filed under this paragraph must :

(A) include a statement of the ILEC's intention to use the procedures established in this subsection;

(B) specify the type of pricing flexibility requested and, if the type of pricing flexibility requested is either banded rates or some other type of pricing flexibility in accordance with paragraph (1)(C) of this subsection that involves rate-setting;

(i) state the proposed rates, and if the type of pricing flexibility is banded rates, state the maximum and minimum rates;

(ii) include detailed documentation demonstrating that the minimum rates yield revenues that are equal to or greater than 105% of the long run incremental cost of the service in the geographic market in which the service will be provided;

(iii) demonstrate that the rates are not unreasonably preferential, prejudicial or discriminatory;

(iv) demonstrate that the rates are such that the service identified in accordance with subparagraph (C) of this paragraph will not be subsidized directly or indirectly by regulated monopoly services; and

(v) demonstrate that the rates are not predatory or anticompetitive;

(C) identify the service for which the ILEC is requesting pricing flexibility, including each component of the service, and provide functional and technical descriptions of the service, including:

(i) the functions that the service is intended to perform for the customer;

(ii) the types of equipment used to provide the service (including, but not limited to, transmission facilities, switching facilities, customer equipment, software functions, and protocol);

(iii) the network configurations used to provide the service; and

(iv) schematics;

(D) identify each service that is not subject to significant competitive challenge but that, at the time the ILEC files its application for pricing flexibility, the ILEC intends to provide as a tariffed adjunct to the service identified in subparagraph (C) of this paragraph and, for each such service, provide:

(i) functional and technical descriptions; and

(ii) citations to the tariff provisions under which each such service will be provided;

(E) designate each exchange as to which the ILEC is seeking pricing flexibility;

(F) include a map or maps of each exchange designated in accordance with subparagraph (E) of this paragraph that can be coordinated with the official commission boundary maps;

(G) describe the products or services known to the ILEC that are currently available in each exchange designated in accordance with subparagraph (E) of this paragraph, and that are the same, equivalent, or substitutable for the service identified in accordance with subparagraph (C) of this paragraph, and identify the providers of those products or services;

(H) with respect to the products or services described in accordance with subparagraph (G) of this paragraph, discuss:

(i) the number and size of telecommunications utilities or other persons providing such products or services;

(ii) the extent to which such products or services are available;

(iii) the ability of customers to obtain such products or services at rates, terms, and conditions comparable to those that the ILEC will offer;

(iv) the ability of telecommunications utilities or other persons to make such products or services readily available at rates, terms, and conditions comparable to those that the ILEC will offer; and

(v) the existence of any significant barrier to the entry or exit of a provider of such products or services;

(I) demonstrate that the level of competition with respect to all components of the ILEC's service identified in accordance with subparagraph (C) of this paragraph represents a significant competitive challenge within each exchange designated in accordance with subparagraph (E) of this paragraph that warrants the pricing flexibility specified in accordance with subparagraph (B) of this paragraph;

(J) demonstrate that the service identified in accordance with subparagraph (C) of this paragraph is not basic local telecommunications service, including local measured service;

(K) if the type of pricing flexibility requested in accordance with subparagraph (B) of this paragraph is customer-specific pricing or detariffing, demonstrate that the service identified in accordance with subparagraph (C) of this paragraph is not message telecommunications service, switched access service, or wide area telecommunications service;

(L) to prevent the subsidization of the service identified in accordance with subparagraph (C) of this paragraph with revenues from regulated monopoly services, propose mechanisms to recover costs that may not be identified and recovered in a long run incremental cost study, including but not limited to costs associated with advertising, unsuccessful bids, and all items of plant used in the provision of the service;

(M) identify and address the impact that approval of the application for pricing flexibility may have on universal service;

(N) for any type of pricing flexibility other than detariffing, include proposed tariffs and identify any tariff language that restricts the resale, sharing, or joint use of the service identified in accordance with subparagraph (C) of this paragraph and any component of the service and demonstrate why such restrictive tariff language is consistent with the policy established in the Public Utility Regulatory Act §52.001; and

(O) include any other information that the ILEC wants considered in connection with the review of its application.

(4) Tier 1 LECs. The commission will allow an incumbent LEC that is not a Tier 1 LEC as of September 1, 1995, at that company's option, to adopt the cost studies approved by the commission for a Tier 1 LEC.

(5) Notice filing. An ILEC may, in accordance with § 26.227 of this title (relating to Procedures Applicable to Nonbasic Services and Pricing Flexibility for Basic and Nonbasic Services for Chapter 58 Electing Companies.), submit an informational notice filing to introduce a service or exercise pricing flexibility to which this section applies. An informational notice filing must also comply with § 26.228 of this title (relating to Requirements Applicable to Pricing Flexibility for Chapter 58 Electing Companies) or § 26.229 of this title (relating to Requirements Applicable to Chapter 52 Companies) as applicable.

(6) Review of competition outside exchange. For ILECs with less than 31,000 access lines, the presiding officer will not be limited under paragraph (7)(D)(i)-(x) of this subsection to considering only competition within each exchange where the ILEC will provide the service. In accordance with paragraph (3)(O) of this subsection, an ILEC with less than 31,000 access lines may provide information that addresses the criteria of paragraph (3)(G)-(I) of this subsection with respect to products or services available outside each exchange designated in paragraph (3)(E) of this subsection.

(7) Application requirements. An application for pricing flexibility will be approved if, after commission review the commission determines that:

(A) no service for which pricing flexibility is sought is basic local telecommunications service, including local measured service;

(B) no service for which the ILEC requests detariffing of rates is message telecommunications service, switched access service, or wide area telecommunications service

(C) no service for which pricing flexibility is sought includes a component that is not subject to significant competitive challenge;

(D) the grant of pricing flexibility for the service identified in accordance with paragraph (3)(C) of this subsection within each designated in accordance with paragraph (3)(E) of this subsection is appropriate to allow the ILEC to respond to a significant competitive challenge, based upon consideration of the following:

(i) the number and size of telecommunications utilities or other persons providing the same, equivalent, or substitutable service within each exchange designated in accordance with paragraph (3)(E) of this subsection;

(ii) the extent to which the same, equivalent, or substitutable service is available within each exchange designated in accordance with paragraph (3)(E) of this subsection;

(iii) the ability of customers to obtain the same, equivalent, or substitutable services at comparable rates, terms, and conditions within each exchange designated in accordance with paragraph (3)(E) of this subsection;

(iv) the ability of telecommunications utilities or other persons to make the same, equivalent, or substitutable service readily available at comparable rates, terms, and conditions within each exchange designated in accordance with paragraph (3)(E) of this subsection;

(v) the existence of any significant barrier to the entry or exit of a provider of the same, equivalent or substitutable services within each designated in accordance with paragraph (3)(E) of this subsection;

(vi) whether there are mechanisms to minimize potential anti-competitive practices, to the extent that any such practice has been identified in the record;

(vii) whether there are mechanisms to prevent the subsidization of the service with revenues from regulated monopoly services;

(viii) whether the ability of the ILEC to flexibly price the service within each designated exchange would have any significant impact on universal service;

(ix) whether the type of pricing flexibility requested is appropriate in light of the level and nature of competition within each exchange where the ILEC will provide the service; and

(x) any other relevant information contained in the record;

(E) the rates, if the type of pricing flexibility granted is either banded rates or some other type of pricing flexibility in accordance with paragraph (1)(C) of this subsection that involves rate-setting, are just and reasonable and:

(i) yield revenues that are equal to or greater than 105% of the long run incremental cost of the service in the geographic market in which the service will be provided;

(ii) are not unreasonably preferential, prejudicial or discriminatory;

(iii) are such that the service will not be subsidized directly or indirectly by regulated monopoly services; and

(iv) are not predatory or anticompetitive.

(8) Alternative relief. Nothing in this subsection prevents the presiding officer from approving relief other than that requested in the application.

(d) Customer-specific contracts. An ILEC may enter into customer-specific contracts for:

(1) central office based PBX-type services for systems of 200 stations or more, as those services compete with customer premises equipment provided by PBX vendors;

(2) billing and collection services;

(3) high-speed private line services of 1.544 megabits or greater;

(4) customized services that are unique because of size or configuration, provided that such customized services do not include basic local telecommunications service, including local measured service, or message telecommunications services, switched access services, or wide area telecommunications service; and

(5) any other service for which the commission has authorized the ILEC to enter into customer- specific contracts in accordance with this section.

(e) Subsequent review. The commission may modify, or revoke, upon notice and hearing, the authorization of any type or types of pricing flexibility granted in accordance with this section.

Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Texas may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.