Current through Reg. 50, No. 13; March 28, 2025
(a) Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this section, have the following
meanings, unless the context indicates otherwise.
(1) Exceedance tolerance--the maximum
acceptable percentage of simulations in which the modeled ERCOT system
experiences a loss of load event that exceeds the threshold for a given
criterion of the reliability standard.
(2) Loss of load event--an occurrence when
the system-wide firm load plus minimum operating reserves required to avoid an
energy emergency alert level three event is greater than the available resource
capacity to serve that load, resulting in involuntary load shed.
(3) Transmission operator--has the same
meaning as defined in the ERCOT protocols.
(4) Weatherization effectiveness--the assumed
percentage reduction in the amount of weather-related unplanned outages for
generation resources and energy storage resources included in the model, due to
compliance with the weatherization standards in §
25.55 of this title (relating to
Weather Emergency Preparedness).
(b) Reliability standard for the ERCOT
region. The bulk power system for the ERCOT region meets the reliability
standard if an ERCOT probability-based model simulation demonstrates that the
system meets each of the criteria provided in this subsection.
(1) Frequency. The expected loss of load
events for the ERCOT region must be equal to or less than one event per ten
years on average, i.e., 0.1 loss of load expectation (LOLE).
(2) Duration. The maximum expected length of
a loss of load event for the ERCOT region, measured in hours, must be less than
12 hours, with a 1.00 percent exceedance tolerance.
(3) Magnitude. The expected highest level of
load shed during a loss of load event for the ERCOT region, measured as the
average lost load for a given hour, must be less than the maximum number of
megawatts of load shed that can be safely rotated during a loss of load event,
as determined by ERCOT, in consultation with commission staff and the
transmission operators, with a 1.00 percent exceedance tolerance. Beginning in
2024, on or before December 1 of each year, ERCOT must file the maximum number
of megawatts of load shed that can be safely rotated during a loss of load
event and a summary of the methodology used to calculate this value.
(c) Reliability assessment.
Beginning January 1, 2026, ERCOT must initiate an assessment to determine
whether the bulk power system for the ERCOT region is meeting the reliability
standard and is likely to continue to meet the reliability standard for the
three years following the date of assessment. The assessment must be conducted
at least once every three years.
(1) Modeling
assumptions.
(A) Before conducting the
assessment, ERCOT must file a comprehensive list of proposed modeling
assumptions to be used in the reliability assessment. The proposed assumptions
must include:
(i) the number of historic
weather years that will be included in the modeling;
(ii) the amount of new resources and
retirements, in megawatts, listed by resource type;
(iii) the weatherization effectiveness;
and
(iv) any other assumptions that
would impact the modeling results, along with an explanation of the possible
impact of the additional assumptions.
(B) Commission staff will provide interested
persons with at least 30 days from the date ERCOT files its proposed modeling
assumptions to file comments recommending modifications to ERCOT's proposed
modeling assumptions. Commission staff may include filing requirements or
additional questions for comment.
(C) After reviewing filed comments, ERCOT, in
consultation with commission staff, must file its final recommended modeling
assumptions for commission review. Commission staff may provide a separate
recommendation on ERCOT's final recommended modeling assumptions for the
commission's consideration.
(2) Assessment components.
(A) ERCOT's assessment must include review
and analysis of the resource fleet, loads, and other system characteristics for
the ERCOT region for the following points in time:
(i) the current year's system configuration;
and
(ii) the expected system
configuration three years from the date of the current year's system
analysis.
(B) The
assessment results must include, at a minimum, the following metrics for each
point in time:
(ii) the probability of a loss of load event
exceeding the duration threshold established in subsection (b)(2) of this
section;
(iii) the probability of a
loss of load event exceeding the magnitude threshold established in subsection
(b)(3) of this section;
(iv) the
expected unserved energy; and
(v)
the normalized expected unserved energy.
(3) Commission review and determination.
(A) ERCOT must file its assessment with the
commission, including any information required under subparagraph (C)(i) of
this paragraph.
(B) Commission
staff will provide interested persons with at least 30 days from the date ERCOT
files its assessment to file comments on ERCOT's assessment. Commission staff
may include filing requirements or additional questions for comment.
(C) If the assessment shows that any reviewed
system fails to meet the reliability standard described in subsection (b) of
this section:
(i) ERCOT must provide the
commission with a summary explanation of any identified deficiencies and its
supporting analysis. ERCOT must also provide the commission with a menu of
proposed recommended market design changes, including a primary recommendation,
that are intended to address the identified deficiencies. ERCOT must provide
the commission with the expected system costs associated with each of its
proposed recommended changes;
(ii)
the independent market monitor must conduct an independent review of ERCOT's
proposed recommended market design changes, including associated expected
system costs for each proposed recommended change, and file its review no later
than the deadline established in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph;
and
(iii) commission staff must
provide a recommendation to the commission, considering expected system costs
and reliability benefits, on whether any market design changes or other changes
may be necessary to address the deficiency.
(D) The commission will review ERCOT's
assessment and any recommendations, the independent market monitor's review,
commission staff's recommendations, and stakeholder comments to determine
whether any market design changes may be necessary.