Current through Reg. 49, No. 38; September 20, 2024
(a) Criteria. The
addition of new Historic Sites will follow the "State Historic Sites Historic
Properties Collection Plan" in a three-step process as posted on the Texas
Historical Commission's (Commission) website at thc.texas.gov detailing themes
and subthemes in Texas history, site assessment, operational and managerial
evaluations processes and the following criteria:
(1) The property must have recognized
statewide or national significance based on the standards of the National
Register of Historic Places.
(2)
The property should be able to provide interpretation of a significant theme or
event of Texas history that is not fully represented by the Commission's
existing historic sites or other historic sites accessible to the public. The
Commission will strive to maintain a geographic, cultural and thematic balance
in its program.
(3) The property
should have exceptional integrity of location (including surrounding
environment), design, material, setting, feeling, and association.
(4) The property should have appropriate
collections (objects, manuscript material, artifacts) associated with the
historic site or necessary artifacts related to the site's history and period
of significance should be identified and available.
(5) The property must be appropriate for use
as an interpretive museum or historic site, have high potential to attract and
accommodate diverse and new audiences, and be accessible to travelers as well
as to the local community.
(6) The
property must be available without restrictions that would limit the
Commission's options for preservation and interpretation as a historic site
(for example, a life estate retained by the grantor, restrictions against
future sale or conveyance, or limits on alterations deemed appropriate by the
Commission). The Commission encourages the use of easements or other
restrictions to ensure the preservation of historic sites.
(7) Financial resources must be available or
assured, including an endowment fund where appropriate, or sources of funding
must be identified in a comprehensive funding plan to ensure the restoration,
interpretation, development, long term operation and preservation of the
site.
(8) The property must have
the potential for strong supporting partnerships including community
support.
(b) Evaluation
Process. To evaluate the site against these criteria, the Commission will
follow a three-step process as follows.
(1) In
phase one, staff will determine if the property should be recommended to be
added to the Commission's portfolio of State Historic Sites. The preliminary
evaluation will briefly address the following issues:
(A) Where is the property located?
(B) What is the current condition of the
property?
(C) What improvements
would need to be made to meet THC standards for visitor access, experience, and
safety?
(D) What is the importance
of the property in Texas and/or American History?
(E) What is the estimation of the property's
value, strategically, operationally and culturally?
(F) Are there resources such as artifact
collections or endowment that accompany the property?
(G) Are there resources available to
adequately interpret the property's themes and stories to the public?
(H) Are the necessary resources available to
preserve and care for the property's physical infrastructure and
collections?
(I) Does THC have the
financial and FTE resources to operate the property?
(J) What is the property's potential for the
generation of sustainable visitation and revenue?
(2) Phase 2. If the property is recommended
for additional study, a staff committee will be assigned to conduct a
preliminary review of the property with reference to criteria noted in
subsection (a) of this section. The committee will make a recommendation to the
Commission whether to proceed with the development of a historic site
management plan in phase three of the evaluation process.
(3) Staff will obtain and use the following
information in phase two:
(A) A description of
the property, including land, structures and other features.
(B) A preliminary inventory of collections
and equipment.
(C) A statement of
significance or reference to its designation on the National Register of
Historic Places/National Historic Landmark and an evaluation of the site's
integrity.
(D) A statement from the
current owner indicating a willingness to transfer the real and relevant
personal property and the terms and conditions for such a transfer.
(E) Needed and available funding for
development costs and continuing operational costs.
(F) Letters of support from interested
parties, including an indication of willingness to create an appropriate
support group.
(G) A statement
identifying how the property would support the educational mission of the
Historic Sites Program to serve a broad and diverse audience.
(H) A preliminary estimate of the visitation
and costs for development and operation of the site.
(4) Phase 3. Upon positive action by the
Commission on the recommendation noted in paragraph (2) of this subsection, the
staff will prepare or have prepared a management plan in phase three for the
site's evaluation including:
(A) Evaluation of
the site, including but not limited to buildings, support facilities,
infrastructure (including roads, trails, utility service/water and sewer
systems), landscape features, and collections.
(B) Required staffing and services for
operation of the site, including ongoing costs of preservation, operation,
maintenance and marketing.
(C)
Preservation and facility development needs.
(D) Costs and timeline for making the
property available to the public.
(E) Required staffing and consultant services
for development of the site.
(F)
Projected audience/annual visitation, sources of funding to support programming
including community partnerships, potential earned revenue, philanthropic and
endowment.
(5) The
management plan will be reviewed by a panel of experts including an independent
Texas historian, museum professional, and expert in heritage tourism and their
recommendation will be taken into consideration by the Commission to determine
whether the property should be accepted.
(6) The decision to accept a site is within
the sole discretion of the Commission, including determining whether acceptance
of a property that meets all technical criteria is in the best interest of the
State.
(c) A property
that is adjacent to an existing THC State Historic Site that will enhance the
preservation, protection or interpretation of the existing site, or a property
that is needed to support the operations of the state historic site as a
program support facility, may be acquired by purchase or donation by action of
the Commission on recommendation of the Executive Director, without the
evaluation process described in subsection (b) of this section.
(d) A right of way or easement required to
allow for installation or connection of necessary utilities at a THC State
Historic Site between regular meetings of the Commission may be approved by the
Executive Director with the approval of the Chairman. This action will be
ratified at the next meeting of the Commission.