Texas Administrative Code
Title 10 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Part 1 - TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
Chapter 10 - UNIFORM MULTIFAMILY RULES
Subchapter F - COMPLIANCE MONITORING
Section 10.615 - Elections under IRC Section 42(g) and Additional Income and Rent Restrictions for HTC, Exchange, and TCAP Developments

Universal Citation: 10 TX Admin Code § 10.615

Current through Reg. 50, No. 13; March 28, 2025

(a) Under the Code, HTC Development Owners may elect 20% of the Units restricted at the 50% income and rent limits (20/50), 40% of the Units restricted at the 60% income and rent limits (40/60) or the average income minimum set aside. Many Developments have additional income and rent requirements (e.g., 30%, 40% and 50%) that are lower than or in addition to the election requirement. This requirement is referred to as "additional occupancy restrictions" and is reflected in the Development's LURA.

(b) A Development with additional rent and occupancy restrictions must maintain a waiting list for their lower rent restricted Units. The Development's waitlist policy must inform applicants and current residents of the availability of lower rent Units and the process for renting a lower rent Unit. Unless otherwise approved at Application, underwriting, and cost certification, all Unit sizes must be available at the lower rent limits. The waitlist policy for Developments with lower rent restricted Units must address how the waiting list for their lower rent restricted Units will be managed. The policy must not give a preference to prospective applicants over existing households. However, a Development may, but is not required to, prioritize existing households over prospective applicants.

(c) The Department will examine the actual gross rent (tenant portion of rent plus utility allowance plus any mandatory fees) and income levels of all households to determine if the additional income and rent requirements of the LURA are met. The Department will examine the actual gross rent and income of all households to determine if Developments that elected the average income minimum set aside have met the federal requirements and any lower additional occupancy restriction reflected in the Development's LURA.

(d) The Department will monitor the Available Unit Rule in the following manner for Developments that elected the average income minimum set aside:

(1) If the income of the household who, at the last certification, had an income and rent less than the 60% limits exceeds 140% of the 60% limit, the household must be redesignated as over income.

(2) If the income of a household with an income or rent above the 60% level and less than or equal to the 70% limits exceeds 140% of the 70% limit, the household must be designated as over income.

(3) If the income of a household with an income or rent above the 70% level and less than or equal to the 80% limits exceeds 140% of the 80% limit, the household must be designated as over income.

(4) Owners are not required to terminate the tenancy of over income households. When the Unit occupied by an over income household is vacated, it must be reoccupied by a household with an income and rent level equal to or less than the rent level of the household that went over income. In addition, the Unit must be reoccupied by a household that restores the low income average of the project to 60% or less.

(e) Units at 80% area median income and rent on HTC Developments. In certain years, the Department's Qualified Allocation Plan provided incentives to lease 10% of the Development's Market Rate Units to households at 80% income and rents. This section provides guidance for implementation. If the LURA requires 10% of the Market Rate Units be leased to households at 80% income and rent limits, the Owner must certify the 80% households at the time of move in only. Recertifications will not be required. Student rules do not apply to Units occupied by 80% households. Noncompliance with the requirement to lease to 80% households is not reportable to the IRS on IRS Form 8823 but will be cited as noncompliance under the event "Development failed to meet additional state required rent and occupancy restrictions."

(f) The Department does not require Developments to lease more Units under the additional occupancy restrictions than established in their LURA. However, if a Development inadvertently designates more households than required under the additional rent and occupancy restrictions, they may only decrease to the minimum number through attrition and new move ins, not by removing designations.

(g) Developments where 100% of the households pay rent equal to 30% of their adjusted income are not required to comply with subsection (b) of this section regarding wait lists for lower designated Units. In addition, Developments where 100% of the households pay rent equal to 30% of their adjusted income will not be required to change designations if the tenant portion of rent increases because of an increase in household income. Compliance will be evaluated without regard for how the owner designated the households on the Income Certification or the Unit Status Report. Instead, for Developments where 100% of the households pay rent equal to 30% of their adjusted income, compliance with additional rent and occupancy restrictions will be determined by a review of the actual incomes and rents charged.

Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Texas may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.