Current through Reg. 49, No. 38; September 20, 2024
(a) Introduction. This section implements the
provisions of Senate Bill 79, 73rd Texas Legislature, 1993, mandating selective
contracting for non-emergency inpatient hospital services.
(b) Definitions. The following words and
terms, when used in this section, shall have the following meanings, unless the
context clearly indicates otherwise.
(1)
Market area--A geographic subdivision of the State of Texas defined as a group
of geographically contiguous counties in which the Texas Department of Health
(department) determines that health care providers will be invited to apply for
selective contracting agreements. In general, each Metropolitan Statistical
Area (MSA) in the State will be considered for designation as a market area.
Where warranted by historical patient migration patterns, the department may
designate certain non-MSA counties that are geographically contiguous to an MSA
to be included with MSA counties within a market area.
(2) Effective service area--For each health
care provider in a market area, the geographic area, as defined on a zip code
basis, in which the health care provider has historically provided inpatient
hospital services to Medicaid patients. For purposes of subsections (f) and (g)
of this section, the effective service area will be determined based on
historical Medicaid inpatient claims data.
(3) Executive Oversight Committee--The
executive committee established by the department to direct the selective
contracting initiative.
(4)
Hospital capacity to provide specialized service offerings--
(A) For the LoneSTAR Select Contracting
Program I, the presence or absence of specific acute care hospital services,
including, but not limited to, trauma centers, burn units, neonatal intensive
care unit services, and psychiatric services, that are required to be available
in the market to ensure adequate access to quality care.
(B) For the LoneSTAR Select Contracting
Program II, the presence or absence of specific inpatient psychiatric services,
including, but not limited to, separate units for young children and
adolescents, separate psychiatric and substance abuse treatment services,
closed and open units, and distinct programs (e.g., dual diagnosis, eating
disorder) that may be required to be available in the market to ensure adequate
access to quality.
(5)
New facility--A health care provider facility substantially constructed after
the time the department determined the network of health care providers that
would be contracted under selective provider agreements. Such term shall not
include facilities that were built and operational at the time the department
determined the network of selective providers for the affected market area;
regardless of whether the facility's corporate structure and/or name have
changed due to merger, acquisition, or other corporate
reorganization.
(6) Potential
network--Any combination of applicant health care providers (whether the result
of a joint proposal or determined by the department) that offer a:
(A) combined effective service area that
provides geographic coverage of the market area to the same extent that
coverage is provided under current practice;
(B) combined service capacity equal to at
least:
(i) 115% of the most recently
available historic service volume experience for the market area for the
LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program I; or
(ii) 125% of the most recently available
historic service volume experience for the market area for the LoneSTAR Select
Contracting Program II; and
(C) combination of specialized services
available within the market area that is at least as broad as the range of
specialized services presently available to Medicaid recipients in that market
area.
(7) Selective
contracting--A method of contracting, granted through waivers of certain
provisions of the Social Security Act, that allows the department to contract
selectively with health care providers for non-emergency inpatient services,
thereby improving its ability to act as a prudent purchaser of services and to
manage the Medical Assistance Program in a more effective and efficient manner,
as required by Senate Bill 79.
(8)
Selective provider agreement--An agreement which includes an amendment to a
health care provider's existing provider agreement with the department and
involves selective contracting.
(9)
Disproportionate share hospital--A health care provider participating in the
Medicaid program that, according to state Medicaid criteria, meets the
conditions of participation and serves a disproportionate share of indigent
patients. Additional requirements for disproportionate share hospitals are
specified in § 29.609 of this title (relating to Additional Reimbursement
to Disproportionate Share Hospitals) and § 29.610 of this title (relating
to Disproportionate Share Hospital Reimbursement Methodology for State-Owned
Teaching Hospitals).
(10) Health
care provider--
(A) any acute care hospital
that is eligible to provide inpatient hospital services to Medicaid recipients;
or
(B) any inpatient mental health
facility, as defined within this section.
(11) Optional volume management
activities--Those activities that acute care hospitals may propose to furnish
to Medicaid recipients in a market area to expand access to primary care
services and ensure more appropriate use of acute care hospital facilities.
Such activities may include, but not be limited to, furnishing ambulatory
primary care clinic services to Medicaid recipients, and furnishing nurse
hotlines which Medicaid recipients may call to receive professional advice
about the most appropriate means to obtain medical care.
(12) Hardship exemption procedure--A method
for non-contracted health care providers to obtain prior authorization from the
department to provide non-emergency inpatient services to Medicaid recipients
who would experience an unreasonable travel burden under the LoneSTAR Select
Contracting Program(s).
(13)
Emergency inpatient services--An admission into a health care provider with a
diagnosis meeting the definition of a medical emergency.
(14) Non-emergency inpatient services--An
admission into a health care provider with a diagnosis not meeting the
definition of a medical emergency.
(15) LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program
I--The selective contracting program designed and implemented for acute care
hospitals.
(16) LoneSTAR Select
Contracting Program II--The selective contracting program designed and
implemented for inpatient mental health facilities as defined in the Health and
Safety Code, §
RSA
571.003.
(17) Inpatient mental health facility--A
mental health facility that can provide 24-hour residential and acute inpatient
psychiatric services that is:
(A) a facility
operated by the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental
Retardation;
(B) a private mental
hospital licensed by the department;
(C) a community center;
(D) a facility operated by a community center
or other entity the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation
designates to provide mental health services;
(E) an identifiable part of a general
hospital in which diagnosis, treatment, and care for persons with mental
illness is provided and that is licensed by the department; or
(F) a hospital operated by a federal
agency.
(c)
General design. The department shall select that subset of market areas that
appears to indicate the most effective competition for selective provider
agreements to serve Medicaid patients. The market areas shall be divided into
one or more groups of solicitations that will avoid an overlap of contract
evaluation and negotiation of solicitations.
(1) The department shall implement selective
contracting by executing amendments to each health care provider's existing
provider agreement with the department. Health care providers that were not
parties to provider agreements before implementation of the department's
selective contracting are eligible to apply; however, they must enter into a
provider agreement that ensures they are subject to all terms and conditions of
the Medical Assistance Program. The amendments to the provider agreements, and
the process by which the department solicited, evaluated, negotiated, and
executed the amended agreements with health care providers under selective
contracting are not subject to the laws and regulations governing acquisition
of goods and services by state agencies.
(2) Health care providers shall be required
to apply for selective provider agreements on an individual basis. Proposals by
combinations of health care providers under common ownership in a market area
shall be considered as individual proposals if the health care providers elect
to apply on that basis. Proposals by combinations of health care providers in a
market area that are not under common ownership will also be considered,
provided that each health care provider that is a party to a joint application
in a market area also submits an independent application for a selective
contracting agreement in that market area; and each such health care provider
provides written assurances that the terms of its individual proposal were
arrived at independently without consultation with any other health care
provider or combination of health care providers, and have not been
communicated to any competitor or group of competitors. The department does not
intend any action by the State of Texas in the contracting process to require
or sanction any form of communication or joint action by competitors in the
market for inpatient hospital services (with respect to either individual or
joint applications) that fails to comply with the provisions of this
section.
(3) The department shall
send solicitation packages, inviting proposals for selective provider
agreements, to each health care provider serving residents of the counties
selected for participation. Health care providers will be required at all times
to be eligible to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Health
care providers that are not sent solicitation packages for Medicaid recipients
of a particular market will be able to request a package after demonstrating
their intent to offer services to Medicaid recipients in those
markets.
(d) Proposals
for selective provider agreements. Health care providers seeking selective
provider agreements shall be required to submit the following information in
their proposals:
(1) a schedule of proposed
payment rates to be applied to all covered health care provider inpatient
services during the term of the agreement;
(2) a proposed level of volume of services to
Medicaid recipients that the health care provider would agree to serve during
the contract period (this proposed level shall serve only as an estimate of
services to assist the department in evaluating the availability of services
within the relevant market area; it shall not serve as a limit on the amount of
reimbursable services to be supplied by a contracting hospital);
(3) data to assist the department in
evaluating the effective service area and specialized service offerings of the
health care provider;
(4)
assurances and certifications required to ensure health care provider
compliance with the requirements of federal and Texas law and regulations, and
the requirements of the department's selective contracting process;
(5) a narrative description of the proposed
plans (if any) of the acute care hospital to furnish optional volume management
programs for Medicaid recipients; and
(6) evidence that the application of the
health care provider constitutes a binding quotation authorized by the
corporate governance of the health care provider.
(e) Evaluation of proposals for selective
provider agreements for comprehensive market area selective contracting. The
department shall evaluate health care provider proposals, except proposals from
new facilities according to the following criteria.
(1) Health care provider proposals shall be
due to the department within one month of the release of proposal packages. All
health care provider materials submitted to the department during the proposal
process, and materials developed by the department or its contractors during
the course of evaluation and negotiation, shall be confidential until all
agreements are executed for all market areas in the state.
(2) The department shall evaluate health care
provider proposals on a market-by-market basis and determine a negotiation
strategy to pursue in each market area following its evaluation of all market
areas. Based on the application of pre-specified evaluation criteria for each
market area, the department shall prepare a recommended strategy for
contracting in each market area. Each market area strategy shall be subject to
approval by the Executive Oversight Committee established by the
department.
(3) The department
shall retain the option to make awards without negotiation. In some
circumstances, the department may accept the proposals offered by every health
care provider in the market area. In most cases, however, the department
expects to enter into negotiations with those health care providers whose
proposals, taken together, appear to represent the best combination of
providers consistent with the overall objectives of the Medical Assistance
Program. After negotiation, the department reserves the right not to award an
agreement in a specific market area. In most cases, however, the department
shall proceed to finalize and execute agreements with some subset of the health
care providers in each market area. In that event, coverage restrictions
associated with the use of non-contracted health care providers Medicaid
recipients shall apply.
(f) Evaluation criteria and methodology for
comprehensive market area selective contracting. The department's evaluation of
proposals, except proposals from new facilities, for selective provider
agreements for comprehensive coverage of each market area shall be conducted in
two phases. Phase One shall include determining minimally acceptable network
combinations and Phase Two shall include cost evaluation. A description of each
phase follows.
(1) In Phase One, the
department shall enter the information included in health care provider
proposals in each market area into a personal computer based (PC-based)
micro-simulation model designed to aid in the evaluation of the department's
contracting options for each market. Data from health care provider proposals
shall be combined with data from the department's eligibility systems and
claims processing records to construct the data base required for this phase of
the evaluation. Each health care provider's record in the data base shall
contain information necessary to determine each health care provider's:
(A) effective service area for Medicaid
recipients in that market area; and
(B) capacity to provide specialized services
required by Medicaid recipients in the market area.
(2) The PC-based micro-simulation model shall
be used to test all possible combinations of health care providers applying for
selective provider agreements to determine potential networks that shall meet
the department's requirements for access to services for Medicaid patients.
Where health care providers have submitted a joint proposal for selective
provider agreements, the department shall evaluate the proposed provider
network and the proposed network in all possible combinations with remaining
health care providers that submitted proposals.
(3) In Phase Two, each potential network
shall be eligible for further consideration. If the Phase One evaluation fails
to identify a potential network of applicant health care providers that meet
the department's specified criteria, the department reserves the right to enter
into direct negotiations with any health care provider serving the market area.
The purpose of these negotiations shall be to develop a minimally acceptable
potential network, and allow the department to initiate negotiations with a
health care provider that failed to submit a proposal during the proposal
period.
(4) In Phase Two, each
potential network identified in a market area in Phase One shall be evaluated
to determine the estimated reduction in program costs that would result from
entering into selective provider agreements with all of the health care
providers in that potential network, while excluding all other health care
providers from serving non-emergency cases. The department shall use the
PC-based micro-simulation model to produce an estimate of the total change in
Medicaid program costs that would result by entering into agreements with those
health care providers during the base contract period. The estimate by the
department shall consider:
(A) changes in
unit prices to be paid to providers for inpatient services;
(B) changes in the distribution of service
volumes (and case mix) across health care providers that would result from the
reallocation of service volume from non-selected to selected providers;
and
(C) savings in Medicaid program
costs likely to result from the changes in service volumes induced by optional
volume management activities proposed by acute care hospitals, including both
savings in aggregate acute care hospital service use and offsetting increases
in non-hospital service costs.
(5) The result of the evaluation by the
department will be a range of values for each potential network. The ranges
shall be constructed using best case, worst case, and expected value
assumptions about the distribution of service volumes across hospitals in the
network.
(6) Following the
evaluation, the department shall prepare a recommendation to the Executive
Oversight Committee that includes the outcome of both phases of the evaluation
for each market area, as well as a proposed strategy for the department to meet
the best interests of the Medical Assistance Program. Department options shall
include:
(A) making an award without
negotiations--including an award at the proposed price schedules to all health
care providers in the market;
(B)
entering into negotiations with health care providers a single potential
network to improve proposed pricing, if possible, and to finalize an agreement
about key program features; or
(C)
entering into negotiations with one or more health care providers influence the
department's choice among multiple potential networks by lowering the pricing
terms offered by individual health care providers. These negotiations may
result in identifying a single potential network that would differ in its
health care provider composition from potential networks initially identified
in Phase One.
(g) Evaluation criteria for new facilities.
(1) A new facility may petition the
department for selective provider status in a specified market area or market
areas. A new facility must complete the regular enrollment process with the
department or its designee to participate in the Medical Assistance Program,
including the execution of the standard provider agreement before the selective
provider agreement can be implemented. In addition to the information required
of health care providers under subsection (d) of this section, the new
facility's petition shall describe the new facility and shall specify
specialties, other services to be provided, and the size and location of the
new facility. Upon receipt of an acceptable petition to evaluate, the
department will negotiate selective provider reimbursement rate(s) with the new
facility for covered inpatient services provided during the state fiscal year
the petition is evaluated and, if the department desires, for one or two
subsequent state fiscal years. The department shall grant the new facility
selective provider status if the new facility agrees to meet the terms and
conditions negotiated in this paragraph and the terms and conditions of the
LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program(s) under this section. Under no
circumstances shall the department negotiate a rate with the new facility that
is higher than the lesser of either the reimbursement rate used to reimburse
newly constructed hospitals described in § 29.606 of this title (relating
to Reimbursement Methodology for Inpatient Hospital Services) or the weighted
arithmetic mean of the discounted rates for the existing state fiscal year in
the market which the "new" hospital is located or for any subsequent fiscal
year negotiated in this paragraph. Upon execution of a selective provider
agreement between the department and the facility, the new facility shall cease
to meet the definition of a new facility under this section and shall be
subject to all regulations affecting contracted health care providers under
this section.
(2) No petition by a
new facility for selective provider status and department consideration of or
final action on such a petition shall require comprehensive reopening of
selective provider contracting in the affected market area or of the
specialities/services to be provided by the new facility.
(3) The department shall grant or reject a
petition from a new facility under subsection (g) of this section no later than
60 days after receipt by the department of a petition complying with paragraph
(1) of this subsection.
(4) New
facilities granted selective provider status will be required at all times to
be eligible to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs and to comply
with all other applicable provisions under this section.
(h) Execution of selective provider
agreements. The department shall execute selective provider agreements at the
conclusion of negotiations by:
(1) requesting
applicants to submit a binding revised application including the terms and
conditions agreed to during negotiations with the department. The best and
final offer of each health care provider shall be forwarded to the department
for approval. The provider agreements shall be executed following the approval
of the department; and
(2)
structuring the agreements as one year amendments to the provider agreement of
each health care provider, with an option to the department of extending the
amendments for up to two option years. The effective date of the reimbursement
rates under the amendments may, by mutual agreement, be made retroactive to a
date before the date of execution. At the conclusion of the first year, the
department may adjust its exercise of options on a market-by-market basis so as
to place the system on a three-year rolling system of renegotiations. If the
performance of any health care provider under the contract is considered
unsatisfactory, however, the department may elect not to exercise any
subsequent options, even if it exercised options with all other selected health
care providers in the market.
(i) Reimbursement for acute care hospitals.
Acute care hospitals in MSAs where the LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program I
awards amended provided agreements will have their inpatient services
reimbursed as follows.
(1) Hospitals awarded
selective provider agreements will be reimbursed for all inpatient services
(emergency and non-emergency) according to the proposed rates they submitted
with their proposals or according to the final negotiated rates that all
parties agree will serve as the reimbursement mechanism for all inpatient
services rendered by the hospital.
(2) Hospitals not awarded selective provider
agreements will be reimbursed for emergency inpatient services as currently
stated in the State Plan until the patient is stabilized. After a patient is
stabilized in a non-contracted hospital, inpatient services are no longer
covered unless the non-contracted hospital receives an exception for the
remaining number of days of stay required. A non-contracted hospital will not
be reimbursed for non-emergency inpatient services to Medicaid recipients
unless it receives a hardship exemption from the department. Further
explanation of the payment methodology for emergency patients in non-contracted
hospitals and the hardship exemption policy are as follows.
(A) After a patient is stabilized in a
non-contracted hospital, after being admitted with a diagnosis meeting the
definition of a medical emergency, additional inpatient services are no longer
covered, unless the non-contracted hospital receives an exception for the
remaining number of days required. Any and all DRGs with an average length of
stay less than three days (72 hours) will be eligible to be paid the full
reimbursement amount without an exception being granted. Any and all DRGs with
an average length of stay in excess of three days (72 hours) will be eligible
to be paid the full reimbursement amount without an exception being granted if
the patient is stabilized and discharged home within 72 hours from the initial
admission. If an exception is not granted by the department, the hospital will
no longer be eligible to receive reimbursement for services rendered to the
patient.
(i) A non-contracted hospital must
contact the department prior to patient stabilization or as soon as is
practicable after stabilization for determination of further reimbursable
services provided by the non-contracted hospital.
(ii) If a non-contracted hospital does not
contact the department before the patient is discharged, the non-contracted
hospital will be reimbursed on a per diem basis as though the patient were
transferred upon stabilization.
(I) The
non-contracted hospital will not receive full reimbursement for the inpatient
services rendered to the patient.
(II) The initial claim will be denied; the
non-contracted hospital will then be required to submit a complete copy of the
patient's medical record to the department or its designee.
(III) The department or its designee will
determine when the patient was stabilized and establish a per diem
reimbursement amount.
(iii) As in current policy, each case will
continue to be subject to all utilization review criteria.
(B) Non-contracted hospitals will not be
reimbursed for the non-emergency inpatient services provided to Medicaid
recipients as stated in the current State Plan unless the hospital receives
prior authorization from the department through a hardship exemption procedure.
The hardship exemption procedure is developed for Medicaid recipients who might
experience an unreasonable travel burden under the LoneSTAR Select Contracting
Program. The exemption procedure requires the non-contracted hospital or the
admitting physician to contact the department by telephone, facsimile or
written communication and provide an explanation as to the particular
circumstances that the department should be considering in determining the
prior authorization of the non-emergency inpatient service(s) being requested.
The Medicaid patient can not be admitted for reimbursable non-emergency
inpatient services unless a hardship exemption is granted by the department. In
all circumstances, the Medicaid patient must be subject to an unreasonable
travel burden under the Medicaid program for the request to be considered. The
department will provide a decision on all requests for the hardship exemption
procedure as soon as is practicable after receiving the request (usually within
36 hours). The department will contact the requesting non-contracted hospital
or attending physician by telephone with the decision; and subsequently provide
a written communication.
(i) The
non-contracted hospital will be responsible for including the particular
circumstances to be considered by the department in the patient's medical
record; with this information being a permanent part of the medical
record.
(ii) Should a medical
condition develop or be discovered that necessitates a change in the original
admitting diagnosis to a more severe diagnosis, which would require additional
hospital services above and beyond the non-emergency inpatient services
authorized through the initial hardship exemption procedure, any additional
inpatient services rendered will not be covered unless the hospital receives an
authorization for subsequent inpatient services to be rendered.
(I) Should an emergency medical condition
develop or be discovered, the procedures for a non-contracted hospital
providing emergency inpatient services as explained at subparagraph (A) of this
paragraph must be adhered too.
(II)
Any emergency case in a non-contracted hospital with a normal DRG
Length-of-Stay of 72 hours or less; or any normal DRG Length-of-Stay over 72
hours that is stabilized and discharged home within 72 hours from the initial
admission will be granted an automatic exception.
(III) Should a medical condition develop or
be discovered that necessitates a transfer of the patient to a contracted
hospital, the non-contracted hospital will be reimbursed, utilizing the current
transfer methodology.
(iii) As in current policy, each case will
continue to be subject to all relevant utilization review criteria.
(j)
Reimbursement for inpatient mental health facilities. Inpatient mental health
facilities in MSAs where the LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program II awards
amended provider agreements will have their inpatient psychiatric services
reimbursed as follows.
(1) Inpatient mental
health facilities awarded selective provider agreements will be reimbursed for
all covered emergency services according to the proposed rates they submit with
their proposals or according to the final negotiated rates that all parties
agree will serve as the reimbursement mechanism for all covered emergency
services rendered by the health care provider.
(2) Inpatient mental health facilities not
awarded selective provider agreements will be reimbursed for covered emergency
inpatient services as currently stated in the State Plan until the patient is
stabilized. After a patient is stabilized in a non-contracted health care
provider, inpatient services are no longer covered unless the non-contracted
health care provider receives an exception for some additional days of
stay.
(3) As in current policy,
each case will continue to be subject to all relevant utilization review
criteria.