Current through Reg. 49, No. 38; September 20, 2024
(a) General
principles. The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) applies the
general principles of cost determination as specified in §
RSA 355.101 of this
title (relating to Introduction).
(b) Additional requirements. In addition to
the requirements of §
RSA
355.102 and §
RSA
355.103 of this title (relating to General
Principles of Allowable and Unallowable Costs, and Specifications for Allowable
and Unallowable Costs), the following apply to costs for the intermediate care
facilities for persons with mental retardation (ICF/MR) program.
(1) Attendant service costs. Attendant
service costs are defined in §
RSA
355.112 of this title (relating to Attendant
Compensation Rate Enhancement).
(2)
Provider responsibilities. The provider is responsible for submission of the
cost report to HHSC, and payment of amounts owed in accordance with subsection
(c) of this section for services delivered on or before August 31, 2009, and
payment of amounts owed in accordance with §
RSA
355.112 of this title for services delivered
on or after September 1, 2010, regardless of whether the provider contracts
with another entity for the management or operation of the ICF/MR.
(A) If the provider contracts with another
entity for the management or operation of the ICF/MR, the provider must report
the specific costs of that entity as required in the cost report instructions
and not the amount for which the provider is contracting for the entity's
services.
(B) For staff whose
duties include work other than the provision of attendant services for the
provider, time spent providing attendant services and associated expenses may
be reported as attendant service costs if properly documented in accordance
with §
RSA
355.105 of this title (relating to General
Reporting and Documentation Requirements, Methods, and Procedures).
(C) Allowable compensation for owners and
related parties and definitions of owners and related parties are specified in
§
RSA
355.102(i) and §
RSA
355.103(b)(2) of this title.
(i) Time sheet requirement. Owners and
related parties who provide multiple types of attendant service (e.g., direct
care workers, direct care trainers, and job coaches) or both attendant services
and non-attendant services must maintain daily time sheets that record the time
spent on activities in each area. The provider must maintain documentation
relating to the compensation, bonuses, and benefits of each owner or related
party in accordance with §
RSA
355.105(b)(2)(B)(xi) of this
title.
(ii) Calculation of
allowable hourly wage rate and benefits. Allowable hourly wage rate and
benefits for attendant service work must be the lesser of the actual hourly
wage rate paid and benefits paid or the hourly wage rate and benefits for a
comparable attendant assumed in the fully-funded model. The fully-funded model
is the model as calculated under §
RSA
355.456(d) of this title
(relating to Reimbursement Methodology) prior to any adjustments made in
accordance with §
RSA 355.101 of this
title (relating to Introduction) and §
RSA
355.109 of this title (relating to Adjusting
Reimbursement When New Legislation, Regulations or Economic Factors Affect
Costs) for the rate period.
(iii)
Calculation of allowable hours for attendants. Allowable hours per unit of
service for an attendant when the reported hours include related-party hours,
are determined as follows:
(I) Step 1.
Determine the hours per unit of service for a comparable attendant-service
staff-type assumed in the fully-funded model as defined in clause (ii) of this
subparagraph, adjusted for the provider's average Level of Need (LON) during
the reporting period.
(II) Step 2.
Determine the hours per unit of service encompassed by the 90th percentile in
the array of hours per unit of service for comparable attendant-service
staff-types as reported by those contracted providers not reporting any
related-party hours for that staff-type, adjusted for the provider's average
LON during the reporting period.
(III) Step 3. Determine the greater of Step 1
and Step 2.
(IV) Step 4. Determine
the actual hours worked by the staff-type per unit of service.
(V) Step 5. Determine the lesser of Step 4
and Step 3. This value is the allowable hours per unit of service for the
attendant-service staff-type.
(iv) Exception to related party adjustment.
If at least 40 percent of total labor hours in a specific related party's
attendant-service staff-type were provided by non-related-parties, the
related-party's hourly wage rate may be the higher of the model assumption for
that attendant-service staff-type described in clause (ii) of this subparagraph
or the non-related party average for that attendant-service staff-type, so long
as the non-related party average does not exceed the related-party's actual
hourly wage.
(v) Maximum
attendant-care hours. During any single fiscal year, the sum of all
attendant-care hours reported on any cost report(s) for any individual owner or
related party cannot exceed 2,600.
(vi) Classification of hours over the limit.
Hours, hourly wages and benefits above the limits described in clauses (ii) -
(v) of this subparagraph are to be reported as administrative hours, hourly
wages and benefits.
(3) Placement of vendor hold for change of
ownership and contract termination. For services delivered on or before August
31, 2009, the Department of Aging and Disability Services (DADS) will place a
vendor hold on a prior owner at a change of ownership which results in the
execution of a new provider agreement or a contract termination. The prior
owner must submit a cost report to HHSC for the current reporting period. Upon
receipt of an acceptable cost report and resolution of any outstanding
balances, the vendor hold will be released. For services delivered on or after
September 1, 2010, placement of vendor hold for change of ownership and
contract termination will be governed by the information in §
RSA
355.112 of this title.
(4) Ownership change or contract termination
and failure to submit a cost report. For services delivered on or before August
31, 2009, providers with an ownership change from one legal entity to a
different legal entity or a contract termination that do not submit a cost
report for the fiscal year of the ownership change or contract termination
within 60 days of the change of ownership or contract termination are subject
to recoupment of funds related to fiscal accountability as described in
subsection (c)(1)(D) of this section. The recouped funds will not be restored
until the provider submits an acceptable cost report and has paid the actual
amount due as specified in subsection (c)(1)(A) - (C) of this section. If an
acceptable cost report is not received within 365 days of the change of
ownership or contract termination date, the recoupment will become permanent.
For services delivered on or after September 1, 2010, recoupment of funds
related to failure to submit a cost report after an ownership change from one
legal entity to a different legal entity or a contract termination will be
governed by the information in §
RSA
355.112 of this title.
(5) Failure to submit a cost report. For
services delivered on or before August 31, 2009, providers that do not submit a
cost report completed in accordance with all applicable rules and instructions
within 60 days of the placement of a vendor hold due to the failure to submit
the cost report are subject to an immediate recoupment of funds related to
fiscal accountability as described in subsection (c)(1)(D) of this section. The
recouped funds will not be restored until the provider submits an acceptable
cost report and has paid the actual amount due as specified in subsection
(c)(1)(A) - (C) of this section. If an acceptable cost report is not received
within 365 days of the due date, the recoupment will become permanent. For
services delivered on or after September 1, 2010, recoupment of funds related
to failure to submit a cost report within 60 days of the placement of a vendor
hold due to failure to submit the cost report will be governed by the
information in §
RSA
355.112 of this title.
(6) Other applicable rules. For cost reports
pertaining to providers' fiscal years ending in calendar year 2004 and
subsequent years the following applies:
(A)
Providers must follow the cost-reporting guidelines as specified in §
RSA
355.105 of this title.
(B) Providers must follow the guidelines in
determining whether a cost is allowable or unallowable as specified in §
RSA
355.102 and §
RSA
355.103 of this title.
(C) Revenues must be reported on the cost
report in accordance with §
RSA 355.104 of this
title (relating to Revenues).
(7) Field audit and desk review. Desk reviews
or field audits are performed on cost reports for all contracted providers. The
frequency and nature of the field audits are determined by HHSC to ensure the
fiscal integrity of the program. Desk reviews and field audits will be
conducted in accordance with §
RSA
355.106 of this title (relating to Basic
Objectives and Criteria for Audit and Desk Review of Cost Reports), and
providers will be notified of the results of a desk review or a field audit in
accordance with §
RSA
355.107 of this title (relating to
Notification of Exclusions and Adjustments).
(8) Reviews of exclusions or adjustments. An
ICF/MR provider who disagrees with HHSC's exclusion or adjustment of items in
cost reports may request an informal review and, when appropriate, an
administrative hearing as specified in §
RSA
355.110 of this title (relating to Informal
Reviews and Formal Appeals).
(c) Fiscal accountability. For services
delivered on or before August 31, 2009, HHSC will require providers to report
all direct costs incurred in their annual fiscal year. HHSC will compare the
reported direct service costs to the direct service cost component of the
modeled rates.
(1) Fiscal accountability
calculation. The total direct service revenue of the modeled rates is the
direct service portion of the rate multiplied by the number of allowable units
paid for services provided during the reporting period.
(A) Providers whose direct service costs are
90% or more of the direct service revenues will not be subject to repayment
under this section.
(B) Providers
whose direct service costs are less than 85% of the direct service revenues
will be required to pay to HHSC the difference between the direct service costs
and 95% of the direct service revenues.
(C) Providers whose direct service costs are
less than 90% but greater than or equal to 85% of the direct service revenues
will be required to pay to HHSC 75% of the difference between the direct
service costs and 90% of the direct service revenues.
(D) Providers who do not submit an acceptable
cost report as described in subsection (b)(4) or (5) of this section will be
assumed to have direct service costs equal to 65% of the direct services
revenues and HHSC will recoup the difference between 65% of the direct services
revenues and 95% of the direct service revenues, subject to the provisions of
subsection (b)(4) or (5) of this section.
(2) Notification of recoupment. Providers
will be notified, by certified mail, within 90 days of the determination of
their recoupment amount by HHSC of the amount to be repaid to HHSC. If a
subsequent review by HHSC or audit results in adjustments to the Cost Report as
described in subsection (b)(7) of this section that changes the amount to be
repaid to HHSC, the provider will be notified in writing of the adjustments and
the adjusted amount to be repaid. HHSC will recoup any amount owed from a
provider's vendor payment(s) following the date of the notification
letter.
(3) Repayment. Repayment
will be collected from the following:
(A) the
provider or legal entity submitting the report;
(B) any other legal entity responsible for
the debts or liabilities of the submitting entity; or
(C) the legal entity on behalf of which a
report is submitted.
(4)
Repayment when ownership change or contract termination occurs. For providers
undergoing an ownership change or contract termination, HHSC will recoup any
amount owed from the provider's vendor payments that are being held. In cases
where funds identified for recoupment cannot be repaid from the held vendor
payments, the responsible entity from paragraph (3) of this subsection will be
jointly and severally liable for any additional payment due to HHSC. Failure to
repay the amount due or submit an acceptable payment plan within 60 days of
notification will result in the recoupment of the owed funds from other
Medicaid contracts controlled by the responsible entity, placement of a vendor
hold on all Medicaid contracts controlled by the responsible entity and will
bar the responsible entity from receiving any new contracts with HHSC until
repayment is made in full. The responsible entity for these contracts will be
notified as described in paragraph (2) of this subsection prior to the
recoupment of owed funds, placement of vendor hold and barring of new
contracts.
(5) Aggregation.
(A) Definitions. The following words and
terms have the following meanings when used in this paragraph.
(i) Aggregation--For an entity defined in
clause (iii) of this subparagraph that controls, as defined in clause (iv) of
this subparagraph, more than one ICF/MR component code, the process of
determining compliance with the spending requirements detailed in paragraph (1)
of this subsection for all component codes controlled by the entity in the
aggregate rather than requiring each component code to meet its spending
requirement individually. For commonly owned corporations defined in clause
(ii) of this subparagraph, the process of determining compliance with the
spending requirements detailed in paragraph (1) of this subsection for all
component codes in the controlled small group in the aggregate rather than
requiring each component code to meet its spending requirement individually.
Corporations that do not meet the definitions under clauses (ii) - (iii) of
this subparagraph are not eligible for aggregation.
(ii) Commonly owned corporations--two or more
corporations where five or fewer identical persons who are individuals,
estates, or trusts own greater than 50 percent of the total voting power in
each corporation.
(iii) Entity--a
parent company, sole member, individual, limited partnership, or group of
limited partnerships controlled by the same general partner.
(iv) Control--greater than 50% ownership by
the entity.
(B)
Component Codes Included in Aggregation. If an entity controlling more than one
ICF/MR component code or commonly owned corporations requests aggregation,
compliance with the spending requirements will be evaluated in the aggregate
for all ICF/MR component codes that the entity or commonly owned corporations
controlled at the end of its fiscal year or at the effective date of the change
of ownership or termination of its last ICF/MR contract.
(C) Aggregation Request. To exercise the
aggregation option, the entity or commonly owned corporations must submit an
aggregation request, in a manner prescribed by HHSC, at the time each cost
report is submitted. In limited partnerships in which the same single general
partner controls all the limited partnerships, that single general partner must
make this request. Other such aggregation requests will be reviewed on a
case-by-case basis.
(D) Frequency
of Aggregation Requests. The entity or commonly owned corporations must submit
a separate request for aggregation for each reporting period.
(E) Ownership Changes and Contract
Terminations. ICF/MR contracts that change ownership or terminate effective
after the end of the applicable reporting period, but prior to the
determination of compliance with spending requirements as per paragraph (1) of
this subsection, are excluded from all aggregate spending calculations. These
contracts' compliance with spending requirements will be determined on an
individual basis and the costs and revenues will not be included in the
aggregate spending calculation.