Rules & Regulations of the State of Tennessee
Title 1100 - Board of Paroles
Chapter 1100-01-01 - Conduct of Parole Proceedings
Section 1100-01-01-.14 - REVOCATION OF PAROLE
Universal Citation: TN Comp Rules and Regs 1100-01-01-.14
Current through September 24, 2024
(1) Parole Revocation.
(a) If a Probation/Parole Officer
having charge of an offender, has reasonable cause to believe that the offender
has violated one or more of the conditions of parole in an important respect,
such officer shall present such evidence to the Director or designee.
(b) This report shall be in written form, and
shall contain a listing of the violations alleged and the facts and
circumstances surrounding each violation.
(c) Upon receipt of a Probation/Parole
Officer's report alleging violation of parole, the Director or designee, may
issue a warrant for the retaking of the offender and his or her return to a
correctional institution in the State of Tennessee, if the Director or designee
determines parole has been violated in an important respect.
(d) Any officer authorized to serve criminal
process, or any peace officer to whom such warrant is delivered, shall execute
the warrant by taking the offender into custody.
(e) In those cases where the offender is
confined in another state pending new criminal charges, or is serving a
sentence in another state, the warrant may be placed there as a detainer. If it
becomes apparent that the Board cannot obtain physical custody of the offender
detained in another state, the Director or designee shall withdraw the warrant
and issue a letter of notification. The letter of notification shall consist of
a letter sent to the custodian of the offender being held in another
jurisdiction and shall inform such custodian that the named individual is an
alleged parole violator in the State of Tennessee.
(f) Such notification shall request that the
out-of-state custodian inform the Tennessee Director or designee of the release
of the named offender at least ninety (90) days prior to such release from the
out-of-state or foreign jurisdiction.
(g) Upon receipt of notification by the
custodian that an offender will be released, the Director or designee shall
reissue the warrant so that the offender may be returned to Tennessee by
execution of such warrant unless parole has expired.
(h) When an offender is returned to the
custody of Tennessee authorities from his or her confinement by an out-of-state
custodian, such offender shall be afforded prompt parole revocation
proceedings.
(i) Nothing in this
rule shall be construed to prevent the Director or designee from issuing a
letter of notification to the custodian of the offender in the first instance
in lieu of placing a warrant as a detainer.
(2) Preliminary Hearing.
(a) Upon execution of a warrant by the
Director, the offender shall be given adequate notice of the preliminary
hearing or revocation hearing. If a revocation hearing is held within fourteen
(14) days after the service of the warrant, a preliminary hearing is not
required.
(b) The notice shall
state the time and place of the hearing and shall inform the offender that at
the hearing he or she will be given the opportunity to present witnesses and
documentary evidence in his or her behalf, shall be allowed to cross-examine
any adverse witnesses in attendance, and that he or she has a limited right to
request legal representation.
(c)
Unless waived in writing or a revocation hearing is held within fourteen (14)
days of service of the warrant, the offender shall be afforded a preliminary
hearing.
(d) The preliminary
hearing shall be conducted as scheduled unless the offender voluntarily waives
such hearing in writing. For such a waiver to be effective, it must contain the
following:
1. A clear statement that the
offender is entitled to a preliminary parole revocation hearing; and
2. A clear statement that the offender has
the right to present documentary evidence, as well as individual testimony
which may give relevant information to the Hearing Officer, and a limited right
to request legal representation.
(e) If the offender expresses his or her
desire to waive such hearing, a Probation/Parole Officer shall explain the
contents of the waiver to the offender and shall not accept such waiver unless
he or she is reasonably certain that the offender fully understands the
contents and consequences of such a waiver and that the offender knowingly and
voluntarily still desires to waive his or her preliminary hearing.
(f) A request to appoint an attorney for an
offender may be forwarded to the General Counsel of the Board of Parole under
two circumstances:
1. If a preliminary hearing
is held and the Hearing Officer is of the belief that the inmate is incapable
of speaking effectively for himself or herself, the Hearing Officer shall
continue the hearing and notify the General Counsel for the Board that an
attorney appointment is recommended. Upon receiving this recommendation, an
attorney may or may not be appointed.
2. The offender may request that he or she be
appointed counsel to represent him or her. If the offender has made such a
request, the Hearing Officer shall determine whether the request shall be
forwarded to the General Counsel under the criteria the General Counsel
considers in (g)1.-3.
(g) The General Counsel may appoint attorneys
in accordance with applicable case law or in the following situations:
1. The offender has made a timely and
colorable claim that he has not committed the alleged violation of the
conditions upon which he is at liberty; or
2. Even if the violation is a matter of
public record or is uncontested, there are substantial reasons which justified
or mitigated the violation and make revocation inappropriate and that the
reasons are complex or otherwise difficult to develop or present; or
3. The offender is incapable of speaking
effectively for himself or herself.
(h) In every case in which a request for
counsel at a preliminary hearing is denied, the grounds for such refusal shall
be stated succinctly, in writing, by the Hearing Officer.
(i) In every case in which a request for
counsel at a preliminary hearing is not made, the Hearing Officer or a Parole
Officer shall have the offender sign a statement that he or she has been fully
informed of his or her ability to request that he or she be appointed counsel
to represent him or her and that he or she has decided not to seek appointed
representation.
(j) Nothing in this
rule shall be construed to prevent the waiver of the right to a preliminary
hearing and the decision not to request counsel at the preliminary hearing from
appearing on the same document.
(k)
At the preliminary hearing, the offender shall have the right to:
1. Appear at the hearing and speak in his or
her own behalf;
2. Produce
documents, letters, and individuals relevant to the violation(s)
alleged;
3. Confront and
cross-examine persons who have given adverse information upon which his or her
parole revocation is to be based, unless the Hearing Officer finds good cause
exists to disallow such cross-examination and confrontation; and
4. Be represented by retained counsel or an
attorney appointed under the conditions noted above.
(l) The Hearing Officer shall conduct the
hearing informally, including the presentation of the documents or evidence in
support of parole violation and the offender's responses to such evidence.
Based on the information presented at the hearing, such Officer shall determine
whether probable cause exists to believe that the offender violated the
conditions of his or her parole in an important respect.
(m) If the Hearing Officer determines it is
necessary or the offender requests that any witnesses be subpoenaed, such
Officer shall employ the following procedure:
1. If the witnesses are requested by the
offender, such offender or his or her attorney shall submit a written statement
to the Probation and Parole Officer, as well in advance of the scheduled
hearing as possible, of the names of the persons requested as well as a brief
statement of why their testimony is relevant. The statement requesting
witnesses shall be forwarded to the Board of Parole which shall review the
request(s) and issue subpoenas for necessary witnesses.
2. If the witnesses are requested by the
state, the person representing the state shall comply with the same procedure
set out in subpart (1) above, but the request shall be sent directly to the
Board of Parole.
3. Failure to
comply with this procedure by the parties shall be sufficient grounds for
denial of a subpoena request. If the offender is not represented by an attorney
the subpoenas may be served by a Probation/Parole Officer or sent by certified
mail.
(n) At the
preliminary hearing, the Hearing Officer shall select one of the following
alternative decisions:
1. No probable cause
found, and the offender shall be returned to supervision and the violation
warrant withdrawn; or
2. Probable
cause found and the offender shall remain in custody under the violation
warrant to await a final parole revocation hearing before the Board.
(3) Declaration of Delinquency.
(a) A declaration of delinquency
may be issued by the Director of Probation and Parole in revocation proceedings
to suspend such credit toward the service of the offender's sentence. Such
declaration shall be made by the Director or designee in any case when a parole
violation warrant is issued, and the parolee is not in custody.
(b) Except when an offender is declared to be
in a delinquent status, the time he or she is on parole is credited toward the
service of his or her sentence unless it is taken by the Board after a
revocation of parole.
(c) If
delinquency is declared, the offender stops earning credit for the service of
his or her sentence from the date of declaration, until the parole violation
warrant is served and the offender is housed in a correctional facility in
Tennessee. Offenders taken into custody in another state will remain in
delinquent status from the declaration of delinquency until they are returned
to a Tennessee correctional facility or until delinquency is removed by the
Board.
(d) During the revocation
process, the Board may consider an alleged violation and determine either that
parole should not be revoked or that mitigating or compelling circumstances
exist for the violation. The Board may then "take" or "grant" the delinquent
time. Taking delinquent time requires that the offender lose credit toward
service of sentence. The Board may take all of the delinquent time or some
lesser amount of time, which is set by the Board. Granting the delinquent time
restores all of the offender's credit toward service of sentence as though
delinquency had never been declared.
(4) Notice of Final Parole Revocation Hearing.
(a) Prior to the revocation hearing,
the offender shall be notified in writing of the following:
1. The date, time, and location of the
hearing;
2. That the offender has
the right to appear in person and present such evidence as he or she
desires;
3. That he or she has the
right to confront and cross-examine any adverse witnesses, unless good cause
can be shown for refusing confrontation and cross-examination, such as a
significant potential for harm if identities are revealed; and
4. That the offender has a limited right to
request that counsel be appointed to represent him or her at the final
revocation hearing.
(5) Continuance of Final Revocation Hearing.
(a) Following a finding of probable cause at
the preliminary hearing, the Board shall schedule a final revocation hearing as
promptly as possible to consider the alleged violation(s) of parole.
(b) On its own motion, the Board may continue
the final revocation hearing in order to secure more or necessary evidence or
witnesses at the hearing, or to secure counsel to represent the
offender.
(6) Final Revocation Hearing.
(a) At the final
revocation hearing, the offender shall have the right to appear and be heard in
person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence.
(b) The offender shall have the right to
confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, unless the Board specifically
finds good cause for not allowing such confrontation and
cross-examination.
(c) A request to
appoint an attorney to an offender may be forwarded to the General Counsel of
the Board of Parole under two circumstances:
1. If at a final revocation hearing, the
Hearing Officer is of the belief that the inmate is incapable of speaking
effectively for himself or herself, the Hearing Officer shall continue the
hearing and notify the General Counsel for the Board, that an attorney
appointment is recommended. Upon receiving this recommendation, an attorney may
or may not be appointed.
2. The
offender may request that he or she be appointed counsel to represent him or
her. If the offender has made such a request, the Hearing Officer shall
determine whether the request shall be forwarded to the General Counsel under
the criteria the General Counsel considers in (d)1.-3.
(d) The General Counsel may appoint attorneys
in accordance with applicable case law or in the following situations:
1. The offender has made a timely and
colorable claim that he has not committed the alleged violation of the
conditions upon which he is at liberty; or
2. Even if the violation is a matter of
public record or is uncontested, there are substantial reasons which justified
or mitigated the violation and make revocation inappropriate and that the
reasons are complex or otherwise difficult to develop or present; or
3. The offender is incapable of speaking
effectively for himself or herself.
(e) In every case in which a request for
counsel at a final revocation hearing is refused, the grounds for such refusal
shall be stated succinctly in the record, in writing.
(f) In every case in which a request for
counsel at a final revocation hearing is not made, the Board shall have the
offender sign a statement that he or she has been fully informed of his or her
ability to request that he or she be appointed counsel to represent him or her
and that he or she has decided not to seek appointed representation.
(g) At the final revocation hearing, the
Board will initially determine whether the alleged violation of parole is
supported by a preponderance of the evidence. In all cases, the burden shall be
on the State to establish that a violation occurred.
(h) If the Board determines that a parole
violation occurred, or if the offender admits to a violation, the Board shall
next consider whether such grant of parole should be revoked for the
violation.
(i) In all cases,
including those situations in which the offender has been convicted of a new
offense, the Board shall consider any mitigating factors advanced by the
offender, which suggest that the violation of parole does not warrant
revocation.
(j) All parole
revocation hearings shall be conducted in a manner as informal as is consistent
with due process and the technical rules of evidence shall not apply to such
hearings.
(k) All evidence upon
which the finding of a parole violation may be based, shall be disclosed to the
offender at the revocation hearing unless it has been declared confidential by
the Board.
(l) Nothing in this
subsection shall be construed to prevent the Board from disclosing documentary
evidence by reading or summarizing the appropriate document for the
offender.
(m) If the Board sustains
a violation involving a new felony, class A misdemeanor, absconding, or zero
tolerance violation and decides to revoke parole, the offender shall be
returned to confinement to serve the remaining portion of his or her sentence
or such part as the Board directs. If the Board sustains a violation involving
only a technical violation of the rules of parole, the Board may revoke parole
for fifteen (15) days for a first revocation, thirty (30) days for a second
revocation, ninety (90) days for a third revocation, or the remainder of the
sentence, for a fourth or subsequent revocation. The time an inmate spent on
parole shall not be considered as service of the sentence unless the Board
determines to grant all or part of such "street time" to the inmate.
(n) The Board shall set a review date and
record it on a Board Action Sheet.
(o) If the Board finds that the offender did
not commit the alleged violation or, if he or she did, finds that mitigating
factors dictate revocation is not appropriate, the offender shall be allowed to
resume his or her parole status subject to the conditions approved by the
Board.
(7) Felony Committed While on Parole.
(a) If a person is
convicted in this state of a felony committed while on parole from a prison,
workhouse, or jail in this state, he or she shall serve the remainder of his or
her sentence under which parole was granted, or such part of that sentence as
the Board may determine before he or she commences serving the sentence fixed
for the crime committed while on parole.
(b) If a person on parole from a prison,
workhouse, or jail in this state is convicted of a crime under the law of
another state or county which, if committed in this state, would be a felony,
the Director of Probation and Parole in this state, shall seek to return such
offender to this state through the terms of the interstate compact. If such
offender is returned, the Board shall require that he or she serve the portion
remaining of his or her maximum term of sentence or such part of that term as
the Board may determine.
(c) The
Board, at its discretion, may recommend to the Commissioner of Correction, the
removal of all or any part thereof, of the good and honor time and incentive
time such inmate accrued on the sentence under which he or she was paroled. The
final decision relative to whether any or all of such time credits will be
removed shall be made by the Commissioner of Correction.
Authority: T.C.A. §§ 40-28-104, 40-28-105, 40-28-106, 40-28-118, 40-28-121 through 40-28-123, and 40-35-504.
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Tennessee may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.