(1) Effluent
standards and limitations shall be formulated in accordance with the following
requirements:
(a) For existing sources, other
than publicly owned treatment works, technology-based effluent limitations
shall be designed to require application of the best practicable control
technology currently available or application of the best available technology
economically achievable, as applicable in accordance with requirements of
Section 301 (b)(2)(A), Federal Water Pollution Control Act, PL
92-500.
(b) For new sources,
technology-based effluent limitations shall require the greatest degree of
effluent reduction achievable through application of the best available
demonstrated control technology, which shall be new source performance
standards, if available.
(c)
(Reserved).
(d) Toxic effluent
limitations shall be based on consideration of the toxicity of the pollutant,
its persistence, its degradability, the usual or potential presence of the
affected organisms in any waters, the importance of the affected organisms, and
the nature and extent of the effect of the toxic pollutant on such
organisms.
(e) Pretreatment
standards shall be designed to prevent the introduction into publicly owned
treatment works of those pollutants that may interfere with, pass through, or
otherwise be incompatible with such works.
(f) All effluent limitations or standards
shall be at least as stringent as any minimum standards promulgated by the
Administrator and currently effective under the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act, P.L. 92-500 as amended or any subsequent applicable acts.
(g) All pollutants shall receive treatment or
corrective action to ensure compliance with effluent limitations established by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to Sections 301 and 302 and
standards of performance for new sources pursuant to Section 306, effluent
limitations and prohibitions and pretreatment standards pursuant to Section 307
of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended, PL 92-500; also to
ensure compliance with any approved water quality standard, or avoid conflict
with an approved area-wide waste treatment management plan prepared according
to Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended, PL
92-500.
(h) Any schedules of
compliance under this rule shall require compliance as soon as possible, but
not later than the applicable statutory deadline under the federal law. When
the Division establishes a compliance schedule, it shall consider the technical
and economic feasibility of waste treatment, recovery, or adjustment of the
method of discharge. Any such schedule of compliance shall require compliance
with an enforceable final effluent limitation as soon as possible and include a
final compliance date. If compliance will take longer than one year, the
schedule of compliance shall establish enforceable interim requirements,
establish dates for compliance with these requirements that are no longer than
one year apart, and require reporting of interim compliance actions within 14
days of the applicable deadline. If the time necessary for completion of any
requirement is more than one year and the requirement is not readily divisible
into stages for completion, the permit shall require, at a minimum, specified
dates for annual submission of progress reports on the status of interim
requirements.
(i) Best management
practices to control or abate the discharge of pollutants when numeric effluent
limitations are infeasible and the practices are reasonably necessary to
achieve effluent limitations and standards or to carry out the purposes and
intent of TWQCA.
(j)
1. When a permit is renewed or reissued,
effluent limitations, standards or conditions shall be at least as stringent as
the effluent limitations, standards, or conditions in the previous permit
unless:
(i) The circumstances on which the
previous permit was based have materially and substantially changed since the
time the permit was issued and would constitute cause for permit modification
or revocation and reissuance;
(ii)
Material and substantial alterations or additions to the permitted facility
occurred after permit issuance which justify the application of a less
stringent effluent limitation;
(iii) Information is available which was not
available at the time of permit issuance (other than revised regulations,
guidance, or test methods) and which would have justified the application of a
less stringent effluent limitation at the time of permit issuance;
(iv) Technical mistakes or mistaken
interpretations of law were made in issuing the permit;
(v) A less stringent effluent limitation is
necessary because of events over which the permittee has no control and for
which there is no reasonably available remedy; or
(vi) The permittee has installed the
treatment facilities required to meet the effluent limitations in the previous
permit and has properly operated and maintained the facilities but has
nevertheless been unable to achieve the previous effluent limitations, in which
case the limitations in the reviewed, reissued, or modified permit may reflect
the level of pollutant control actually achieved.
2. In no event may a permit be renewed,
reissued, or modified to contain an effluent limitation which is less stringent
than required by effluent guidelines in effect at the time the permit is
renewed, reissued, or modified.
3.
In no event may a permit be renewed, issued, or modified to contain a less
stringent effluent limitation if the implementation of such limitation would
result in a violation of a water quality standard.
(k) All permit effluent limitations,
standards, and prohibitions shall be established for each outfall or discharge
point of the permitted facility, except as otherwise provided for best
management practices (BMPs) where limitations on effluent or internal waste
streams are infeasible.
(l) In the
case of POTWs or domestic wastewater treatment plants, permit effluent
limitations, standards, or prohibitions shall be calculated based on design
flow.
(m) For continuous
discharges, all permit effluent limitations, standards, and prohibitions shall
be expressed as maximum daily, weekly average (for POTWs only), and monthly
average, unless impracticable.
(n)
Non-continuous discharges shall be limited in terms of frequency, total mass,
maximum rate of discharge, and mass or concentrations of specified pollutants,
as appropriate.
(o) Any permit
limitations, standards, or prohibitions based on production shall be based upon
a reasonable measure of actual production.
1.
For new sources or dischargers, actual production shall be estimated from
projected production.
2. The time
period of the measure of production shall correspond to the time period of the
resulting permit limits. For example, monthly production levels shall be used
to calculate monthly average permit limits.
(p) All permit effluent limitations,
standards, or prohibitions for a metal shall be expressed as "total recoverable
metal" unless a promulgated effluent guideline or an applicable, water quality
criterion specifies otherwise.
(q)
When permit effluent limitations or standards imposed at the point of discharge
are impractical or infeasible, effluent limitations or standards for discharges
of pollutants may be imposed on internal waste streams before mixing with other
waste streams or cooling water streams. In those instances, the monitoring
required shall also be applied to the internal waste streams. Limits on
internal waste streams will be imposed only when the rationale sets forth the
exceptional circumstances which make such limitations necessary, such as when
the final discharge point is inaccessible (for example, under water), the
wastes at the point of discharge are so diluted as to make monitoring
impracticable, or the interferences among pollutants at the point of discharge
would make detection or analysis impracticable.
(r) Instantaneous maximum concentration or
similar limitations may be imposed in permits when:
1. Toxic or harmful parameters are present in
such significant amounts or concentrations as to represent a threat to the
possibility of maintaining receiving waters in accordance with established
classifications; and
2. The
discharge is characterized as irregular, such as high peak, short duration
flow.
(s) Any discharge
or activity authorized by a permit that is not a minor facility discharge or
activity, or the Regional Administrator requests, in writing, be monitored, or
contains a toxic pollutant for which an effluent standard has been established
shall be monitored by the permittee for the following:
1. Flow (in million gallons per day);
and
2. Any of the following
pollutants:
(i) Pollutants (either directly or
indirectly through the use of accepted correlation coefficients or equivalent
measurements determined to be applicable to the discharge to which they are
applied) that are subject to reduction or elimination under the terms and
conditions of the permit;
(ii)
Pollutants that the Commissioner finds, on the basis of information available,
could have a significant impact on the quality of waters;
(iii) Pollutants specified by the
Administrator, in regulations issued pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, as subject to monitoring; and
(iv) Any pollutants, in addition to those
identified in subparts (i) through (iii) of this part, that the Regional
Administrator or the Commissioner request be monitored.
(t) If a toxic effluent standard
or prohibition (including any schedule of compliance specified in such effluent
standard or prohibition) is established for a toxic pollutant that is present
in the permittee's discharge and such standard or prohibition is more stringent
than any limitation upon such pollutant in the permit, the Commissioner shall
revise or modify the permit in accordance with established procedure to include
the toxic effluent standard or prohibition and so notify the
permittee.
(u) The Commissioner may
require flow monitoring in other situations where necessary to comply with the
Act.
(v) If non-potable reuse of
reclaimed wastewater is utilized in association with an NPDES - authorized
discharge, the NPDES permit shall impose conditions in accordance with the
requirements of Rule 0400-40-06-.10, unless the reuse is separately governed by
a state operating permit.
(2) All discharges authorized by the permit
shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of the permit. Facility
expansions, production increases, or process modifications that result in new
or increased discharges of pollutants shall be reported by submission of a new
application or, if such discharge does not violate effluent limitations
specified in the permit, by submission to the Commissioner of notice of such
new or increased discharges of pollutants. The discharge of any pollutant more
frequently than or at a level in excess of that authorized by the permit shall
constitute a violation of the terms and conditions of the permit.