South Carolina Code of Regulations
Chapter 61 - DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
Subchapter 61-98 - STATE UNDERGROUND PETROLEUM ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE BANK (SUPERB) SITE REHABILITATION AND FUND ACCESS REGULATION
Section 61-98.I - Scope and Definitions
Universal Citation: SC Code Regs 61-98.I
Current through Register Vol. 48, No. 9, September 27, 2024
A. Scope. This regulation, promulgated pursuant to the State Underground Petroleum Environmental Response Bank Act (SUPERB), sets forth certain requirements for site rehabilitation for releases from underground storage tanks (USTs) governed under the SUPERB Act and Regulation Regulation 61-92; accessing the SUPERB account; certification of site rehabilitation contractors and suspension and decertification of site rehabilitation contractors by the Department of Health and Environmental Control (the Department).
B. Definitions.
1. Active Remediation. Physical actions taken
to reduce the concentrations of chemicals of concern.
2. Affiliate. Persons are affiliates of each
other if, directly or indirectly, either one controls or has the power to
control the other, or a third person controls or has the power to control both.
Indicia of control include, but are not limited, to: interlocking management or
ownership, identity of interest among family members, shared facilities and
equipment, common use of employees, or a business entity organized following
the suspension or debarment of a person which has the same or similar
management, ownership or principal employees as the suspended, debarred, or
voluntarily excluded person.
3.
Attenuation. The reduction in concentrations of chemicals of concern in the
environment with distance and time due to processes that include, but are not
limited to, diffusion, dispersion, and absorption.
4. Carcinogen. Substances which have been
classified for human carcinogenic risk by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.
5. Certification. An action
taken by the Department in accordance with this regulation to authorize a
contractor to perform site rehabilitation under the SUPERB Act.
6. Chemicals of Concern. Specific
constituents that are identified for evaluation in the risk assessment
process.
7. Civil Judgment. The
disposition of a civil action by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether
entered by verdict, decision, settlement, stipulation, or otherwise.
8. Corrective Action. A subset of site
rehabilitation activities conducted to protect human health, safety, and the
environment. These activities include recovery of free-product, evaluating
risks, evaluating and implementing intrinsic remediation, making no further
action decisions, implementing institutional controls, active remediation,
designing and operating cleanup systems and equipment, and monitoring of
progress.
9. Corrective Action
Plan. A document outlining proposed corrective actions.
10. Direct Exposure Pathway. An exposure
pathway where the point of exposure is at the source without a release to any
other medium (for example, inhalation of vapors or dermal contact with
free-product).
11. Engineering
Controls. Modifications to a site, such as capping or water treatment at the
point of use, to reduce or eliminate the potential for exposure to chemicals of
concern.
12. Engineering Report. A
document outlining the proposed technical equipment specifications of a
corrective action system.
13.
Exposure. Contact of a receptor(s) with chemicals of concern. Exposure is
quantified as the amount of the chemical of concern available at the exchange
boundaries, such as skin or lungs, and available for absorption by the human
body.
14. Exposure Assessment. The
determination or estimation, qualitative or quantitative, of the magnitude,
frequency, duration, and route of exposure.
15. Exposure Factor. An intake variable
value, either established by the Environmental Protection Agency or based on
site-specific data, used to estimate an exposure concentration.
16. Exposure Pathway. The course chemicals of
concern take from the source area(s) to an exposed organism. An exposure
pathway describes a unique mechanism by which a receptor(s) is exposed to
chemicals of concern. A complete exposure pathway includes a source or release
from a source, an exposure point, and an exposure route. If the exposure point
differs from the source, a transport/exposure media (e.g., ground water) is
included.
17. Exposure Point. The
point at which it is assumed that a receptor, either potential or actual, can
come into contact, either now or in the future, with the chemicals of concern.
Maximum contaminant levels or other existing water quality standards must be
met at the exposure point.
18.
Exposure Route. The manner in which chemicals of concern come in contact with
an organism (i.e., ingestion, inhalation, dermal contact).
19. Familial Relationship. A connection or
association by family or relatives, in which a family member or relative has a
material interest. Family or relatives include: father, mother, son, daughter,
brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife,
father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law,
sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother,
stepsister, half brother, half sister, grandparent, great grandparent,
grandchild, great grandchild, step grandparent, step great grandparent, step
grandchild, step great grandchild, or fiancee.
20. Financial Relationship. A connection or
association through a material interest of sources of income which exceed five
percent of annual gross income from a business entity.
21. Hazard Index. The sum of two or more
hazard quotients for multiple regulated substances and/or multiple exposure
pathways which impact the same target organ or act by the same method of
toxicity.
22. Hazard Quotient. The
ratio of a single substance exposure level over a specific time period to a
reference dose for that substance derived from a similar exposure
period.
23. Indirect Exposure
Pathways. An exposure pathway with at least one intermediate release to any
media between the source and the point of exposure (for example, leaching of
chemicals of concern from soils to ground water).
24. Institutional Controls. The restriction
on use of or access to a site to eliminate or minimize potential exposure to
chemicals of concern.
25. Intrinsic
Remediation. The verifiable reduction of concentrations of chemicals of concern
through naturally occurring microbial activity or attenuation
mechanisms.
26. Legal Proceedings.
Any criminal proceedings or any civil judicial proceedings to which the
Federal, State, or Local government or quasi-governmental authority is a party.
The term includes appeals from such proceedings.
27. Maximum Contaminant Level. A standard for
drinking water established by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the
Safe Drinking Water Act which is the maximum permissible level of chemicals of
concern in water which is used as a drinking water supply.
28. Non-Carcinogen. Substances shown either
through epidemiological studies or through laboratory studies to cause adverse
health effects other than cancer.
29. Notice. A written communication served in
person or sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, or its equivalent,
to the last known address of a party, its identified counsel, its agent for
service of process, or any partner, officer, director, owner, or joint venturer
of the party. Notice, if undeliverable, shall be considered in effect five days
after being properly sent to the last address known by the
Department.
30. Person. An
individual, partnership, corporation, or other legal entity organized or united
for a business purpose, or a governmental agency.
31. Point(s) of Compliance. A location(s)
selected between the source area and the exposure point(s) where chemicals of
concern must be at or below the determined target levels in specific media
(e.g., soil, ground water, air).
32. Proposal. A plan, request, invitation to
consider or similar communication outlining cost, labor, or equipment estimates
by or on behalf of a person seeking to directly or indirectly participate or to
receive a benefit, directly or indirectly, from site rehabilitation.
33. Reasonably Anticipated Future Use. Future
land use which can be predicted given current use, local government planning,
and zoning.
34. Reasonable Maximum
Exposure. Combination of upper-bound and mid-range exposure factors to be used
in dose estimation equations to provide a result which represents an exposure
scenario that is both protective and reasonable; not the worst case.
35. Receptors. Persons, structures,
utilities, surface water, sensitive habitats, water supply wells, or other
living organisms that are, or may be, affected by a release.
36. Related Interest. Affiliated companies,
principal owners of the client company, or any other party with which the
client deals where one of the parties can influence the management or operation
policies of the other.
37. Release.
Means any spilling, leaking, emitting, discharging, escaping, leaching or
disposing from an underground storage tank into subsurface soils, ground water,
or surface water.
38. Risk. The
probability that a chemical of concern, when released into the environment,
will cause an adverse effect in exposed humans or other living
organisms.
39. Risk Assessment. An
analysis of the potential for adverse health effects caused by chemicals of
concern to determine the need for corrective action. Also used to develop
target levels where remedial action is required.
40. Risk Reduction. The lowering or
elimination of the level of risk posed to human health or the environment
through initial response action, corrective action, or institutional or
engineering controls.
41.
Risk-Based Screening Levels. Risk based, non site-specific, corrective action
target levels for chemicals of concern.
42. Sensitive Habitat. Fresh and salt water
fisheries, fish habitats including shellfish areas, coastal and inland
wetlands, and habitats of threatened or endangered species.
43. Site. Includes all land, regardless of
ownership considerations or property boundaries, which is directly affected by
the chemicals of concern.
44. Site
Classification. A qualitative evaluation of a site based on known or readily
available information.
45. Site
Conceptual Exposure Model. An analysis of the current and reasonably potential
future pathways based on reasonably anticipated receptors and current and
reasonably anticipated future use to identify complete exposure pathways. The
analysis should be documented in a flow chart or diagram, or other appropriate
format, to depict the complete exposure pathways. The site conceptual exposure
model should be updated as additional information is obtained for the
site.
46. Site Rehabilitation.
Cleanup actions taken in response to a release from a UST which includes, but
is not limited to, assessment, investigation, evaluation, planning, design,
engineering, construction, or other services put forth to investigate or
cleanup affected subsurface soils, ground water or surface water.
47. Site Rehabilitation Contractor. An
individual or corporation, other than the owner/operator, who performs site
rehabilitation under the SUPERB Act and this regulation.
48. Site-Specific Target Level. Risk-based
corrective action target levels for chemicals of concern developed for a
particular site under the Tier 2 and Tier 3 evaluations.
49. Source Area. Either the location of
free-phase hydrocarbons or the location of highest soil and ground-water
concentration of the chemicals of concern.
50. Tier 1 Evaluation. A risk-based analysis
where non-site-specific values based on conservative exposure factors (i.e.,
risk-based screening levels), potential exposure pathways, and land use are
evaluated to determine appropriate actions.
51. Tier 2 Evaluation. A risk-based analysis
applying the risk-based screening levels at the exposure point, development of
site-specific target levels for potential indirect exposure pathways based on
site-specific conditions, and establishment of points of compliance.
52. Tier 3 Evaluation. A risk-based analysis
to develop values for potential direct and indirect exposure pathways at the
exposure point based on site-specific conditions.
53. UST. Underground Storage Tank, as defined
in Regulation 61-92.280.12.
54.
Wellhead Protection Area. A Department approved area surrounding public water
supply wells that is designed to protect the wells from threats by: 1) direct
introduction of chemicals of concern in the immediate well area, 2) microbial
contaminant, and 3) chemicals of concern.
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. South Carolina may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.