(4)
Documentation of compliance with 264.1033 shall include the following
information:
(i) A list of all information
references and sources used in preparing the documentation.
(ii) Records, including the dates, of each
compliance test required by 264.1033(k).
(iii) If engineering calculations are used, a
design analysis, specifications, drawings, schematics, and piping and
instrumentation diagrams based on the appropriate sections of APTI Course 415:
Control of Gaseous Emissions (incorporated by reference as specified in 260.11)
or other engineering texts acceptable to the Department that present basic
control device design information. Documentation provided by the control device
manufacturer or vendor that describes the control device design in accordance
with paragraphs (b)(4)(iii)(A) through (b)(4)(iii)(G) of this section may be
used to comply with this requirement. The design analysis shall address the
vent stream characteristics and control device operation parameters as
specified below.
(A) For a thermal vapor
incinerator, the design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition,
constituent concentrations, and flow rate. The design analysis shall also
establish the design minimum and average temperature in the combustion zone and
the combustion zone residence time.
(B) For a catalytic vapor incinerator, the
design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition, constituent
concentrations, and flow rate. The design analysis shall also establish the
design minimum and average temperatures across the catalyst bed inlet and
outlet.
(C) For a boiler or process
heater, the design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition,
constituent concentrations, and flow rate. The design analysis shall also
establish the design minimum and average flame zone temperatures, combustion
zone residence time, and description of method and location where the vent
stream is introduced into the combustion zone.
(D) For a flare, the design analysis shall
consider the vent stream composition, constituent concentrations, and flow
rate. The design analysis shall also consider the requirements specified in
264.1033(d).
(E) For a condenser,
the design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition, constituent
concentrations, flow rate, relative humidity, and temperature. The design
analysis shall also establish the design outlet organic compound concentration
level, design average temperature of the condenser exhaust vent stream, and
design average temperatures of the coolant fluid at the condenser inlet and
outlet.
(F) For a carbon adsorption
system such as a fixed bed adsorber that regenerates the carbon bed directly
onsite in the control device, the design analysis shall consider the vent
stream composition, constituent concentrations, flow rate, relative humidity,
and temperature. The design analysis shall also establish the design exhaust
vent stream organic compound concentration level, number and capacity of carbon
beds, type and working capacity of activated carbon used for carbon beds,
design total steam flow over the period of each complete carbon bed
regeneration cycle, duration of the carbon bed steaming and cooling/drying
cycles, design carbon bed temperature after regeneration, design carbon bed
regeneration time, and design service life of carbon.
(G) For a carbon adsorption system such as a
carbon canister that does not regenerate the carbon bed directly onsite in the
control device, the design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition,
constituent concentrations, flow rate, relative humidity, and temperature. The
design analysis shall also establish the design outlet organic concentration
level, capacity of carbon bed, type and working capacity of activated carbon
used for carbon bed, and design carbon replacement interval based on the total
carbon working capacity of the control device and source operating
schedule.
(iv) A
statement signed and dated by the owner or operator certifying that the
operating parameters used in the design analysis reasonably represent the
conditions that exist when the hazardous waste management unit is or would be
operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to
occur.
(v) A statement signed and
dated by the owner or operator certifying that the control device is designed
to operate at an efficiency of 95 percent or greater unless the total organic
concentration limit of 264.1032(a) is achieved at an efficiency less than 95
weight percent or the total organic emission limits of 264.1032(a) for affected
process vents at the facility can be attained by a control device involving
vapor recovery at an efficiency less than 95 weight percent. A statement
provided by the control device manufacturer or vendor certifying that the
control equipment meets the design specifications may be used to comply with
this requirement.
(vi) If
performance tests are used to demonstrate compliance, all test
results.