D.
Additional conditions applicable to specific categories of Engineering Reports.
1. Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Minor
modifications to wastewater treatment facilities may be exempt from the engineering
report provisions.
a. Comprehensive Description of
Proposed Project.
(1) This section shall include
the name of the project or facility to be served and the person directly responsible
(owner). The proposed wastewater treatment facility or modification shall be
described in detail to include all unit operation and processes to be employed, and
the handling and ultimate disposal of all liquid and solid wastes from the
wastewater treatment facility. A reasonable estimate based on professional
engineering judgment shall be provided for removing or reducing constituents in the
influent wastewater to the proposed wastewater treatment facility.
(2) A flow diagram of the proposed wastewater
treatment facility or modification shall be provided with the project description
section of the Engineering Report. Such diagrams shall identify any bypass line or
structures to bypass flow around treatment units.
(3) The project description section shall also
include a discussion of the proposed treatment method as it relates to compliance
with any discharge permit, administrative order, or other legal requirements
applicable to the wastewater treatment facility.
b. Description of Waste. This section shall
include the type of waste expected, such as domestic, industrial, or combined
(industrial and domestic), and a list of all major sources of waste. A combined
waste shall be described in terms of the relative proportions of domestic and
industrial flows based on volume and strength (BOD5 and COD or TOC). Where
industrial waste is involved, this section shall contain the primary four (4) digit
Standard Industrial Code number for the industry and a brief description of the
process as to the type of waste generated, the relative volumes, and the frequency
of discharge.
c. Characteristics of
Waste. The characteristics of the raw waste shall include but not be limited to the
following items:
(1) Flow.
(a) Applicable flow values shall be measured where
flow exists (i.e. wastewater treatment facility being upgraded but not expanded for
additional volume). Flow (daily total and daily variations) shall include:
(i) Monthly average;
(ii) Minimum;
(iii) Daily maximum; and
(iv) Peak hourly.
(b) Where flow does not exist, or additional flow
is proposed, a reasonable estimate of the characteristics of the proposed waste
shall be supported based on the following criteria:
(i) Domestic Waste. Based on contributory
population as referenced to the type of facility to be served, as stated in 61-67
Appendix A.
(ii) Industrial Waste. May
be based on:
(aa) Comparison of waste
characteristics from similar processes; and,
(bb) Relative use of industrial process chemicals
and process water.
(2) Solids. Solids parameters shall be measured
where flow exists. Where flows are proposed, the normal characteristics of domestic
waste are acceptable. Comparative or literature cited values may be acceptable for
industrial flows (or domestic facilities with significant industrial contributions).
The following shall be evaluated:
(a)
Settleable;
(b) Suspended;
(c) Dissolved; and,
(d) Floating, such as oils and greases.
(3) Strength of the Waste. An estimate
of the total oxygen demand such as the Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) shall be
provided where industrial wastes are involved in part or in total. The average
values coupled with diurnal and seasonal fluctuations, measured or anticipated,
shall be provided in the engineering evaluation and design of the wastewater
treatment facility where such fluctuations effect compliance with the proposed
effluent disposal permit limitations. For domestic facilities with significant
industrial contribution, the design shall account for additional industrial loading
(e.g., higher strength of waste). This evaluation shall include:
(a) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD, five (5) day,
twenty (20) degree C); and
(b) Chemical
Oxygen Demand (COD).
(4)
Color (True and/or apparent).
(a) Source and
causative agent(s);
(b) Variations;
and,
(c) Treatability.
(5) pH (measured or anticipated
fluctuations shall be provided).
(6)
Alkalinity (Total and Phenolphthalein).
(7) Heavy Metals, Noxious, Toxic or Hazardous
Compounds - Identification and Concentrations.
(8) Materials Resistant to Biological Degradation
- Materials (e.g., Polyvinyl Alcohol) shall be identified and average concentrations
(measured or anticipated) shall be provided.
(9) Surfactants, such as Methylene Blue Active
Substances, or others.
(10) Phosphorous
(total), Nitrogen (total), BOD:N:P Ratio and BOD:COD:TOC Ratio - Industrial Waters
Only.
(11) Provide information on other
chemical, physical, and/or biological parameters of importance in the design,
evaluation, and successful operation of the proposed wastewater treatment facility
otherwise not addressed in items one (1) through ten (10) above.
(12) A list of the industrial process chemicals
that may affect the quality of the effluent shall be incorporated into the
Engineering Report, where possible, and be accompanied by toxicity levels when such
toxicity values have been reported in the literature (as applicable with domestic
facilities with significant industrial contributions).
(13) Section
48-1-270
of the Pollution Control Act states in part: "Upon a showing satisfactory to the
Department by any person that records, reports or information, or particular parts
thereof, other than effluent or emission data, if made public would divulge methods
or processes entitled to protection as trade secrets of such person, the Department
shall consider such record, report or information or particular portion thereof
confidential in the administration of this Chapter". If the Engineering Report
submitted to this Department contains information or material reasonably considered
by the owner of the proposed facility to be privileged information, the confidential
portions of the Engineering Report shall be stamped "Confidential".
d. Treatability of Waste. This section
shall include a discussion of the treatability of the wastewater based, where
applicable, on treatability studies (pilot or bench scale) or secondarily, on a
discussion of the literature concerning the treatability of the wastewater. Data
from existing operating wastewater treatment facilities, which have similar
wastewater and treatment systems as the proposed wastewater treatment facility, may
also be used. Sufficient data shall be provided to show that the facilities are
comparable, including influent and effluent characteristics. All literature
referenced shall be cited and pertinent information quoted or provided. A conclusion
shall be included as to the selected method of treatment and anticipated quality and
characteristics of the effluent as identified by information provided pursuant to
these provisions. Sludges generated by the proposed treatment system shall be
characterized, and a specific method for treatment and disposal of these sludges
(consistent with other Department regulations governing sludges) shall be presented.
This section shall also address the feasibility and/or anticipated plans for
segregating process wastewater for treatment, substitution of biodegradable for
non-biodegradable process materials, substitution of non-toxic for toxic materials,
and of recycle of a fraction or the whole of wastewater flows.
e. Location of Subject Area and Point of
Discharge. This section shall include a description of the proposed wastewater
treatment facility location and the proposed point of discharge (give latitude and
longitude) located on an appropriate map and referenced to named roads, physical
sketch plan of receiving waters, and the existing wastewater treatment facility (if
applicable). Such a map layout shall enable persons unfamiliar with the proposed
areas to locate the site. Pretreatment facilities shall provide on a map the
location of the connection of their sewer line(s) to the sewer line or wastewater
treatment facility accepting their wastewater in lieu of the receiving waters.
Projects with land application of effluent or sludge shall provide maps of the
location(s) of each site.
f. Physical
Characteristics of Proposed Site. This section is applicable only to those projects
proposing waste handling units and procedures which are directly influenced by local
soil/groundwater characteristics. These projects include, but are not limited to,
spray irrigation, absorption trench disposal, earthen containment and infiltration
basins, composting, drip irrigation, and land application of sludge sites. The
following shall be evaluated:
(1) Soil type(s) and
their distribution (U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service
Report);
(2) Percolation test results
and a map showing their location (include test procedure);
(3) Drainage characteristics of surrounding area
to include, but not limited to, a USGS topographic map, where available, aerial
photo, and flood elevations;
(4)
Distance(s) to nearby wastewater treatment facilities, property lines, inhabited
structures, streams, waterbodies, and drainage ways;
(5) Location and description of nearest water
wells;
(6) Shallowest seasonal depth of
water table and soil description to first impermeable layer;
(7) Exact location of land system;
(8) Design calculation for the system;
(9) Location of right of ways, such as pipelines,
and power lines;
(10) Proposed
location(s) and description of groundwater monitoring well(s), where necessary;
and,
(11) Location of buffer zones for
spraying effluent (consistent with R.61-9.505).
g. General Layout of Area(s) to be Served [where
applicable, e.g., subdivisions].
h.
Receiving Waters. The following shall be evaluated:
(1) Include name of all immediate and downstream
receiving waters in such detail as to allow actual identification on a USGS
quadrangle map. Pretreatment facilities shall include the name of the POTW or other
facility accepting their wastewater and the receiving facility's effluent disposal
permit number and ultimate receiving waters. Items identified in
subsections67.200.D.1.h. (2), 67.200.D.1.h. (3), and 67.200.D.1.h. (4) below are not
required for pretreatment facilities.
(2) If not determined by the Department, the 7Q10
(or other applicable flow information) shall be provided and referenced to the
information source. Where published information is not available, any currently
published method of computing the 7Q10 by comparative or synthetic means may be
acceptable. However, a description of the method employed and justification for the
value derived shall be incorporated in this section. This information is not
required for non-process wastewater discharges.
(3) Chemical and biological characteristics of
receiving waters. This information may be obtained from the Department, when such
information exists, for the proposed receiving waters in the vicinity of the
proposed point of discharge. In the absence of adequate information on record
concerning receiving stream conditions, the owner, through its engineer, has the
responsibility of supplying this information in the Engineering Report. When the
Department determines that additional stream information is needed, a sampling
program shall be established by the owner, through its engineer, in accordance with
specific guidance provided by the Department.
(4) Consideration shall be given to the zone of
influence, as defined by the consultant, regarding contravention of water quality
standards. Water usages to be considered shall include, but are not limited to, the
following. Unless otherwise indicated at the preapplication conference the items
listed below shall be located on a separate map:
(a) Downstream water supply intakes (potable and
non-potable);
(b) Downstream swimming
areas;
(c) Downstream water
impoundments;
(d) Shellfish areas;
and,
(e) Names of other wastewater
treatment facilities discharging to receiving waters both upstream and downstream
which may have or tend to have an effect on the stream segment under
consideration.
i.
Impact of Discharge on Receiving Waters. Water quality assessments and water quality
modeling are the responsibility of the person requesting the Department's approval
of a project. In some cases, the Department will provide these services. This
section applies to all domestic discharges and those industrial facilities (except
pretreatment facilities) whose wastewaters are expected to exhibit an oxygen demand
on the receiving waters or as determined by the Department. This section shall
contain a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the effects of the proposed
discharge on the receiving stream. This determination shall consist of the projected
effect the discharge shall have on the dissolved oxygen content of the receiving
stream (e.g., dissolved oxygen profile of the stream). Stream models may not be
completely applicable to small streams, intermittent streams and sluggish or
impounded waters. The situation and surrounding facts shall be made known in the
pre-design conference at which time a mutual decision may be made as to the best
manner in which the impact on the receiving waters can be determined based on the
current available technology and techniques. Consulting engineers and the permittees
shall recognize the importance of the impact assessment and that, in some cases, a
thorough stream study to be conducted by the owner through the consulting engineer
may be required. Quantitative assessments shall be presented as to the anticipated
concentrations of phenols, heavy metals, pesticides, herbicides, solids, petroleum
byproducts, and other materials significant in nature, in the receiving stream after
adequate mixing of the discharge with the design stream flow. This section shall
also qualitatively address the effect the proposed discharge shall have on the
parameter for which standards have been established (R.61-68) such as the pH, fecal coliform
concentration, and nutrient levels in the receiving waters.
j. Equipment and Service Failure or Shutdown. This
section shall address the expected results of individual equipment or process
failure or shutdown for maintenance of each major component within the system and
for each major utility service. Major components include, (where applicable) but are
not limited to, the following: lift station pump(s), clarifiers, aeration devices,
disinfection devices, return sludge pumps, and tertiary treatment devices. Major
utility services are considered to be, but are not limited to, electrical power and
natural gas. The discussion shall also reflect consideration of those design
measures which have been incorporated in the proposal or those that could be
employed to eliminate or reduce the adverse effects of such failure or shutdown.
This section shall discuss major problems that may exist upon failure or shutdown of
each major component or utility service with regard to the following:
(1) Quality of effluent to be
discharged;
(2) Effect on receiving
waters;
(3) Creation of health related
problems;
(4) Creation of nuisance
conditions; and,
(5) Creation of
hazardous conditions to operator(s) or public.
k. Alternatives Analysis and Consolidation of
Facilities.
(1) In accordance with R.61-68 rules on anti-degradation, the
Department shall consider 67.200.D.1.k. (1)(a) and 67.200.D.1.k. (1)(b) below when
evaluating any proposed expansion or new discharge to waters of the State that will
lower water quality to a measurable effect. This includes, but is not limited to,
the new or increased loading of any pollutant or pollutant parameter in the effluent
regardless of whether the discharge flow changes.
(a) An alternatives analysis, conducted by the
applicant, must demonstrate to the Department that none of the following applicable
alternatives that would minimize or eliminate the lowering of water quality are
economically and technologically reasonable:
(i)
water recycle or reuse;
(ii) use of
other discharge locations;
(iii)
connection to other wastewater treatment facilities;
(iv) use of land application;
(v) product or raw material substitution;
and
(vi) any other treatment option or
alternative.
(b) After the
alternatives analysis is completed, the Department shall evaluate whether a proposed
discharge that will result in the lowering of water quality of a waterbody, and for
which there are no economically or technologically reasonable alternatives, is
necessary for important economic or social development. For this to be accomplished,
several economic and social factors must be considered. If an evaluation of the
economic and social factors reveals that affordable treatment options that, combined
with any alternatives, would prevent the need for the lowering of water quality, the
Department shall deny the request. Conformance of the proposed discharge with the
applicable 208 Areawide Water Quality Management Plans may demonstrate importance to
economic and social development as well as intergovernmental coordination and public
participation. Activities requiring permits or certification by the Department shall
provide for public participation through the Department's existing public
notification processes. Economic and social factors to be considered may include the
following:
(i) employment (increases, maintenance,
or avoidance of reduction);
(ii)
increased industrial production;
(iii)
improved community tax base;
(iv)
improved housing; and/or
(v) correction
of an environmental or public health problem.
(2) Consolidation of Facilities. In some
instances, where wastewater treatment facilities are proposed, there are other
wastewater treatment facilities, either proposed or existing, that could incorporate
and treat the waste flows from the subject establishment, subdivision or industry.
This section of the Engineering Report shall address requirements of the applicable
208 Water Quality Management Plan.
l. Pretreatment Facilities. For pretreatment
facilities, a copy of the acceptance letter from the treatment facility accepting
the wastewater and a copy of the pretreatment permit or industrial user permit, as
applicable, issued by the POTW or other treatment facility accepting the wastewater,
shall be provided to the Department.
2. Wastewater Collection and Transmission
Facilities. Because of the nature of most collection/transmission systems a detailed
Engineering Report is not usually required, unless specifically required by the
Department. If required by the Department, the Engineering Report shall be submitted
to the Department's appropriate wastewater division, along with the proposed plans
for the collection system. This report shall include, but not be limited to, the
following:
a. A description of the area, facility
or establishment the proposed collection/transmission system is to serve to include
the name of the facility(s), the number of connections, computations of flows,
location of the facility, and owner of the proposed collection/transmission
system.
b. A description of the
wastewater facilities to service the proposed system to include the name, location,
and permit number for the wastewater treatment facility; the present hydraulic load
(average and peak flows); identification and permit numbers of other
collection/transmission systems served or that are permitted to feed into the
facility; and actual performance of the existing wastewater treatment facility under
the present loading conditions. Performance figures to include removal efficiencies
for BOD and suspended solids (and other parameters of importance to subject
wastewater treatment facility evaluation) as measured or as extracted from current
composite facility operating records.
c.
A letter, addressed to the Department, prepared by the owner of the wastewater
treatment facility agreeing to accept and provide treatment for the waste flow from
the proposed collection/transmission system.
d. A description of potential problems that could
be reasonably anticipated (e.g., power failure or pump shutdown in lift stations),
possible health, nuisance, or hazardous conditions that may result, possible adverse
effects on nearby streams, and what measures are proposed to prevent such problems
and to protect streams, property, and the public during any shutdown
periods.
e. An updated, overall plan of
collection/transmission system(s) with each submittal (especially appropriate where
phase development is being practiced).