Current through Register Vol. 48, No. 9, September 27, 2024
1.11.1 Assessment.
Assessment of civil penalties shall be based on the following criteria:
1.11.1.1 The seriousness of the
violation(s);
1.11.1.2 Previous
compliance history;
1.11.1.3 The amount
necessary to deter future violations;
1.11.1.4 Efforts to correct the violation;
and
1.11.1.5 Any other mitigating or
enhancing factors.
1.11.2
Severity Levels. The seriousness of violations shall be categorized by one of the
following severity levels.
1.11.2.1 Major.
Violations that are most significant and have a direct negative impact on
occupational or public health and safety, or which represent a significant deviation
from the requirements of this regulation.
1.11.2.2 Moderate. Violations that are of more
than minor significance, but if left uncorrected, could lead to more serious
circumstances, or which represent a moderate deviation from the requirements of this
regulation.
1.11.2.3 Minor. Violations
that are of minor safety significance, or which represent a minor deviation from the
requirements of this regulation.
1.11.2.4 In each case, the severity of a violation
will be characterized at the level best suited to the significance of the particular
violation. In some cases, violations may be evaluated in the aggregate and a single
severity level assigned for a group of violations.
1.11.3 Application. Adjustments to the values
listed in RHC 1.11.4.1 under each severity level may be made for the presence or
absence of the following factors:
1.11.3.1 Prompt
Identification and Reporting. Reduction of a civil penalty may be given when a
registrant identifies the violation and promptly reports the violation to the
Department. In weighing this factor, consideration will be given to, among other
things, the length of time the violation existed prior to discovery, the opportunity
available to discover the violation, the ease of discovery and the promptness and
completeness of any required report. No consideration will be given to this factor
if the registrant does not take immediate action to correct the problem upon
discovery.
1.11.3.2 Corrective Action to
Prevent Recurrence. Recognizing that corrective action is always required to meet
regulatory requirements, the promptness and extent to which the registrant takes
corrective action, including actions to prevent recurrence, may be considered in
modifying the civil penalty to be assessed. Unusually prompt and extensive
corrective action may result in reducing the proposed civil penalty. On the other
hand, the civil penalty may be increased if initiation of corrective action is not
prompt or if the corrective action is only minimally acceptable. In weighing this
factor, consideration will be given to, among other things, the timeliness of the
corrective action, degree of registrant initiative, and comprehensiveness of the
corrective action - such as whether the action is focused narrowly to the specific
violation or broadly to the general area of concern.
1.11.3.3 Compliance History. Reduction of the
civil penalty may be given for prior good performance in the general area of
concern. In weighing this factor, consideration will be given to, among other
things, the effectiveness of previous corrective action for similar problems,
overall performance such as previous compliance history in the area of concern. For
example, failure to implement previous corrective action for prior similar problems
may result in an increase in the civil penalty.
1.11.3.4 Prior Notice of Similar Events. The civil
penalty may be increased for cases where the registrant had prior knowledge of a
problem as a result of a registrant audit, or specific industry notification, and
had failed to take effective preventive steps.
1.11.3.5 Multiple Occurrences. The civil penalty
may be increased where multiple examples of a particular violation are identified
during the inspection period.
1.11.3.6
The above factors are additive. However, the civil penalty will not exceed
twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for any one violation. Each day of
noncompliance shall constitute a separate violation.
1.11.4 The Department shall issue civil penalties
according to the following schedule:
1.11.4.1
Penalty Matrix
Deviation from Requirement:
|
Major
|
Moderate
|
Minor
|
Potential for Harm:
|
(11-30)
|
(4-10)
|
(1-3)
|
$25,000-5,000
|
$15,000-5,000
|
$10,000-2,500
|
Major
|
(11-70)
|
$10,000-2,500
|
$7,500-1,000
|
$5,000-500
|
Moderate
|
(6-10)
|
$5,000-1,000
|
$3,000-500
|
$2,500-250
|
Minor
|
(0-5)
|
Calculation of Base Penalty:
Each violation is assigned a relative point value as follows:
Potential for Harm- 0-70, with 70 being maximum harm; Deviation from Requirement-
1-30, with 30 being the maximum deviation. Add the two values together, convert to a
decimal value (15 to .15, for example), and multiply by the maximum per day per
violation per civil penalty ($25,000). This is the base civil penalty per violation.
The base penalty may be increased for repeat violations, multi-day penalties, or
degree of recalcitrance, willfulness, negligence, or indifference.
Minimum Increase for Repeat Violations Found on Follow-up
Inspections or Reinspections
Second Offense (First Follow-up Inspection or First
Reinspection)
|
15%
|
Third Offense (Second Follow-up Inspection or Second
Reinspection)
|
30%
|
Fourth Offense (Third Follow-up Inspection or Third
Reinspection)
|
45%
|
Fifth and Subsequent Offenses
|
60%
|
Multi-Day Penalties:
Increase penalty 1% to 7% for each day of noncompliance.
Degree of Recalcitrance, Willfulness, Negligence, or
Indifference:
Increase Penalty 10% to 50%.
1.11.4.2 The Department reserves the right to
impose a civil penalty up to Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) on a person who
violates the regulations in such a manner so as to present an imminent hazard to
human health and safety. The Twenty-five Thousand Dollar civil penalty may be levied
for the following:
1.11.4.2.1 Two or more
incidents of workers receiving excess radiation exposures, when such exposures are
contrary to the occupational dose limits for adults as set forth in the provisions
of Part III of R.61-64, X-Rays (Title B).
1.11.4.2.2 Two or more incidents of members of the
general public, or non-radiation workers, receiving excess radiation exposures
contrary to the dose limits for individual members of the public as set forth in the
provisions of Part III of R.61-64, X-Rays (Title B).
1.11.4.2.3 Two or more incidents on two
consecutive inspections of failing to perform required surveys, tests, checks,
calibrations or evaluations. (RHC 1.4)
1.11.4.2.4 Four or more incidents in a one year
period of making, selling, leasing, transferring, lending, assembling, or installing
equipment without the equipment meeting all applicable regulations when properly
placed in operation. (RHC 2.5.3)