Current through Register Vol. 48, No. 9, September 27, 2024
For the purpose of determining GEP stack heights and other
parameters applicable to modeling, the following definitions and conditions
apply.
A. Stack "in existence"--A
stack on which the owner or operator had (1) begun, or caused to begin, a
continuous program of physical on-site construction or (2) entered into binding
agreements or contractual obligations which could not be cancelled or modified
without substantial loss to the owner or operator to undertake a program of
construction to be completed in a reasonable time.
B. "Dispersion Technique"
1. Any technique which attempts to affect the
concentration of a pollutant in the ambient air by:
a. Using that portion of a stack which
exceeds good engineering practice stack height;
b. Varying the rate of emission of a
pollutant according to atmospheric conditions or ambient concentrations of that
pollutant; or
c. Increasing final
exhaust gas plume rise by manipulating source process parameters, exhaust gas
parameters, stack parameters, or combining exhaust gases from several existing
stacks into one stack; or other selective handling of exhaust gas streams so as
to increase the exhaust gas plume rise.
2. Paragraphs 1a, b, and c above do not
include:
a. The reheating of a gas stream,
following use of a pollution control system for the purpose of returning the
gas to the temperature at which it was originally discharged from the source
generating the gas stream;
b. The
merging of exhaust gas streams where:
(i) The
source owner or operator demonstrates that the process was originally designed
and constructed with such merged gas streams;
(ii) After July 8, 1985 such merging is part
of a change in operation at the plant that includes the installation of
pollution controls and is accompanied by a net reduction in the allowable
emissions of a pollutant. This exclusion from the definition of "dispersion
techniques" applies only to the emission limitation for the pollutant affected
by such change in operation; or
(iii) Before July 8, 1985 such merging was
part of a change in operation at the plant that included the installation of
emissions control equipment or was carried out for sound economic or
engineering reasons. Where there was an increase in the emission limitation or,
in the event that no emission limitation was in existence prior to the merging,
an increase in the quantity of pollutants actually emitted prior to the
merging, the Department shall presume that merging was significantly motivated
by an intent to gain emissions credit for greater dispersion. Without a
demonstration by the source owner or operator that merging was not
significantly motivated by such intent, the Department shall deny credit for
the effects of such merging in calculating the allowable emissions for the
source;
c. Smoke
management in agricultural or silvicultural prescribed burning
programs;
d. Episodic restrictions
on residential woodburning and open burning; or
e. Techniques which increase final exhaust
gas plume rise where the resulting allowable emissions of sulfur dioxide from
the plant do not exceed 5,000 tons per year.
C. "Good Engineering Practice" (GEP) Stack
Height--The greater of:
1. 65 meters,
measured from the ground-level elevation at the base of the stack;
2. Hg=H+" 1.5L,
where
Hg = good engineering practice stack
height, measured from the ground-level elevation at the base of the
stack,
H = height of nearby structure(s) measured from the
ground-level elevation at the base of the stack,
L = lesser dimension, height or projected width of nearby
structure(s)
The Department or EPA may require the use of a field study or
fluid model to verify GEP stack height for the source; or
3. The height demonstrated by a fluid model
or a field study approved by the Department and EPA which ensures that the
emissions from a stack do not result in excessive concentrations of any air
pollutant as a result of atmospheric downwash, wakes, or eddy effects created
by the source itself, nearby structures or nearby terrain features.
D. "Nearby"--
1. For the purpose of applying the formula
provided in paragraph C.2.above, nearby means that distance up to five times
the lesser of the height or the width of a structure, but not greater than 0.8
km ( 1/2 mile), and
2. For
conducting demonstrations under paragraph C.3. above, nearby means not greater
than 0.8 km ( 1/2 mile), except that a portion of a terrain feature may be
considered "nearby" when:
a. at a distance of
0.8 km ( 1/2 mile) from the stack the height of the feature is at least 40% of
the GEP (as determined by the formula in paragraph C.2. above) or 26 meters,
whichever is greater; and,
b. the
portion of the terrain feature must be within 10 times the maximum height of
the feature, but not more than 2 miles, from the stack.
All heights are measured from the ground-level elevation at
the base of the stack.
E. "Excessive Concentration"--For the purpose
of determining good engineering practice stack height under C.3. above.
1. For sources seeking credit for stack
height exceeding that established under C.2. above, excessive concentration
means a maximum ground-level concentration resulting from stack emissions which
are due in whole or part to downwash, wakes, and eddy effects produced by
nearby structures or nearby terrain features which is at least 40 percent in
excess of the maximum concentration experienced in the absence of such
downwash, wakes, or eddy effects and which contributes to a total concentration
due to emissions from all sources that is greater than an ambient air quality
standard;
2. For sources seeking
credit for stack height exceeding that established under C.2. above, and where
such sources are subject to the Prevention of Significant Deterioration
program, excessive concentration means a maximum ground-level concentration
resulting from stack emissions which are due in whole or part to downwash,
wakes, or eddy effects produced by nearby structures or nearby terrain features
which is at least 40 percent in excess of the maximum concentration experienced
in the absence of such downwash, wakes, or eddy effects and greater than a
Prevention of Significant Deterioration increment.
3. The allowable emission rate to be used in
making demonstrations under E.1 or E.2 shall be prescribed by the new source
performance standard that is applicable to the source category unless the owner
or operator demonstrates that this emission rate is infeasible. Where such
demonstrations are approved by the Department, an alternative emission rate
shall be established in consultation with the source owner or
operator;
4. For sources seeking
credit after October 11, 1983, for increases in existing stack heights up to
the heights established under paragraph C.2. above, excessive concentration
means either:
a. a maximum ground-level
concentration due in whole or part to downwash, wakes or eddy effects as
provided in E.1. or 2. above, except that the emission rate specified by any
applicable Regulation (or, in the absence of such a limit, the actual emission
rate) shall be used; or
b. the
actual presence of a local nuisance caused by the existing stack as determined
by the Department; and
5. For sources seeking credit after January
12, 1979 for a stack height determined under C.2. above where the Department
requires the use of a field study or fluid model to verify GEP stack height,
for sources seeking stack height credit after November 9, 1984 based on the
aerodynamic influence of cooling towers, and for sources seeking stack height
credit after December 31, 1970 based on the aerodynamic influence of structures
not adequately represented by the equation in C.2. above, excessive
concentration means a maximum ground-level concentration due in whole or part
to downwash, wakes or eddy effects that is at least 40 percent in excess of the
maximum concentration experienced in the absence of such downwash, wakes, or
eddy effects.