Current through September 18, 2024
A. Public Competitive Sealed Bids. Sealed
written competitive bids shall be required for purchase orders exceeding the
amount provided by R.I. Gen. Laws §
37-2-22 unless it is determined in
writing that this method is not practicable or that the best value for the
state may be obtained by using an electronic reverse auction as set forth in
R.I. Gen. Laws §
37-2-18.1. Bids governing highway and bridge construction
projects shall be governed by these regulations, except as otherwise provided
for in §
5.13 of this Part entitled "Bids Governing Highway and Bridge
Construction Projects" and Part 12 of this Subchapter entitled "Rhode Island
Department of Transportation Projects."
1. The
term "immediately" for contracts awarded pursuant to R.I. Gen. Laws
§§
37-2-18(a) through (h)"Competitive Sealed Bidding" and this
regulation shall mean that a copy of the redacted bid proposal shall be
available for public inspection by the close of business the day the subject
bid(s) and/or contract(s) is opened by the division of purchases.
2. Bidders shall bear the sole and exclusive
responsibility to provide a public copies of bids to the division of purchases,
for public inspection. At the time that a proposal is submitted, a bidder must
submit a redacted copy of the bid proposal on a readable CD-R Media Disk
(hereinafter referred to as a "CD"). Failure of the bidder to submit a public
copy on a readable CD, as required by R.I. Gen. Laws §
37-2-18 as amended,
may result in the disqualification of said bid. Failure by a bidder to redact
from the public copy trade secrets, commercial or financial information or
other information the bidder deems not subject to public disclosure shall
subject said information to public disclosure.
3. In order to comply with the public copy
requirement, a bidder, at the time that a proposal is submitted, must submit a
redacted copy of the bid proposal on a readable CD and in accordance with the
solicitation. The CD should contain: the title of the solicitation as it
appears on the RIVIP cover letter; the name of the company and vendor
identification as it appears on the RIVIP cover letter; the bid response number
as it appears on the RIVIP cover letter; and the date of the bid as it appears
on the RIVIP cover letter. Failure to provide the division of purchases with a
readable CD with the above-cited information, as required, may result in the
disqualification of the bid.
B. Formal Competitive Bids.
1. Except under emergency circumstances,
competitive bids shall be obtained in the form of sealed written quotations for
all procurements exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), and except as
otherwise provided for pursuant to R.I. Gen. Laws §§
37-2-18(a)
through (h)"Competitive Sealed Bidding."
2. A formal bid shall be distinguished by:
a. A specific date and time by which sealed
written bids must be submitted;
b.
An opening of all bids at a specified time at the Division of
Purchases;
c. The solicitation of a
minimum of three selected bidders who are potential suppliers for the commodity
or service to be procured.
3. All Formal Competitive bids shall be
issued by the Division of Purchases.
C. Informal Competitive Bids.
1. Oral quotations (including telephone) may
be solicited for purchase orders with a value less than one thousand dollars
($1,000). If the Division of Purchases is unable to verify prices using
published lists/catalogs or by market analysis, the lowest quotation obtained
by telephone solicitation for procurements exceeding two hundred and fifty
dollars ($250) shall be confirmed in writing.
2. An informal bid shall be distinguished by:
a. Lack of a specific time by which bids must
be submitted;
b. Lack of sealed
written bids; quotes may be oral on the spot or by telephone and confirmed at a
later date in writing;
c. Lack of
an opening and reading of bids;
d.
The solicitation of selected registered or unregistered bidders who are
potential suppliers for the commodity or service to be procured and/or vendors
suggested for consideration by the user agency.
3. Informal bids shall be solicited from a
minimum of three suppliers.
4. All
informal bid invitations shall be conducted in such fashion as to maximize the
opportunity for participation of all responsible suppliers.
5. For those purchases not affected by
regional considerations, requests for quotations (RFQ's) shall be distributed
equitably among various responsible suppliers. Where practical, a quotation
will be solicited from other than the previous supplier prior to placing a
repeat order.
6. When informal
competitive bids are received in accordance with the provisions contained
herein and award is not made to the low bidder, the Purchase Order File shall
be annotated with statements of how the supplier was selected and why the price
is fair and reasonable.
7.
Purchasing management shall audit the use of informal competitive bids. As a
minimum, quarterly review of performance by buyers should be conducted to
sample (on a random basis) the reasonableness and effectiveness of buyer use
and documentation of the informal bid process.
D. Requests for Proposal
1. Requests for Proposal (RFP) shall be
utilized to solicit competitive offers in all cases where:
a. Lowest price is not the sole or primary
consideration to be used in determining an award; or
b. Performance is neither specific nor
objective, and open to the offerer's interpretation; or
c. It is otherwise anticipated that offers
may be substantially different and that there is insufficient common ground for
objective comparison; or
d. It is
anticipated that changes will be made after proposals are opened and that the
nature of the proposals and/or prices offered will be negotiated prior to
award.
2. Wherever
possible, the Request for Proposal shall define the performance or benefit
required and shall set forth specific criteria to be utilized in evaluation of
offers.
3. Offers shall be
evaluated by a committee comprised of a representative of the Division of
Purchases, representative of the user agency, and other appropriate parties on
the basis of:
a. The qualifications of the
offerers, established by professional accomplishment and previous
experience;
b. Aspects of offers
which provide benefit, other than those based on cost; and
c. Other provisions of offers which are
determined to serve the best interests of the State.
4. Nothing herein shall be construed to
preclude the possibility of determining an award solely on the basis of
cost.
5. The evaluation of offers,
including the weight assigned to various aspects of the offerers, and all award
determinations, including the reasons for a selection recommendation, shall be
fully documented.