Pennsylvania Code
Title 210 - APPELLATE PROCEDURE
Part II - INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURES
Chapter 65 - OPERATING PROCEDURES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
MOTIONS PRACTICE
Section 65.21 - Motions Review Subject to Single Judge Disposition

Universal Citation: 210 PA Code ยง 65.21

Current through Register Vol. 54, No. 44, November 2, 2024

A. Except as otherwise provided in § 65.22, a single judge of this Court, whether commissioned or specially assigned, may entertain and may grant or deny any request for relief which under the Rules of Appellate Procedure may properly be sought. A party may file an answer to an application, Pa.R.A.P. 123(b); a speaking application shall be verified unless the interest of justice requires action without it, Pa.R.A.P. 123(c); oral argument will not be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Pa.R.A.P. 123(d). The action of a single judge may be reviewed by the Court.

Comment :

Section 65. 21(A) merely reaffirms the procedure codified in Pa.R.A.P. 123. A single judge may grant or deny relief requested by a proper application, Pa.R.A.P. 123(e). However, the Court may by order or rule provide that an application or class of applications must be acted upon by the Court.

B. All petitions for extension of time shall be referred by the Prothonotary to the motions judge. Such petitions should be acted upon as soon as possible unless the motion judge feels an answer is necessary.

1. Petitions for extension shall be granted only on cause shown and in any event the filing of the brief is required, particularly in criminal cases, even though the right to argue is lost. However, if the petition for extension is accompanied by a substantive motion, such as a motion to quash, remand, or withdraw, Central Legal Staff shall review the motion in an expeditious manner pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 65.21(D).

2. Notwithstanding any contrary procedures set forth above, all petitions for extension of time to file a brief in cases designated Children's Fast Track or Other Family Fast Track, upon receipt by the Prothonotary, shall be sent to Central Legal Staff for processing. All such petitions shall be presented to a motions judge for disposition within three days of receipt of the petition by Central Legal Staff. Petitions for extension of time to file a brief in Children's Fast Track or Other Family Fast Track cases shall be granted only upon a showing of good cause and extraordinary circumstances. Extensions for time should rarely be granted, and when granted should rarely be for a period in excess of seven days.

C. All other motions, petitions or applications for relief subject to this rule, shall, upon receipt by the Prothonotary, be transmitted to Central Legal Staff.

D. Central Legal Staff, upon receiving an application for relief pursuant to subsection C, shall review the application, prepare a recommendation and present the application and recommendation to the assigned motions judge at a time and place convenient to the motions judge. Central Legal Staff may also present recommendations for sua sponte orders deemed necessary to correct or clarify preliminary procedural matters.

E. The motions judge may decide the application on the basis of the application or may require the filing of an answer or briefs, or the motions judge may schedule a hearing thereon.

F. Unless ordered by the Court, oral argument will not be permitted.

G. It is within the discretion of a single judge to whom an application has been referred to decide the motion or to have it presented to a motions panel. Pa.R.A.P. 123(e).

(As amended, effective 1/1/97)

H. Once a case is scheduled before a panel, all motions filed thereafter shall be referred to that panel.

I. Motions for continuance are to be referred to the presiding judge of the panel who alone may decide the motion, or who may obtain a vote of the other judges of the panel by letter or phone.

J. Any motions for mandamus, prohibition and writs of habeas corpus where no direct appeal is pending shall be referred by the Chief Staff Attorney to the assigned motions judge.

Comment:

See Municipal Publications v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, 507 Pa. 194, 489 A.2d 1286 (1985).

Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Pennsylvania may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.