Pennsylvania Code
Title 204 - JUDICIAL SYSTEM GENERAL PROVISIONS
Part VIII - CRIMINAL SENTENCING
Chapter 303 - SENTENCING GUIDELINES, 7TH EDITION
Section 303.11 - Guideline sentence recommendation: sentencing levels
Current through Register Vol. 54, No. 44, November 2, 2024
(a) Purpose of sentence. In writing the sentencing guidelines, the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing strives to provide a benchmark for the judges of Pennsylvania, a common starting point with a range of recommendations for the typical offender. The sentencing guidelines provide sanctions proportionate to the severity of the crime and the severity of the offender's prior conviction record. This establishes a sentencing system with a primary focus on retribution, but one in which the recommendations allow for the fulfillment of other sentencing purposes including rehabilitation, deterrence, and incapacitation.
The sentencing guidelines provide recommendations regarding the type of disposition, the duration of confinement and/or community supervision, the intensity of conditions, and the requirements associated with restitution and other economic sanctions. While the sentencing guidelines provide a retributive framework for sentencing, other factors may impact the sentencing decision and other information may assist the court in determining an appropriate and individualized sentence. These include:
While courts are required to consider the guidelines at sentencing, Pennsylvania's sentencing guidelines are advisory: "Guidelines serve the laudatory role of aiding and enhancing the judicial exercise of judgement by the Court in imposing a sentence. . .they are advisory guideposts that are valuable, may provide an essential starting point, and that must be respected and considered; they recommend, however, than require a particular sentence." Com. v. Walls (926 A.2d 957) (Pa., 2007).
The imposition of a sentence involves decisions beyond disposition and duration, such as place of confinement, paroling authority and intensity of community supervision. In many cases the court is required to determine the eligibility and appropriateness of individuals for program participation, including as provided in § 303.12: county intermediate punishment programs as restrictive conditions of probation, numerous state correctional programs operated by the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, and reentry programs authorized at the time of sentencing. Additionally, the specialized jurisdiction of problem-solving courts, as authorized by 42 Pa.C.S. § 916, provide an avenue for the use of court-supervised individualized treatment programs and services.
(b) Sentencing levels. The sentencing level is based on the standard range of the sentencing recommendation. Refer to § 303.9 to determine which sentence recommendation (i.e.-Basic, Enhancement) applies. When the individual or aggregate minimum sentence recommendation includes confinement in a county facility, the court should consider the guidelines to determine the appropriateness and eligibility for probation with restrictive conditions as described in § 303.12(a) and county reentry as described in § 303.12(f)(1). When the individual or aggregate minimum sentence recommendation includes confinement in a state facility, the court should consider the guidelines to determine the appropriateness and eligibility for certain correctional programs, including State Motivational Boot Camp, State Drug Treatment Program, Recidivism Risk Reduction Incentive Program and Short Sentence Parole as described in § 303.12(b)-(e). The descriptions of the five sentencing levels are as follows:
This section cited in 204 Pa. Code § 303.2 (relating to procedure for determining the guideline sentence); 294 Pa. Code § 303.12 (relating to guideline sentence recommendations: sentencing and correctional programs); and 204 Pa. Code § 307.4 (relating to guideline resentence recommendations).