Oregon Administrative Rules
Chapter 839 - BUREAU OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES
Division 50 - CONTESTED CASE HEARING RULES
Section 839-050-0210 - Case Summary

Universal Citation: OR Admin Rules 839-050-0210

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 9, September 1, 2024

(1) Prior to any contested case hearing, the Administrative Law Judge may issue a discovery order directing the participants to prepare a case summary due no later than 14 calendar days before the hearing date, containing any or all of the following:

(a) A list of all persons to be called as witnesses, including expert witnesses, at the hearing, except that impeachment or rebuttal witnesses need not be included on the witness list;

(b) The qualifications of any expert witnesses and the substance of the facts and opinions to which the experts are expected to testify;

(c) Identification and description of any document or other physical evidence to be offered into evidence at the hearing, together with two copies of any such document, except that evidence offered solely for impeachment or rebuttal need not be identified or furnished;

(d) Statement of any defenses to the claim;

(e) Statement of any agreed or stipulated facts;

(f) Statement, when appropriate, of any applicable agency policies together with, in the discretion of the Agency, any supporting documents or information on which such policies are based.

(2) When a party is unrepresented by counsel, the Administrative Law Judge may order the party to produce a summary of the case containing only the information and documents described in subsections (1)(a), (b), and (c) of this rule.

(3) Each participant must serve a copy of its case summary, including all documents or other physical evidence to be offered into evidence at the hearing as described in (1)(c) of this rule, on the other participants. Following production of the case summary and before the start of the hearing, a participant must, as soon as practicable, file and serve the other participants with an addendum to its case summary if the participant intends to offer as evidence at the hearing any additional documents, physical exhibits, or testimony that was not identified in the original case summary. The addendum must meet the requirements of paragraphs (1)(a), (1)(b), and (1)(c) of this rule, as applicable. As with the original case summary, evidence to be offered solely for impeachment or rebuttal need not be identified or furnished.

(4) When the Administrative Law Judge orders a case summary, the Administrative Law Judge will notify the participants of the possible sanction, pursuant to OAR 839-050-0210(5), for failure to provide the case summary.

(5) The Administrative Law Judge may refuse to admit evidence that has not been disclosed in response to a case summary order, unless the participant that failed to provide the evidence offers a satisfactory reason for having failed to do so or unless excluding the evidence would violate the duty to conduct a full and fair inquiry under ORS 183.417(8). If the Administrative Law Judge admits evidence not provided in response to a case summary order, the Administrative Law Judge may grant a continuance to allow an opportunity for the other participants to respond.

Statutory/Other Authority: ORS chapter 183 & ORS 651.060(4)

Statutes/Other Implemented: ORS 279C.860, 279C.865, 652.332(3), 653.065(1), 658.115, 658.407(3), 658.820, 659A.845 & 659A.850

Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Oregon may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.