Oregon Administrative Rules
Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Division 13 - USE OF FORCE
Section 291-013-0140 - Reviews
Universal Citation: OR Admin Rules 291-013-0140
Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 9, September 1, 2024
(1) General:
(a) Whenever staff employs force in response
to an incident involving an adult in custody, a preliminary review of the use
of force incident shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures
established in these rules.
(b) A
full review of a use of force incident shall be conducted by independent
departmental review in accordance with the procedures established in these
rules when requested by the Inspector General, or when the following
circumstances exist:
(A) A person received a
serious physical injury in the course of the use of force incident;
or
(B) A firearm was discharged
during the incident, as defined in the firearms section of OAR
291-013-0105.
(c) The
Inspector General may decide if the full review process for the incident
requires assembly of a departmental review team to conduct the full review, or
order a separate investigation be conducted by a special investigator from the
Investigations Unit.
(2) Preliminary Review:
(a) The officer-in-charge
shall conduct a preliminary review of all use of force incidents within 48
hours of the incident.
(b) Staff
involved in the use of force incident shall prepare, assemble and provide to
the officer-in-charge all information and records that are relevant to the
incident, including but not limited to reports, documents, videos, and
photographs of involved persons and witnesses. Staff and/or adults in custody
may be interviewed as necessary to clarify or obtain relevant information. The
officer-in-charge shall review the information and records to ensure the
documentation of the incident is complete.
(c) The officer-in-charge shall review the
documentation for compliance with administrative directives and prepare a
preliminary review report. The officer-in-charge shall forward the preliminary
review report and supporting documentation to the Assistant Superintendent of
Security/security manager, with one of the following recommendations:
(A) In compliance with administrative
directives, requires only a preliminary review; and
(i) No further action is required;
or
(ii) Further
corrective action is required by the functional unit manager or designee to
address perceived training, security, or other operational issues;
(B) In compliance with
administrative directives, but requires a full review; or
(C) Not in compliance with administrative
directives, but requires only a preliminary review because appropriate
corrective action has been taken by the functional unit manager or designee;
or
(D) Not in compliance with
administrative directives and requires a full review.
(d) The Assistant Superintendent of
Security/security manager shall review the preliminary review report and all
supporting documentation and make any necessary modification or additions
he/she deems necessary. The review shall include a preliminary review of the
video footage and all associated reports. The preliminary review report and
supporting documentation shall be forwarded to the functional unit
manager.
(e) The functional unit
manager shall review the preliminary review report and all supporting
documentation and make any necessary modification or additions deemed
necessary. The review shall include a preliminary review of the video footage
and all associated reports. The functional unit manager shall document all
corrective action taken. If the functional unit manager notes signs of
excessive force, they shall notify the appropriate Institutions Administrator
directly and provide necessary documents, so that there is no undue delay in
initiating a full review or separate investigation. The functional unit manager
shall make their recommendation on the preliminary review and forward the
preliminary review and supporting documentation to the Institutions
Administrator.
(f) The Institutions
Administrator shall review the preliminary review report and supporting
documentation. The Institutions Administrator may determine no further review
is required. If the Institutions Administrator determines a full review is
warranted, all relevant information will be forwarded to the Inspector General
or designee for further review.
(g) All preliminary review reports and
supporting documentation will be forwarded the Office of Inspector General for
record retention.
(3) Full Review:
(a) When a full review of a use
of force incident is requested by the Institutions Administrator and approved
by the Inspector General or otherwise required under these rules, a
departmental review team shall be assembled to conduct the full review, or a
separate investigation shall be conducted by a special investigator from the
Investigations Unit.
(b) The
departmental review team shall include, at a minimum, a representative from
Special Investigations assigned by the Inspector General and a representative
from two separate functional units other than the functional unit in which the
incident took place. The functional unit representatives may include a
represented employee. The Special Investigations representative shall chair the
review team and arrange for the appointment of the review team members in
consultation with the functional unit managers.
(c) The departmental review team shall review
the final preliminary review report and all supporting documentation for
compliance with administrative directives.
(d) If any member of the review team deems it
necessary or advisable to have additional staff or adult in custody interviews
conducted, the review team chair shall arrange for an Investigations Unit
employee(s) to conduct the interview(s).
(e) If the review team chair determines that
a crime may have been committed in the course of the use of force incident, the
review team chair shall contact the State Police or local law enforcement
officials before arranging for any additional interview(s), to determine if the
law enforcement officials are conducting a criminal investigation regarding the
incident, and if so, whether the additional interview(s) would interfere with
the investigation.
(f) If advised
that the interview(s) would interfere with a pending criminal investigation,
the interview(s) shall be postponed until the criminal investigation has been
concluded.
(g) Evaluation Report:
(A) After completing the review process, the
review team shall prepare and submit its evaluation report to the Inspector
General within 30 working days following completion of the full
review.
(B) The report shall set
forth the departmental review team's determination whether the actions taken
were in compliance with Department of Corrections administrative
directive(s).
(C) If the review
team finds evidence of noncompliance, it shall specify these findings and the
rationale upon which the findings have been based in its report.
(D) The Inspector General shall review the
report for completeness and forward it to the functional unit manager,
appropriate Institutions Administrator, and Assistant Director of Operations
for review and any necessary action.
Statutory/Other Authority: ORS 179.040, 423.020, 423.030 & 423.075
Statutes/Other Implemented: ORS 179.040, 423.020, 423.030 & 423.075
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Oregon may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.