Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 9, September 1, 2024
(1) When computing a sentence under ORS
137.320, OISC staff will review
the judgment document for information that is necessary to properly compute the
sentence and to determine if it complies with ORS
137.071 and ORS
18.038 by considering whether
the judgment document:
(a) Is identified as a
"judgment;"
(b) Identifies the
court and case number;
(c)
Identifies the defendant;
(d)
Specifies the determination for each charged crime in the information,
indictment, or complaint (for example, whether the charge resulted in
acquittal, dismissal, conviction, or merger with another conviction);
(e) Specifies the crime of conviction and
sentence imposed for each charge that resulted in a conviction;
(f) Includes any information required by
statute or court rules. Examples of this type of information include:
(A) The imposition of any applicable
mandatory minimum sentence;
(B) For
crimes committed on or after December 5, 1996, as required under ORS
137.750, includes a statement
regarding whether the defendant may be considered by the executing or releasing
authority for any form of temporary leave from custody, reduction in sentence,
work release, or program of conditional or supervised release authorized by law
for which the defendant is otherwise eligible at the time of sentencing;
and
(g) Contains the
judge's signature, or the signature of the court administrator is authorized by
law to sign the judgment document, and the date the judgment document is
signed.
(2) Consecutive
sentences: As provided under ORS
137.123, the department will
compute sentences with concurrent terms unless the judgment expressly provides
for consecutive sentences.
(a) When a judgment
provides that a sentence is partly or completely consecutive to another
sentence, the department will presume that the terms "consecutive" or
"consecutively" refer to being in a series with one another (that is,
sequential,) unless the judgment requires or provides a different
meaning.
(b) Unless otherwise
provided or required by law or in the judgment, when computing consecutive
sentences, the department may order the sequence of consecutive sentences in
any manner that best effectuates the court's intent expressed in the
judgment.
(c) As provided in ORS
137.123, a court may impose a
sentence that is consecutive to any other sentence which has been previously
imposed or is simultaneously imposed.
(A)
Unless the judgment or law provides otherwise, when a judgment provides that a
sentence will be served "consecutive to sentences previously imposed" or
"consecutively to sentences previously imposed," or includes similar language
to that effect, the department will compute that sentence as being consecutive
to any sentences imposed by any court on or before the date of sentencing,
including other counts in the same case number.
(B) Unless the judgment or law provides
otherwise, when a judgment provides that a sentence will be served "consecutive
to sentences simultaneously imposed" or "consecutively to sentences
simultaneously imposed," or includes similar language to that effect, the
department will compute that sentence as being consecutive to any other
sentences imposed by any court on the date of sentencing, including other
counts in the same case number.
(C)
Unless the judgment or law provides otherwise, when a judgment provides that a
sentence will be served "consecutive to sentences currently being served" or
"consecutively to sentences currently being served," or includes similar
language to that effect, the department will compute that sentence as being
consecutive to any sentences imposed by any court on or before the date of
sentencing, including other counts in the same case number.
Statutory/Other Authority: ORS
423.020,
423.030,
423.075,
179.040, 137, 144,
161.610 & 421
Statutes/Other Implemented: ORS
423.020,
423.030,
423.075,
179.040, 137, 144,
161.610 &
421