(3) Allocation of personal services.
(a) Where compensation is received for
personal services that are performed partly within and partly without this
state, that part of the income allocable to this state is included in gross
income. In general, income is allocable to this state to the extent the
employee is physically present in this state at the time the service is
performed. Physical presence is determined by the actual physical location of
the employee performing the services and not by the location of the employer or
the location where compensation is paid. Employees who work in Oregon and at an
alternate work site located outside of Oregon may allocate their compensation
under the provisions of this rule.
Example 1
: Dick, a nonresident, works as a medical transcriptionist for an Oregon
employer. During the year, Dick spends about 80 percent of his time working
from his home in Washington. Dick spends the remainder of his work time in the
Portland office. Only the time Dick spends at the Portland office is considered
time worked in Oregon.
(A) The gross income
from commissions earned by a nonresident for services performed or sales made,
(whose compensation is a specified commission on each sale made or services
performed), includes the specific commissions earned on sales made or services
performed in this state. Allowable deductions must be computed on the same
basis.
(B) If nonresident employees
work within and without this state, the portion of total compensation for
personal services allocable to Oregon is the total number of actual working
days employed within the state divided by the total number of working days both
within and without the state.
(C)
If nonresident employees work part of a day in Oregon and part of a day outside
Oregon, the portion of total compensation for personal services allocable to
Oregon is the number of hours worked in Oregon divided by the total number of
hours worked within and without the state.
Example 2: Rod is a nonresident of Oregon. He
works for ACE Cell Tower, Inc and is paid to work 40 hours each week. Some days
he works both in Oregon and Idaho. Rod earned $64,000 in 2012. Rod's employer
requires him to keep a detailed log of his travel. At the end of 2012 he had
worked a total of 1,850 hours and his log and information from his employer
shows that 962 of those hours were worked in Oregon. His compensation taxable
to Oregon is computed as follows:
Hours worked in Oregon -- divided by -- Total hours worked x
Total compensation = Oregon compensation 0.520 (962 hours divided by 1,850
hours) x $64,000 = $33,280 Rod's compensation subject to Oregon tax is
$33,280.
(D) If the employees are paid
on a mileage basis, the gross income from sources within this state includes
that portion of the total compensation for personal services which the number
of miles traveled in Oregon bears to the total number of miles traveled within
and without the state.
(E) If the
employees are paid on some other basis, the total compensation for personal
services must be apportioned between this state and other states and foreign
countries in such a manner as to allocate to Oregon that portion of the total
compensation which is reasonably attributable to personal services performed in
this state.
(b) The gross income of all other nonresident
employees, including corporate officers, includes that portion of the total
compensation for services which the total number of actual working days
employed within this state bears to the total number of actual working days
employed both within and without this state during the taxable period.
Example 3: Jan is a nonresident of Oregon.
She works for A Corp. Jan manages offices in Oregon and Washington. A Corp.
pays her a salary of $30,000 for the management of both offices. She worked in
Oregon 132 days. She would figure her compensation subject to Oregon tax as
follows:
Days worked in Oregon - divided by - Total days worked x Total
compensation = Oregon compensation 0.600 (132 days divided by 220 days) x
$30,000 = $18,000 Jan's compensation subject to Oregon tax is $18,000.
An exception to this general rule is made when the compensation
is received for performance of services that, by their nature, have an
objective or an effect that takes place within this state. In the case of
corporate officers and executives who spend only a portion of their time within
this state, but whose compensation paid by a corporation operating in Oregon is
exclusively for managerial services performed by such officers and executives,
the entire amount of compensation so earned is taxable without apportionment.
Example 4: Cade is a
nonresident of Oregon. He works for Best Engineering. Cade manages Best
Engineering's only office, which is located in Oregon. Best Engineering pays
him a salary exclusively for managerial services in the total amount of
$58,000. Even though Cade may perform some administrative duties from his home,
the compensation he receives is for managing the Oregon office. The entire
$58,000 is taxable to Oregon.
(c) Total compensation for personal services
includes sick leave pay, holiday pay, and vacation pay. Sick leave days,
holidays, and vacation days are not considered actual working days either in or
out of this state and are to be excluded from the calculation of the portion of
total compensation for personal services taxable to this state.
Example 5: Joan is a nonresident of Oregon.
She actually worked a total of 220 days during the year and was paid for 40
non-working days (holidays, sick days and vacation days). She worked 110 days
in Oregon. Her compensation (including compensation for holidays, sick leave
and vacations) was $26,000. She would figure her compensation subject to Oregon
tax as follows:
Days worked in Oregon - divided by - Total days worked x Total
compensation = Oregon compensation
0.500 (110 days divided by 220 days) x $26,000 = $13,000
Joan's compensation subject to Oregon tax is $13,000.
(d) Payment in forms
other than money. Total compensation for personal services includes amounts
paid in a form other than money. To the extent the payments are recognized as
compensation income for federal income tax purposes, the payments will be
recognized as compensation income for Oregon tax purposes and must be
apportioned as provided in section (3) of this rule. Examples include but are
not limited to, non-statutory stock options, taxable fringe benefits such as
personal use of a business asset, and employer-paid membership fees.
(A) Non-statutory stock options with a
readily ascertainable fair market value. Compensation income will be allocated
to Oregon in the year an option is required to be reported on the federal
return if a nonresident taxpayer performed services in connection with the
grant of such option in Oregon during the year in which the option was granted
and:
(i) Is required to report under IRC
section 83(a) as compensation income the value of a non-statutory stock option
granted in connection with the performance of services that has a "readily
ascertainable fair market value," as described in Treasury Regulation
1.83-7(b), as of the date the option was granted; or
(ii) Elects under IRC 83(b) to report the
value of such an option as of the date the option was granted. If a nonresident
taxpayer performed personal services partly within and partly without Oregon in
the year in which the option was granted, the taxpayer must use the allocation
applied to the taxpayer's other compensation under section (3) of this rule for
the tax year in which the option was granted and apply that ratio to the
compensation income required to be reported on the federal return. For example,
if the taxpayer allocates his income under subsection (3)(a) of this rule and
worked 25 percent of his time in Oregon during the year the option was granted,
he must include in Oregon income 25 percent of the compensation income related
to the option included in federal taxable income. Generally, Oregon will not
tax the subsequent gain or loss on the sale of the stock unless the stock has
acquired a business situs in Oregon. See OAR 150-316.127-(D).
(B) Non-statutory stock options
without a readily ascertainable fair market value that are taxable at exercise,
or in a pre-exercise disposition. If a non-statutory stock option granted in
connection with performance of services that does not have a readily
ascertainable fair market value at the date of the grant is recognized as
compensation income for federal tax purposes and the taxpayer worked in Oregon
during the year the option was granted, the taxpayer must allocate the
compensation related to the option to Oregon in the same year it is taxable for
federal purposes. The income that is recognized for federal purposes must be
allocated to Oregon if the taxpayer worked in Oregon during the tax year the
option was granted. Compute the amount of compensation includable in Oregon
source income using the following formula:
Total days worked in Oregon from date of grant to date of
federal recognition - divided by - Total days worked everywhere from date of
grant to date of federal recognition x Compensation related to option exercise
= Amount taxable by Oregon
Any further appreciation or depreciation in the value of the
stock after the date of exercise represents investment income or loss and is
not includable in the Oregon source income of a nonresident unless the stock
acquired a business situs in Oregon (see OAR 150-316.127(D)).
(C) Treatment of taxable fringe benefits.
Income recognized for federal purposes must be allocated to Oregon if the
nonresident worked in Oregon during the tax year the benefit was received. The
nonresident must use the same allocation rules applicable to the taxpayer's
other compensation under section (3) of this rule to the taxable fringe
benefits. For example, if the taxpayer allocates his income under subsection
(3)(a) of this rule and worked 55 percent of his time in Oregon, 55 percent of
the amount of the taxable fringe benefit that is included in federal taxable
income is included in Oregon taxable income.
(e) Unemployment compensation. Total
compensation includes unemployment compensation benefits to the extent the
benefits pertain to the individual's employment in Oregon. If unemployment
compensation benefits are received by a nonresident for employment in Oregon
and in one or more other states, the unemployment compensation benefits must be
apportioned to Oregon using any method that reasonably reflects the services
performed in Oregon.
Example 6: Gary, a
nonresident, worked in Oregon and Washington for the last 5 years. On January
1, 2014, he was laid off by his employer and received unemployment compensation
of $2,000. Gary may use the Oregon wages as a percentage of total wages
reported on his nonresident tax return for the prior year (2013) to determine
the percentage of unemployment benefits to be included in Oregon income for
2014. In 2013, Gary earned a total of $40,000 of which $26,000 was earned in
Oregon. The unemployment compensation taxable to Oregon is $1,300, computed as
follows:
Oregon prior year wages - divided by - Total prior year wages x
Total current year unemployment compensation = Oregon unemployment compensation
0.650 ($26,000 divided by $40,000) x $2,000 = $1,300. Oregon will tax $1,300 of
Gary's unemployment compensation even though he received it in a tax year when
he did not work in Oregon because the unemployment compensation is based on
Oregon employment. He may not allocate the unemployment based on time worked in
Oregon in 2014 because it does not reasonably reflect services performed in
Oregon.
(f)
Severance pay. Compensation includes severance pay to the extent the pay is
attributable to services performed in Oregon. For purposes of this rule,
"severance pay" means compensation payable on voluntary termination or
involuntary termination of employment based on length of service, a percentage
of final salary, a contract between the employer and the employee, a lump sum
payment based on accumulated paid leave, or some other method but does not
include "retirement income" as defined in ORS
316.127(9). If
severance pay is received for employment within and without Oregon, the
severance pay is allocated to Oregon using any method that reasonably reflects
the services performed in Oregon. For lump sum payments based on accumulated
leave, leave allocated to Oregon will be calculated using a first-in-first-out
(FIFO) method, unless documentation establishes that another method of
allocation more reasonably reflects the services performed in Oregon. Severance
pay and other similar distributions are taxable to Oregon even though a
taxpayer received it in a tax year when the taxpayer did not work in Oregon if
the severance pay is based on Oregon employment.
Example
7: JT, a nonresident, worked for Plumbing Inc. for twenty years:
eight years in Idaho and twelve years in Oregon. At the end of his 20th year,
Plumbing Inc. reorganized and eliminated JT's position. Because of JT's loyalty
to the company for his twenty years of service, the company gave JT a lump-sum
payment of $36,000. This lump-sum was based on 3 percent of his final annual
salary ($60,000 x 3% = $1,800) multiplied by his number of years of service
(20). The lump-sum payment was made because of prior services, thus it is
allocable to Oregon to the extent the services were performed in Oregon. JT
will include $36,000 in federal taxable income and $21,600 in Oregon taxable
income, computed as follows:
Years worked in Oregon for company - divided by - Total years
worked for company x Total compensation = Oregon compensation 0.600 (12 years
divided by 20 years) x $36,000 = $21,600
Example 8: Shawn, a nonresident, worked in
Oregon for XYZ Foods, Inc. for six years before resigning from the company. XYZ
Foods, Inc. and Shawn entered into a termination agreement that provided
$25,000 for Shawn to release a specific claim he may have against the company
for wrongful termination or other potential claims. The termination agreement
also provided $10,000 to require that Shawn not work for any other food chain
within a 100 mile radius of XYZ Foods, Inc. for a period of 36 months. No
employment agreement, benefit plan, or any facts or circumstances indicate that
Shawn is entitled to a payment for services he performed prior to resigning
from the company. The payment that Shawn receives pursuant to the termination
agreement is in exchange for the release of the wrongful termination claim and
the covenant not to compete and is not allocable to Oregon because it is not
based on services performed in Oregon.
Example
9: Assume the same facts in Example 8 except that the termination
agreement also provided for a lump-sum payment of one month's salary per year
worked ($30,000) in addition to a $25,000 payment for release of a wrongful
termination claim and $10,000 payment for the covenant not to compete. No
employment agreement, benefit plan, or other agreement indicates that Shawn is
entitled to a payment for services he performed prior to resigning from the
company. The $25,000 payment for the release of the wrongful termination claim
and the $10,000 payment for the covenant not to compete are not allocable to
Oregon because neither is based on services performed in Oregon. The $30,000
lump-sum cash payment based on Shawn's salary and years of service associates
the payment with the employer-employee relationship. It is 100 percent
allocable to Oregon because Shawn worked in Oregon and the facts and
circumstances indicate that it is paid because of prior performance of services
and no other reason.
Example 10:
Natalie, a nonresident, worked for Chocolate Inc. for 14 years: 12 years and 8
months in Idaho and in Oregon for the last 16 months of her employment with the
company. Upon her resignation, her hourly wage was $20 and she had 400 hours of
paid vacation leave available. Natalie received 8 hours of paid vacation leave
per month, her 400 hours of leave represents 50 months of work (400/8=50).
Chocolate Inc paid a lump sum payment for her accumulated and accrued vacation
leave balance of 400 hours- totaling $8,000. Using the first-in-first-out
method of allocation, the 400 hours in her leave balance when she terminated
will be treated as having been earned in her most recent 50 months of
employment; 34 months in Idaho (68%) and 16 months in Oregon (32%). Natalie
will include in the Oregon column of her Oregon nonresident return all of her
wages from Chocolate Inc for the year and $2,560 ($8,000 x 32%) of the lump sum
payment.