Oregon Administrative Rules
Chapter 141 - DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS
Division 90 - ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT REQUIREMENTS AND FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF REGULATING FILL AND REMOVAL WITHIN WATERS OF THIS STATE
Section 141-090-0040 - Procedures for Review and Approval of a Wetland Delineation Report Submitted to the Department for a Jurisdictional Determination
Universal Citation: OR Admin Rules 141-090-0040
Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 9, September 1, 2024
(1) When a wetland delineation report is submitted to the Department for review, approval and a JD, the Department shall review the report (according to its established priorities) to ensure that:
(a) The work meets the technical requirements
in OAR 141-090-0030;
(b) The report
meets the standards and requirements in OAR 141-090-0035;
(c) There is sufficient information for the
Department to make a JD, including the geographic extent and characteristics of
any waters identified, as appropriate; and
(d) There is sufficient information for the
Department to determine the removal-fill authorization requirements or
exemptions that apply to the wetlands or other waters identified and/or the
activities proposed.
(2) The Department shall complete an initial review of the report within 120 calendar days from receipt of the report and the fee.
(3) During or upon completion of the Department's review, the Department may take the following actions:
(a) Approve all or a portion of the report
and PJD by providing a written JD to the landowner, agent, or applicant and the
consultant, if any, in accordance with OAR 141-090-0025(10).
(b) Request missing information (report
incomplete), clarification, or additional data (see OAR 141-090-0035(9), (10),
and (12)(h)).
(A) The request will be made to
the primary contact orally by telephone or in writing by e-mail or regular U.S.
Mail.
(B) If the Department makes a
written request to the primary contact, the Department will copy the request to
the consultant, landowner, agent, and applicant, as appropriate.
(C) The primary contact shall be responsible
for promptly informing the Department of any change in the primary contact
during the Department's review process.
(c) Conduct a site visit to verify the report
findings or obtain additional information;
(d) Withdraw the report from further review
if missing payment, if the landowner, agent, or applicant requests withdrawal
or if otherwise determined by the Department;
(e) Require revisions of the delineation
map(s) and the PJD based upon the report review, any additional information
requested, and a site visit (if conducted) and provide a JD accordingly after
consulting with the primary contact and report author, if different;
or
(f) Reject the report with a
written explanation to the applicant, consultant, landowner, and agent, as
appropriate. Examples of reasons for rejecting a report include, but are not
limited to:
(A) The work has not been
completed according to the technical requirements in OAR
141-090-0030.
(B) The report does
not, in the judgment of the Department, accurately reflect site conditions or
provide sufficient information for a JD.
(C) The report contains major errors,
omissions, or inconsistencies according to the standards and requirements in
OAR 141-090-0035, such as but not limited to:
(i) On-site data are not collected (e.g., an
off-site or reconnaissance level report);
(ii) No paired plots, or number of paired
plots is clearly inadequate for length and complexity of wetland
boundaries;
(iii) Data forms with
major gaps (e.g., no soils data collected);
(iv) Wrong data form used;
(v) Clearly erroneous data or
conclusions;
(vi) All water
features are not mapped;
(vii)
Permission for a requested site visit is not granted;
(viii) Standard report format is not followed
(OAR 141-090-0035(1));
(ix) Report
cannot be field verified because site preparation or construction has already
commenced;
(x) The Department
requests and conducts a site visit and the wetland boundaries and sample plots
are not identified on the ground or cannot be accurately located by the
consultant or applicant (see OAR 141-090-0035(8));
(xi) After the second written request for
information or revisions, the resubmitted information does not address all of
the Department's comments or requests or introduces new errors; or
(xii) Additional clarifying information,
requested revisions, or communication requesting additional time are not
provided within 60 calendar days of the Department's written request.
Statutory/Other Authority: ORS 196.845 & 196.692
Statutes/Other Implemented: ORS 196.800 - 196.990, 196.600 - 196.665, 196.668 - 196.692 & 197.279
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Oregon may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.