Oklahoma Administrative Code
Title 340 - Department of Human Services
Chapter 25 - Child Support Services
Subchapter 5 - Operational Policies
Part 33 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL CASES
Section 340:25-5-270 - Intergovernmental cases

Universal Citation: OK Admin Code 340:25-5-270

Current through Vol. 42, No. 1, September 16, 2024

(a) Legal basis. When referring and processing intergovernmental Title IV-D cases, the Oklahoma Human Services Child Support Services (CSS) is governed by:

(1) Section 1738B of Title 28 of the United States Code (28 U.S.C. § 1738B) and 42 U.S.C. §§ 654, 659A, and 666;

(2) Sections 302.36 and 303.7 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations (45 C.F.R. §§ 302.36 and 303.7); and

(3) the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, per Sections 601-100 through 601-903 of Title 43 of the Oklahoma Statutes (43 O.S. §§ 601-100 through 601-903) and 56 O.S. § 240.9.

(b) Definition. For purposes of this Section, forum state means the state where the hearing is held or where the responding court proceeding is filed to establish or enforce a support order.

(c) Intergovernmental central registry. CSS operates an intergovernmental central registry, per 45 C.F.R. §§ 302.36 and 303.7.

(d) Forms. CSS uses forms issued by the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, per 42 U.S.C. § 652 as applicable for processing intergovernmental cases.

(e) Communication. When:

(1) Oklahoma is the initiating state, CSS obtains information from the other Title IV-D agency and communicates with the custodial person (CP) in Oklahoma.

(2) Oklahoma is the responding state, CSS communicates to the initiating state with which CSS has established a case.

(3) CSS receives written communication from a party or a party's attorney, CSS sends copies to the appropriate agency or person within two-business days of receipt, per 43 O.S. § 601-307.

(f) Family violence and nondisclosure. When Oklahoma is the initiating state and a party claims family violence, CSS does not release the party's physical address without a court order. CSS:

(1) enters the address of record, when designated, or the district office's address instead of the physical address of the party requesting nondisclosure on the Child Support Enforcement Transmittal # 1, Initial Request, Nondisclosure Finding Affidavit, and on the General Testimony, when applicable;

(2) does not file the interstate transmittal forms with the tribunal;

(3) does not release a copy of the interstate transmittal form to the other party, per Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) 340:25-5-67; and

(4) seeks an order from the appropriate tribunal regarding release of the information when the initiating state, responding state, or a party requests release of specific identifying information, per 43 O.S. § 601-312.

(g) Services provided. Except as provided in (1) through (4) of this subsection, CSS processes intergovernmental cases in the same manner as intrastate cases, per OAC 340:25-1-1.2.

(1) Evidence. If one of the parties is a nonresident of the forum state, CSS arranges for testimony over the phone at the request of the nonresident party or a Title IV-D agency, and requests the court to admit evidence, per 43 O.S. § 601-316.

(2) One-state processing. In the absence of an order to establish paternity or support, CSS uses a one-state process to establish an order if personal and subject matter jurisdiction may be exercised over a nonresident party, per 45 C.F.R. § 303.7 and 43 O.S. § 601-201.

(3) Determination of controlling order. When there are multiple orders for current support for the same child, CSS seeks a determination of controlling order (DCO) or a new order from the appropriate tribunal, per 43 O.S. § 601-207 and 43 O.S. §§ 601-602 through 601-615.
(A) When making the arrears calculation for the DCO proceeding, CSS applies the law of the respective issuing states in determining the arrears under each order.

(B) Once the court issues a DCO, CSS applies the law of the controlling order state to the consolidated arrears, even when the support orders of other states contributed a portion to those arrears.

(4) Redirection of payments. Per 43 O.S. §§ 601-307 and 601-319:
(A) CSS issues a notice to redirect payments to the Title IV-D agency in the state where the CP resides and issues an Order/Notice to Withhold Income for Child Support to implement the order when:
(i) Oklahoma is the state that issued the child support or income assignment order;

(ii) neither the noncustodial parent (NCP), CP, or any child lives in Oklahoma; and

(iii) CSS or another Title IV-D agency makes the request.

(B) CSS issues a notice to redirect payments to the Title IV-D agency in the state of residence of the CP when:
(i) a child support or income assignment order was issued;

(ii) neither the NCP, CP, or any child lives in the issuing state; and

(iii) Oklahoma provides child support services.

(C) CSS furnishes a certified record of payments to a requesting party or tribunal when CSS receives redirected payments, per 43 O.S. § 601-319.

(5) Limited services. CSS provides limited services only at the request of an initiating interstate Title IV-D agency or an international central authority, per 43 O.S. §§ 601-101 through 901 and 45 C.F.R. § 303.7. CSS provides limited services, when appropriate, even when an individual NCP or CP does not reside in Oklahoma. The CSS director or appointed designee approves requests for limited services not listed in 45 C.F.R. § 303.7.

(h) Determination of arrears. When Oklahoma has personal and subject matter jurisdiction and can obtain service of process on the NCP, CSS uses the annual notice, notice of support debt, contempt, or other appropriate proceedings to determine past support and interest before requesting a tribunal of another state to enforce.

(i) Choice of law. The applicable law for support duration determination and other choice of law issues is controlled by subsection (h) of the Full Faith and Credit for Child Support Orders Act, per 28 U.S.C. § 1738B(h) and 43 O.S. §§ 601-604 through 601-611. The law of the initial controlling order state governs the support duration even after another state modifies the order.

(j) Genetic testing. When genetic testing is required in intergovernmental cases, the responding state is responsible for paying the cost of testing, per 45 C.F.R. § 303.7 and OAC 340:25-5-176.

Added at 9 Ok Reg 3275, eff 6-26-92 (emergency); Added at 10 Ok Reg 1813, eff 5-13-93; Amended at 12 Ok Reg 1121, eff 3-20-95 (emergency); Amended at 13 Ok Reg 2173, eff 6-14-96; Amended at 17 Ok Reg 2426, eff 7-1-00; Amended at 19 Ok Reg 1746, eff 7-1-02; Amended at 22 Ok Reg 1221, eff 7-1-05; Amended at 23 Ok Reg 1842, eff 7-1-06; Amended at 25 Ok Reg 1307, eff 7-1-08; Amended at 28 Ok Reg 812, eff 7-1-11; Amended at 29 Ok Reg 765, eff 7-1-12

Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Oklahoma may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.