Current through all regulations passed and filed through December 16, 2024
(A) Sex as a bona fide occupational
qualification. The BFOQ exception as to sex shall be narrowly construed so as
to prohibit employment practices which tend to deny employment opportunities
unnecessarily to one sex or the other. Requests for a BFOQ must be submitted
pursuant to rule
4112-3-15 of the Administrative
Code.
(B) Application of the BFOQ
exception. The following situations do not warrant application of the BFOQ
exception.
(1) Refusal to hire, promote,
recall or deny an individual any term, condition or privilege of employment
based upon stereotyped characterizations of the sexes. Individuals shall be
considered on the basis of individual capacities rather than on the basis of
characteristics generally attributed to that group.
(2) Refusal to hire, promote or recall or
deny an individual any term, condition or privilege of employment when such
refusal or denial is based on assumptions of the general comparative employment
characteristics of that sex.
(3)
Refusal to hire based upon state employment laws or administrative regulations
which restrict or limit employment of one sex and do not take into account the
capacities, preferences and abilities of the individual and therefore
discriminate on the basis of sex. Such laws and regulations conflict with and
are superseded by Chapter 4112. of the Revised Code.
(C) Job opportunities advertising. Help
wanted advertising which indicates a preference, limitation or specification
based on sex shall constitute unlawful sex discrimination unless sex is a BFOQ
for a particular job.
(D)
Pre-employment inquiries. Any pre-employment inquiries by an employer, in
connection with the prospective employment of an individual that express,
directly or indirectly, any limitation, specification or preference as to sex
shall be unlawful unless based on a BFOQ.
(E) Fringe benefits. It shall be an unlawful
employment practice for an employer to discriminate on the basis of sex with
regard to fringe benefits.
(1) Benefits
available to employees and their spouses and families which are conditioned on
whether the employee is the head of the household or principal wage earner are
a prima facie violation of the prohibitions against sex discrimination
contained in Chapter 4112. of the Revised Code.
(2) An employer's declaration that the cost
of a benefit program is greater with respect to one sex than the other shall
not be a valid defense to a charge of unlawful sex discrimination.
(3) It shall be an unlawful employment
practice for an employer to maintain a pension or retirement plan which
establishes different optional or compulsory retirement ages based on sex or
which differentiates benefits available on the basis of sex.
(F) Marital status. An employment
rule or regulation which restricts the employment of married members of one sex
and which is not applicable to married members of the other sex shall
constitute unlawful sex discrimination, unless such rule or regulation is based
on a BFOQ.
(G) Pregnancy and
childbirth.
(1) A written or unwritten
employment policy or practice which excludes from employment applicants or
employees because of pregnancy is a prima facie violation of the prohibitions
against sex discrimination contained in Chapter 4112. of the Revised
Code.
(2) Where termination of
employment of an employee who is temporarily disabled due to pregnancy or a
related medical condition is caused by an employment policy under which
insufficient or no maternity leave is available, such termination shall
constitute unlawful sex discrimination.
(3) Written and unwritten employment policies
involving commencement and duration of maternity leave shall be so construed as
to provide for individual capacities and the medical status of the woman
involved.
(4) Employment policies
involving accrual of seniority and all other benefits and privileges of
employment, including company-sponsored sickness and accident insurance plans,
shall be applied to disability due to pregnancy and childbirth on the same
terms and conditions as they are applied to other temporary leaves of absence
of the same classification under such employment policies.
(5) Women shall not be penalized in their
conditions of employment because they require time away from work on account of
childbearing. When, under the employer's leave policy the female employee would
qualify for leave, then childbearing must be considered by the employer to be a
justification for leave of absence for female employees for a reasonable period
of time. For example, if the female meets the equally applied minimum length of
service requirements for leave time, she must be granted a reasonable leave on
account of childbearing. Conditions applicable to her leave (other than its
length) and to her return to employment shall be in accordance with the
employer's leave policy.
(6)
Notwithstanding paragraphs (G)(1) to (G)(5) of this rule, if the employer has
no leave policy, childbearing must be considered by the employer to be a
justification for leave of absence for a female employee for a reasonable
period of time. Following childbirth, and upon signifying her intent to return
within a reasonable time, such female employee shall be reinstated to her
original position or to a position of like status and pay, without loss of
service credits.
(H)
Separate lines of progression and seniority systems. It is an unlawful
employment practice to maintain separate lines of progression or separate
seniority lists based on sex where such practice would adversely affect any
employee unless sex is a BFOQ for that job. Accordingly, employment practices
are unlawful which arbitrarily classify jobs so that:
(1) Females are prohibited from applying for
jobs labeled in a male line of progression and vice versa.
(2) A female scheduled for layoff is
prohibited from displacing a less senior male and vice versa.
(3) The seniority system or line of
progression classifies similar jobs as light or heavy or in some other manner
and thereby operates to create unreasonable obstacles to the advancement of
either sex into jobs which members of that sex would reasonably be expected to
perform.
(I) Employment
agencies.
(1) It shall constitute unlawful sex
discrimination for an employment agency to deal exclusively with one sex,
except to the extent that such agency limits its services to furnishing
employees for particular jobs for which sex is a BFOQ.
(2) An employment agency that receives a job
order containing an unlawful sex specification will share responsibility with
the employer placing the job order if the agency fills the order knowing that
the sex specification is not based on a BFOQ.
(3) An employment agency that receives a job
order containing an unlawful sex specification will not share responsibility
with the employer placing the order if the agency does not have reason to
believe that the employer's claim of a BFOQ is without substance and the agency
makes and maintains a written record available to the commission of each such
job order. Such record shall include the name of the employer, the description
of the job and the basis for the employer's claim that sex is a BFOQ.
(J) Sexual harassment.
(1) Harassment on the basis of sex is a
violation of division (A) of section
4112.02 of the Revised Code.
Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors and other verbal or
physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when:
(a) Submission to such conduct is made either
explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's
employment;
(b) Submission to or
rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment
decisions affecting such individual; or
(c) Such conduct has the purpose or effect of
unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an
intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment.
(2) In determining whether alleged conduct
constitutes sexual harassment, the commission will look at the record as a
whole and the totality of the circumstances, such as the nature of the sexual
advances and the context in which the alleged incidents occurred. The
determination of the legality of a particular action will be made from the
facts on a case-by-case basis.
(3)
An employer may raise an affirmative defense pursuant
to division (B) of section
4112.054 of the Revised
Code. Applying general agency principles, an employer, employment agency,
joint apprenticeship committee or labor organization (hereinafter collectively
referred to as "employer") is responsible for its acts and those of its agents
and supervisory employees with respect to sexual harassment regardless of
whether the specific acts complained of were authorized or even forbidden by
the employer and regardless of whether the employer knew or should have known
of their occurrence. The commission will examine the circumstances of the
particular employment relationship and the job functions performed by the
individual in determining whether an individual acts in either a supervisory or
agency capacity.
(4) With respect
to conduct between fellow employees, an employer is responsible for acts of
sexual harassment in the work place where the employer (or its agents or
supervisory employees) knows or should have known of the conduct, unless the
employer can show that it took immediate and appropriate corrective action.
Factors such as whether the employer had an effective
harassment policy; the employer properly educated employees about the policy
and complaint procedures; the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent or
promptly correct the behavior; and whether the employee failed to take
advantage of any preventative or corrective opportunities will be
considered.
(5) An employer
may also be responsible for the acts of nonemployees (e.g., customers) with
respect to sexual harassment of employees in the work place, where the employer
(or its agents or supervisory employees) knows or should have known of the
conduct and fails to take immediate and appropriate corrective action. In
reviewing these cases the commission will consider the extent of the employer's
control and any other legal responsibility which the employer may have with
respect to the conduct of such nonemployees.
(6) Prevention is the best tool for the
elimination of sexual harassment. An employer should take all steps necessary
to prevent sexual harassment from occurring, such as affirmatively raising the
subject, expressing strong disapproval, developing appropriate sanctions,
informing employees of their right to raise and how to raise the issue of
harassment under Chapter 4112. of the Revised Code and developing methods to
sensitize all concerned.
(7) Other
related practices. Where employment opportunities or benefits are granted
because of an individual's submission to the employer's requests for sexual
favors, the employer may be held liable for unlawful sex discrimination against
other persons who were qualified for but denied that employment opportunity or
benefit.