Current through all regulations passed and filed through September 16, 2024
This rule identifies the engineered
components of a scrap tire monofill facility, design specifications, and
construction and reporting requirements.
(A)
The owner or
operator shall contact the approved board of health and Ohio EPA prior to
commencing construction of each phase of the scrap tire monofill facility for
the purpose of inspection.
(B)
The owner or
operator shall design and construct the scrap tire monofill facility as
follows:
(1)
The
foundation or added geologic material used to meet the isolation distance
between the uppermost aquifer system and the bottom of the liner system
complies with the following:
(a)
Is free of debris, foreign material, deleterious
material, and shall not contain large objects in such quantities as may
interfere with its application and intended purpose.
(b)
Is not comprised
of solid waste.
(c)
Is determined to have adequate strength to satisfy
bearing capacity and slope stability strength requirements.
(d)
Is resistant to
internal erosion.
(e)
For foundation, has quality control testing for
resistance to internal erosion of any stratigraphic units that have not been
anticipated and that are more susceptible to seepage piping failure than the
stratigraphic units that were tested and reported in the permit to install in
accordance with ASTM D4647.
(f)
For added
geologic material, is constructed in lifts to achieve uniform compaction that
comply with the following:
(i)
Be constructed in loose lifts of twelve inches or
less.
(ii)
Be constructed of a soil with a maximum clod size that
does not exceed the lift thickness.
(iii)
Be compacted to
at least ninety-five per cent of the maximum dry density determined in
accordance with ASTM D698 or at least ninety per cent of the maximum dry
density determined in accordance with ASTM D1557.
(iv)
Be placed with a
soil moisture content that is not less than two per cent below or more than
four per cent above the optimum moisture content determined in accordance with
ASTM D698 or ASTM D1557.
(v)
Have a maximum permeability of 1 x
10-5 cm/sec determined in accordance with ASTM D5084
or other method acceptable to Ohio EPA at a frequency of no less than one test
per acre per lift. The locations of the individual tests shall be adequately
spaced to represent the constructed area and any penetrations repaired. This
paragraph does not apply if the soil is classified as a "CL" in accordance with
ASTM D2487.
(vi)
Be classified as slightly dispersive (ND3) or
nondispersive (ND2, ND1) determined in accordance with ASTM
D4647.
(g)
For added geologic material, have quality control
testing of the constructed lifts performed to determine the density and
moisture content in accordance with ASTM D6938, ASTM D1556, ASTM D2167 or other
methods acceptable to Ohio EPA at a frequency of no less than five tests per
acre per lift. The locations of the individual tests shall be adequately spaced
to represent the constructed area and any penetrations repaired using
bentonite.
(2)
Structural fill, including rock fill or soil fill, used
as a structural berm or subbase complies with the following:
(a)
For rock fill, be
durable rock.
(b)
Be free of debris, foreign material, and deleterious
material.
(c)
Not be comprised of solid waste.
(d)
Not have any
abrupt changes in grade that may result in damage to the liner
system.
(e)
For soil fill, have pre-construction testing of the
borrow soils performed on representative samples to determine the maximum dry
density and optimum moisture content in accordance with ASTM D698 or ASTM D1557
at a frequency of no less than once for every ten thousand cubic
yards.
(f)
Be constructed in lifts to achieve uniform compaction
of soil fills that comply with the following:
(i)
Be constructed in
loose lifts of twelve inches or less.
(ii)
Be compacted to
at least ninety-five per cent of the maximum dry density determined in
accordance with ASTM D698 or at least ninety per cent of the maximum dry
density determined in accordance with ASTM D1557.
(g)
Be determined to
have adequate strength to satisfy bearing capacity and slope stability strength
requirements.
(h)
Have quality control testing of the soil fills on the
constructed lifts performed to determine the density and moisture content in
accordance with ASTM D6938, ASTM D1556, ASTM D2167 or other methods acceptable
to Ohio EPA at a frequency of no less than five tests per acre per lift with
locations of the individual tests adequately spaced to represent the
constructed area.
(3)
The liner system
is designed as follows:
(a)
For new facilities or lateral expansions of existing
facilities, with at least a 2.0 per cent slope in all areas except along flow
lines augmented by leachate collection pipes, after accounting for one hundred
per cent of the primary consolidation settlement and the secondary
consolidation settlement of the compressible materials beneath the facility.
Compressible materials include, as applicable, in-situ soil, added geologic
material, structural fill material, and recompacted soil liner. For the
purposes of this paragraph, secondary settlement is calculated using a one
hundred year time frame or another time frame acceptable to Ohio
EPA.
(b)
For existing facilities where an owner or operator
proposes to vertically expand over a liner system that was constructed after
December 31, 2003, the slope of the existing liner system located beneath the
vertical expansion meets the design standard in paragraph (B)(3)(a) of this
rule.
(c)
For existing facilities where an owner or operator
proposes to vertically expand over a liner system that was constructed before
December 31, 2003, a demonstration that the existing liner system located
beneath the vertical expansion at a minimum maintains positive drainage in the
leachate collection system and has no more than one foot of head of leachate
after accounting for the additional waste and one hundred percent of the
primary consolidation settlement and the secondary consolidation settlement of
the compressible materials beneath the facility. Compressible materials
include, as applicable, in-situ soil, added geologic material, structural fill
material, and recompacted soil liner. For the purposes of this paragraph,
secondary settlement is calculated using a one hundred year time frame or
another time frame acceptable to Ohio EPA.
(4)
With a
recompacted soil liner that at a minimum complies with the following:
(a)
Be constructed
using loose lifts eight inches thick or less to achieve uniform compaction,
with each lift having a maximum permeability of 1 x 10-6
cm/sec.
(b)
Be constructed of a soil with a maximum clod size of
three inches or half the lift thickness, whichever is less.
(c)
Be constructed of
a soil that meets the following:
(i)
With one hundred per cent of the particles having a
maximum dimension not greater than two inches.
(ii)
With not more
than ten per cent of the particles by weight having a dimension greater than
0.75 inches.
(iii)
With a classification of slightly dispersive (ND3) or
nondispersive (ND2, ND1) as determined in accordance with ASTM
D4647.
(iv)
With either of the following:
(a)
Not less than
twenty-five per cent of the particles, by weight, having a maximum dimension
not greater than 0.002 millimeters.
(b)
A recompacted
laboratory permeability of 1 x 10-7 cm/sec in
accordance with ASTM D5084 at a frequency of no less than once for every ten
thousand cubic yards.
(d)
Be compacted to at least ninety-five per cent of the
maximum "standard proctor density" in accordance with ASTM D698 or at least
ninety per cent of the maximum "modified proctor density" in accordance with
ASTM D1557.
(e)
Be compacted at a moisture content at or wet of
optimum.
(f)
Alternatives for paragraphs (B)(4)(a) to (B)(4)(e) of
this rule may be used if it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of Ohio EPA
that the materials and techniques will result in each lift having a maximum
permeability of 1 x 10-6 cm/sec.
(g)
Not be comprised
of solid waste.
(h)
Be constructed using the number of passes and lift
thickness, and the same or similar type and weight of compaction equipment
established by testing specified in paragraphs (B)(4)(m) and (B)(4)(n) of this
rule.
(i)
Be placed on the bottom and exterior excavated sides of
the monofill and have a minimum bottom slope of two per cent and a maximum
slope based on the following:
(i)
Compaction equipment limitations.
(ii)
Slope
stability.
(iii)
Maximum friction angle between any soil-geosynthetic
interface and between any geosynthetic-geosynthetic interface.
(iv)
Resistance of
geosynthetic and geosynthetic seams to tensile forces.
(j)
Be
constructed on a prepared surface that complies with the following:
(i)
Be free of
debris, foreign material, and deleterious material.
(ii)
Be capable of
bearing the weight of the facility and its construction and operations without
causing or allowing a failure of the liner to occur through
settling.
(iii)
Not have any abrupt changes in grade that may result in
damage to geosynthetics.
(k)
Be at least one
of the following:
(i)
Three feet thick, unless the director approves an
alternate thickness, to be no less than one and one-half feet
thick.
(ii)
One and one-half feet thick with a geosynthetic clay
liner that meets the specifications in paragraph (B)(5) of this
rule.
(iii)
Based on a design acceptable to the director that is no
less protective of human health and the environment than the designs specified
in paragraphs (B)(4)(k)(i) and (B)(4)(k)(ii) of this rule. Except for a
submergence facility, a flexible membrane liner shall not be used due to the
heat or contact with burning pyrolitic oils from a fire.
(l)
Be
adequately protected from damage due to desiccation, freeze/thaw cycles,
wet/dry cycles, and the intrusion of objects during construction and
operation.
(m)
Is modeled by the construction of a test pad that
complies with the following unless an alternative capable of ensuring the
recompacted soil liner meets the requirements of this paragraph is demonstrated
to the satisfaction of Ohio EPA:
(i)
Be designed such that the proposed tests are
appropriate and their results are valid.
(ii)
Be constructed
to establish the construction details that are necessary to obtain sufficient
compaction to satisfy the permeability requirement. The construction details
include such items as the lift thickness, the water content necessary to
achieve the desired compaction, and the type, weight, and number of passes of
construction equipment.
(iii)
Be constructed prior to the construction of the
recompacted soil liner which the test pad will model.
(iv)
Be constructed
whenever there is a significant change in soil material
properties.
(v)
Have a minimum width three times the width of
compaction equipment, and a minimum length two times the length of compaction
equipment, including power equipment and any attachments.
(vi)
Be comprised of
at least four lifts.
(vii)
Be tested for field permeability, following the
completion of test pad construction, using methods acceptable to Ohio EPA. For
each lift, a minimum of three tests for moisture content and density shall be
performed.
(viii)
Be reconstructed as many times as necessary to meet the
permeability requirement. Any amended construction details shall be noted for
future soil liner construction.
(n)
For the
recompacted soil liner test pad, is described in a certification report that is
signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the state of Ohio
and contains a narrative that proposes the construction details, the range of
soil properties that will be used to construct the recompacted soil liner, and
the results of all the testing specified in this paragraph. The report shall be
submitted to the appropriate Ohio EPA district office for written concurrence
not later than fourteen days prior to the intended construction of the
recompacted soil liner that will be modeled by the test pad.
(o)
Moisture content
and density testing of the recompacted soil liner performed in accordance with
ASTM D6938, ASTM D1556, ASTM D2167, or other methods acceptable to Ohio EPA at
a frequency of no less than five tests per acre per lift with any penetrations
repaired using bentonite or using methods acceptable to Ohio
EPA.
(5)
Geosynthetic clay
liner that complies with the following:
(a)
Be negligibly
permeable to fluid migration.
(b)
Be installed to
allow no more than negligible amounts of leakage by a minimum overlap of six
inches, or, for end-of-panel seams, a minimum overlap of twelve inches. Overlap
shall be increased in accordance with manufacturer's specifications or to
account for shrinkage due to weather conditions.
(c)
Have a dry
bentonite mass per unit area of at least 0.75 pounds per square foot at zero
percent moisture content.
(d)
Be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's
specifications in regard to handling, overlap, and the use of granular or
powdered bentonite to enhance bonding at the seams.
(6)
The leachate
management system that complies with the following:
(a)
Be designed to
avoid clogging and crushing.
(b)
Include a
drainage layer placed on top of the liner that is able to rapidly collect
leachate entering the system. A geocomposite may be used if it is demonstrated
to Ohio EPA that the material meets the requirements of this paragraph.
Granular material shall comply with the following:
(i)
Have a minimum
permeability of 1 x 10-2 cm/sec.
(ii)
Have a minimum
thickness of one foot.
(c)
Include a means
to automatically remove leachate from the bottom of the facility. Leachate
collection shall comply with the following:
(i)
Be designed to
collect leachate within the limits of waste placement.
(ii)
Be designed to
be capable of maintaining less than a one foot depth of leachate over the
liner, excluding the leachate sump collection point.
(iii)
Have a minimum
slope of 2.0 per cent.
(iv)
Have lengths and configuration that do not exceed the
capabilities of clean-out devices.
(v)
Be provided with
access for clean-out devices, as specified by the director, that are protected
from differential settling. An alternative means for leachate removal may be
used if it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the director or his
authorized representative that the means for leachate removal meets the
requirements of this paragraph.
(vi)
Any lift
stations are protected from adverse effects from leachate and differential
settling. Lift stations shall be equipped with automatic high level alarms
located no greater than six feet above the invert of the leachate inlet pipe.
Lift station pumps shall be of adequate capacity and automatically commence
pumping before the leachate elevation activates the high level alarm or if a
gravity drainage system is used, be of adequate capacity to meet the
requirements of paragraph (B)(6)(c) of this rule.
(d)
Include a filter
layer, to prevent clogging of the leachate collection system.
(e)
Include a
protective layer to protect the recompacted soil liner and leachate collection
system from damage due to dessication, freeze/thaw cycles, wet/dry cycles, and
the intrusion of objects during construction and operation.
(f)
Any leachate
conveyance and storage structures located outside of the limits of scrap tire
placement are no less protective of the environment than the scrap tire
monofill facility, as determined by Ohio EPA, and complies with the
following:
(i)
Be monitored, as specified by Ohio EPA.
(ii)
For storage
structures, have a minimum of one week of storage capacity using design
assumptions simulating final closure completed in accordance with rule
3745-580-725 of the
Administrative Code.
(iii)
For storage tanks, be provided with spill
containment.
(iv)
If, at any time, leachate is evaluated to be hazardous
in accordance with rule
3745-52-11 of the Administrative
Code, it is managed in accordance with Chapters
3745-50 to
3745-69 of the Administrative
Code, and the generator standards for storage in accordance with Chapter
3745-52 of the Administrative
Code.
(g)
Treat and dispose of leachate in accordance with one of
the following:
(i)
At the facility.
(ii)
Through on-site
pretreatment and either transported or piped off-site for final treatment and
disposal.
(iii)
Through transportation or piping off-site for treatment
and disposal.
(7)
Ground water
control structures that comply with the following:
(a)
Permanent ground
water control structures that adequately control ground water infiltration
through the use of non-mechanical means such as impermeable barriers or
permeable drainage structures. The owner or operator shall not use permanent
ground water control structures to dewater an aquifer system, except if the
recharge and discharge zone of the aquifer system are located entirely within
the boundary of the scrap tire monofill.
(b)
For purposes of
controlling ground water infiltration until sufficient load has been placed in
all locations across the facility such that a 1.40 factor of safety for
hydrostatic uplift is achieved, a pumping system of a temporary ground water
control structure that meets the following:
(i)
Includes a
high-level alarm set at an elevation no higher than the base of the recompacted
soil liner being protected by the temporary ground water control
structure.
(ii)
In the event of a power failure, be supplied with power
not later than one hour after the power failure occurring.
(iii)
In the event of
a pump failure, be supplied with a replacement pump not later than twelve hours
after a pump failure occurring.
(8)
Surface water
control structures that comply with the following:
(a)
Any permanent or
temporary surface water control structures that at a minimum are designed to
accommodate, by non-mechanical means, the peak flow from the twenty-five year,
twenty-four hour storm event and to minimize silting and
scouring.
(b)
Any sedimentation ponds that are designed and
constructed in accordance with the following:
(i)
With a minimum
storage volume based on either the calculated runoff volume from a ten year,
twenty-four hour storm event, or 0.125 acre-feet per year, for each acre of
disturbed area within the upstream drainage area, multiplied by the scheduled
frequency of pond clean-out (in years), whichever is greater.
(ii)
To ensure the
principal spillway safely discharges the flow from a ten year, twenty-four hour
storm event, the inlet elevation of the emergency spillway is designed to
provide flood storage, with no flow entering the emergency spillway, for a
twenty-five year, twenty-four hour storm event, with allowance provided for the
flow passed by the principal spillway during the event.
(iii)
To ensure the
combination of principal and emergency spillways safely discharges the flow
from a one hundred year, twenty-four hour storm event, the embankment design
provides for no less than one foot net freeboard when flow is at the design
depth, after allowance for embankment settlement.
(9)
Survey
mark. With at least one permanent survey mark established prior to any
construction and within easy access to the limits of scrap tire placement in
accordance with the following:
(a)
Referenced horizontally to the 1983 North American
datum, or state plane coordinate system and vertically to the 1988 North
American vertical sea level datum as identified by the national geodetic
survey.
(b)
At least as stable as a poured concrete monument ten
inches in diameter installed to a depth of forty-two inches below the ground
surface. The survey mark shall include a corrosion resistant metallic disk that
indicates horizontal and vertical coordinates of the survey mark and contain a
magnet or ferromagnetic rod to allow identification through magnetic detection
methods.
(c)
Survey control standards for the survey mark are in
accordance with the following:
(i)
The minimum horizontal distance accuracy is one foot
horizontal to two thousand five hundred feet horizontal.
(ii)
The minimum
vertical accuracy is one inch to five thousand feet horizontal.
(10)
Grades of access roads that do not exceed twelve per
cent and are designed to allow passage of loaded vehicles during all weather
conditions with minimum erosion, dust generation, and with adequate
drainage.
(11)
The cap system that complies with the following:
(a)
Minimize
infiltration.
(b)
Include a geotextile fabric placed on top of the scrap
tires.
(c)
Include a barrier layer placed on top of the geotextile
fabric consisting of one of the following:
(i)
A recompacted
soil barrier layer, a minimum of sixty inches thick constructed in accordance
with the specifications in paragraphs (B)(4)(a) to (B)(4)(e), (B)(4)(g), and
(B)(4)(o) of this rule.
(ii)
A geosynthetic clay liner constructed in accordance
with the specifications in paragraph (B)(5) of this rule, placed on top of an
eighteen inch engineered subgrade.
(iii)
A flexible
membrane liner constructed in accordance with the specifications of in
paragraph (I)(3) of this rule, placed on top of an eighteen inch engineered
subgrade or geosynthetic clay liner.
(d)
Include a
drainage layer placed on top of a flexible membrane liner or geosynthetic clay
liner, that is either of the following:
(i)
Consist of
granular drainage material a minimum of one foot thick with a permeability of 1
x 10-3 cm/s. The granular cap drainage layer shall
not be placed over wrinkles in the flexible membrane liner that are greater
than four inches in height.
(ii)
Consist of
geocomposite drainage layer with a minimum transmissivity to ensure that the
cap system meets the slope stability requirements of this rule. The
transmissivity shall be adjusted for elastic deformation, creep deformation,
biological clogging, and chemical clogging by using the appropriate reduction
factors.
(e)
Include a cap protection layer placed above the
drainage layer consisting of soil, a minimum of twenty-four inches thick,
constructed with soil that meets one of the following:
(i)
Is classified as
a "CL" in accordance with ASTM D2487.
(ii)
Has a maximum
permeability of 1 x 10-5 cm/sec determined in
accordance with ASTM D5084 or other method acceptable to Ohio EPA at a
frequency of no less than one test per five acres. The locations of the
individual tests shall be adequately spaced to represent the constructed area
with any penetrations repaired.
[Comment: The minimum cap protection
layer requirement may include six inches of vegetative layer.]
(f)
Include a vegetative layer, consisting of soil and
vegetation, as the surface of the cap system, that meets the following:
(i)
Be of sufficient
thickness and fertility to support its vegetation and to protect the
recompacted soil barrier layer and flexible membrane liner from damage due to
root penetration. The vegetative layer shall be constructed in a manner that
healthy grasses or other vegetation can form a complete and dense vegetative
cover not later than one year after placement.
(ii)
Have the slopes
and the final elevations specified in the permit to install for the
facility.
(iii)
Have a maximum projected erosion rate of five tons per
acre per year.
(iv)
Be constructed with best management practices for
erosion control.
(g)
Any penetrations
into the cap system are sealed so that the integrity of the recompacted soil
barrier layer is maintained.
(h)
Comparable
materials or thicknesses for the soil barrier layer, the granular drainage
layer, and the soil vegetative layer may be used if it is demonstrated to Ohio
EPA that the alternative meets the requirements of this
paragraph.
(12)
Engineered subgrade that complies with the
following:
(a)
Be free of solid waste, debris, foreign material,
deleterious material, and not contain large objects in such quantities as may
interfere with its application and intended purpose. The surface shall not have
sharp edged or protruding particles.
(b)
Be determined to
have adequate strength to satisfy bearing capacity and slope stability strength
requirements.
(c)
Not have any abrupt changes in grade that may result in
damage to the geosynthetic clay liner or flexible membrane
liner.
(13)
The design for the stability of all engineered
components and the waste mass addresses any configuration throughout the
applicable development and postclosure care periods. Potential failures
associated with internal, interim, and final slopes as these slopes are
depicted in the permit to install application, shall be used to define the
minimum construction specifications and materials that at a minimum meet the
following:
(a)
Have a factor of safety for hydrostatic uplift of not less
than 1.40 at any location during the construction and operation of the
facility.
(b)
Have a factor of safety for bearing capacity of any
vertical sump risers on the liner system of not less than 3.0.
(c)
Have a factor of
safety for static slope stability of not less than 1.50 using two dimensional
limit equilibrium methods or another factor of safety using a method acceptable
to Ohio EPA when assessed for any of the following failure modes and
conditions:
(i)
Deep-seated translational and deep-seated rotational failure
mechanisms of internal slopes, interim slopes, and final slopes for drained
conditions. For slopes containing geosynthetic interfaces placed at grades
greater than 5.0 per cent, large displacement shear strength conditions shall
be used for any soil to geosynthetic or geosynthetic to geosynthetic
interfaces.
[Comment: Ohio EPA considers any
failure that occurs through a material or along an interface that is loaded
with more than one thousand four hundred forty pounds per square foot to be a
deep seated failure mode.]
(ii)
Shallow
translational and shallow rotational failure mechanisms of internal slopes and
final slopes for drained conditions.
[Comment: Peak shear strengths can be
used for most shallow failure modes.]
(d)
Have a factor of
safety for static slope stability of not less than 1.30 using two dimensional
limit equilibrium methods or another factor of safety using a method acceptable
to Ohio EPA when assessed for deep seated translational and deep seated
rotational failure mechanisms of internal slopes, interim slopes, and final
slopes for undrained conditions resulting from loading or unloading of the
slopes. The analysis shall assume that the weight of the material is loaded or
unloaded all at one time without time for pore pressure dissipation or, if the
facility is designed using staged loading calculations, then the analysis
assumes that the weight of the material is loaded or unloaded all at one time
at the end of the time it takes to construct the stage.
(e)
Include
calculations for seismic slope deformation that demonstrate deformations in the
cap system are limited to thirty centimeters and deformations in the bottom
liner are limited to fifteen centimeters when assessed for any of the following
failure modes and conditions:
(i)
Deep-seated translational and deep-seated rotational
failure mechanisms of final slopes for drained conditions and as applicable
conditions representing the presence of excess pore water pressure at the onset
of loading or unloading. For slopes containing geosynthetic interfaces, large
displacement shear strength conditions shall be used for any soil to
geosynthetic or geosynthetic to geosynthetic interfaces.
(ii)
Shallow
translational and shallow rotational failure mechanisms of final slopes for
unsaturated conditions. For slopes containing geosynthetic interfaces, large
displacement shear strength conditions shall be used for any soil to
geosynthetic or geosynthetic to geosynthetic interfaces.
(f)
Have a
factor of safety against liquefaction of not less than 1.00 for internal
slopes, interim slopes and final slopes.
(g)
Have a factor of
safety for static slope stability of not less than 1.10 using two dimensional
limit equilibrium methods or other methods acceptable to Ohio EPA when assessed
for any of the following failure modes and conditions:
(i)
If specified by
Ohio EPA, shallow translational and shallow rotational failure mechanisms of
internal slopes in which the protective soils over the leachate collection
layer have reached field capacity with calculations using the maximum head
predicted for the fifty year, one hour design storm.
(ii)
Shallow
translational and shallow rotational failure mechanisms of final slopes in
which the cover soils over the drainage layer have reached field capacity with
calculations using the maximum head predicted for the one hundred year, one
hour design storm.
(h)
The design of any
geosynthetic materials specified as an engineered component, including but not
limited to, flexible membrane liner, and geosynthetic clay liner, shall not
rely on any of the tensile qualities of the geosynthetic
component.
(C)
Material
suitability testing. The results of the following tests shall meet all
applicable specifications in this rule and the set of approved parameters in
the permit to install application that were established by the slope stability
analysis, be evaluated and signed and sealed by a professional engineer
registered in the state of Ohio, and be submitted to the appropriate Ohio EPA
district office not later than seven days prior to the intended use of the
materials in the construction of the scrap tire monofill facility:
(1)
For the soil
material used in construction of the recompacted soil liner and cap soil
barrier layer, all of the following performed on representative samples:
(a)
Recompacted
permeability at construction specifications at a frequency of no less than once
for every ten thousand cubic yards.
(b)
The maximum dry
density and optimum moisture content in accordance with ASTM D698 or ASTM D1557
at a frequency of no less than once for every one thousand five hundred cubic
yards.
(c)
Grain size distribution in accordance with ASTM D6913
and ASTM D7928 at a frequency of no less than once for every one thousand five
hundred cubic yards on recompacted soil liner material and at a frequency of no
less than once for every three thousand cubic yards on cap soil barrier
layer.
(d)
Atterberg limits in accordance with ASTM D4318 at a
frequency of no less than once for every one thousand five hundred cubic yards
on recompacted soil liner material and at a frequency of no less than once for
every three thousand cubic yards on cap soil barrier layer.
(e)
For recompacted
soil liner, the dispersive clay soils classification by pinhole test in
accordance with ASTM D4647 at a frequency of no less than once for every fifty
thousand cubic yards.
(2)
For geosynthetic
clay liner, the following:
(a)
If the internal drained shear strength is at higher
risk of slope failure than the interfaces tested in accordance with paragraph
(E) of this rule, the internal drained shear strength in accordance with ASTM
D6243 at least twice for the initial use and at least once for each subsequent
construction event. Tests involving geosynthetic clay liner material shall be
conducted with hydrated samples.
[Comment: If a shear stress point plots
below the Mohr-Coulomb shear strength failure envelope defined by the specified
factor of safety, it will be considered a failed test.]
(b)
The dry bentonite
mass (at zero per cent moisture content) per square foot of geosynthetic clay
liners in accordance with ASTM D5993 at a frequency of no less than once per
fifty thousand square feet.
(3)
For the granular
drainage material used as drainage medium, permeability in accordance with ASTM
D2434 to be tested at least once for every three thousand cubic yards of
material.
(4)
For any geocomposite drainage layer, to be tested for
transmissivity in accordance with ASTM D4716 at the maximum projected load and
a frequency of once per five hundred thousand square feet performed in a manner
representing field conditions.
(5)
For soil material
used as cap protection layer and to be classified as a "CL" in accordance with
ASTM D2487, the following:
(a)
Grain size distribution in accordance with ASTM D6913
and ASTM D7928 at a frequency of no less than once for every three thousand
cubic yards.
(b)
Atterberg limits in accordance with ASTM D4318 at a
frequency of no less than once for every three thousand cubic
yards.
(6)
For soil material used as added geologic material, the
following:
(a)
The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content in
accordance with ASTM D698 or ASTM D1557 at a frequency of no less than once for
every ten thousand cubic yards.
(b)
The recompacted
laboratory permeability in accordance with ASTM D5084 at a frequency of no less
than once for every ten thousand cubic yards.
(c)
The dispersive
clay soils classification by pinhole test in accordance with ASTM D4647 at a
frequency of no less than once for every fifty thousand cubic
yards.
(d)
Atterberg limits in accordance with ASTM D4318 at a
frequency of no less than once for every three thousand cubic
yards.
(7)
For soil material used as structural fill, the maximum
dry density and optimum moisture content in accordance with ASTM D698 or ASTM
D1557 at a frequency of no less than once for every ten thousand cubic
yards.
(D)
For geosynthetics, other synthetic materials, and joint
sealing compounds used in the construction of flexible membrane liner,
geosynthetic clay liner, and leachate management system, the materials shall
comply with the following:
(1)
Be shown to be physically and chemically resistant to
attack by the scrap tires, leachate, or other materials that they may come in
contact with, in accordance with USEPA method 9090 or other documented data.
Chemical compatibility testing may be necessary if specified by the
director.
(2)
Be shown to have properties acceptable for installation
and use.
(E)
Pre-construction interface testing and reporting. The
specific soils and representative samples of the geosynthetic materials that
will be used at the site shall be tested for interface shear strength over the
entire range of normal stresses that will develop at the facility. Prior to the
initial use of each specific geosynthetic material in the construction of
engineered components at a facility, the appropriate shear strengths for all
soil to geosynthetic and geosynthetic to geosynthetic interfaces that include
the material shall be determined at least twice in accordance with ASTM D5321
or ASTM D6243 and at least once for each subsequent construction event using
samples of the materials identified by the initial two tests to be at the
highest risk for slope failure. Tests involving the flexible membrane liner
interface shall be conducted with a recompacted soil that has the highest
moisture content and the lowest density specified for construction of the
recompacted soil liner. Tests involving geosynthetic clay liner material shall
be conducted with hydrated samples. The results of preconstruction testing
specified in this rule shall meet all applicable specifications in this rule
and the set of approved parameters in the permit to install application that
were established by the slope stability analysis, be evaluated and signed and
sealed by a professional engineer registered in the state of Ohio, and be
submitted to the appropriate Ohio EPA district office not later than seven days
prior to the intended use of the materials.
(F)
Quality
assurance/quality control. The owner or operator of a scrap tire monofill
facility shall demonstrate that the construction of the facility will be in
accordance with the applicable authorizing documents including any approved
permit to install in a quality assurance/quality control plan that includes the
following, as applicable:
(1)
The following components:
(a)
In-situ
foundation preparation.
(b)
Added geologic material.
(c)
Structural
fill.
(d)
Liner system.
(e)
Leachate
management system.
(f)
Cap system.
(g)
Ground water
control structures.
(h)
Surface water control structures.
(i)
Facility survey
mark.
(j)
Access roads.
(2)
The following
testing procedures:
(a)
Sampling and testing procedures to be used in the field
and in the laboratory.
(b)
Testing frequency.
(c)
Parameters and
sample locations.
(d)
Procedures to be followed if a test
fails.
(e)
The management structure and the experience and
training of the testing personnel.
(f)
Contingency plan
if construction difficulties are anticipated.
(G)
All
tests failing to meet the specifications outlined in this rule shall be
investigated. An area with a verified failure shall be reconstructed to meet
specifications and retested at a frequency acceptable to the director.
Reconstruction and retesting shall be performed in accordance with paragraph
(C) of rule
3745-580-710 of the
Administrative Code.
(H)
Construction certification report. Pursuant to
paragraph (C) of rule
3745-580-710 of the
Administrative Code and paragraph (H) of rule
3745-580-725 of the
Administrative Code, the owner or operator of a scrap tire monofill facility
shall submit a certification report prepared and sealed by a professional
engineer registered in Ohio to Ohio EPA and the approved board of health. The
owner or operator may submit all certification reports for concurrence after
construction of both the liner and leachate collection systems, prior to the
acceptance of scrap tires, or upon installation of any of the engineering
components specified in the liner and leachate collection systems in each phase
of the scrap tire monofill facility construction. The certification report
shall include the following:
(1)
Results of all testing specified in this rule and the
testing specified in the quality assurance/quality control
plan.
(2)
Any alterations and all other changes are to be
presented as follows:
(a)
A listing of all alterations previously concurred with
by Ohio EPA and a copy of all concurrence letters.
(b)
All alteration
requests and supporting documentation which are proposed by the owner or
operator for concurrence with the construction certification report.
[Comment: Paragraph (C) of rule
3745-580-710 of the
Administrative Code specifies that the owner or operator needs to obtain Ohio
EPA's written concurrence with the certification report prior to placing scrap
tires in the phase.]
(c)
A list of any
other changes made by the owner or operator that do not need Ohio EPA
concurrence but that affect construction or the record drawing.
[Comment: The listing of these changes
is for Ohio EPA's informational purposes only.]
(3)
Record drawings of the constructed facility components
showing the following:
(a)
Plan views showing the grades of the following, as
appropriate:
(i)
The limits of excavation.
(ii)
The bottom of
the recompacted soil liner or barrier layer.
(iii)
The top of the
recompacted soil liner or barrier layer.
(iv)
The
configuration of the leachate management system and the top of the drainage
layer.
(v)
The limits of emplaced waste.
(vi)
The top of the
cap system.
(vii)
The surface water management system.
(viii)
Access
roads.
(b)
Plan view of the location of ground water control
structures, if applicable.
(c)
Plan views of the
deployment of the flexible membrane liner panels and the locations of and
identification of the destructive tests and all repairs.
(d)
Cross sections of
the phase at closure taken at the same locations and using the same scale as in
the approved permit to install or at an interval no greater than every three
hundred feet of length and width that show the following:
(i)
The limits of
excavation.
(ii)
The limits of emplaced waste.
(iii)
Final grade
including the cap system.
(e)
Necessary
details.
(4)
For a scrap tire monofill facility, after the initial
construction and establishment of the facility survey mark, the following
information summarizing the activities performed to construct and establish the
facility survey mark:
(a)
The geodetic survey datasheet of each control point
used to establish the horizontal and vertical coordinates of the survey
mark.
(b)
A table listing the horizontal and vertical coordinates
of each control point and survey mark.
(c)
A summary of
surveying activities performed in determining the coordinates of the facility
survey mark.
(d)
A plan sheet clearly identifying the location of the
survey mark, the control points, and the limits of waste placement on a road
map with a scale of one inch equals no greater than one mile.
(e)
A detailed
drawing illustrating the design of the facility survey mark, as
constructed.
(5)
Documentation demonstrating that any oil or gas wells
that have been identified within the limits of solid waste placement have been
properly plugged and abandoned in accordance with Chapter 1509. of the Revised
Code prior to any construction in the area of the well.
(6)
Qualifications of
construction, testing, and construction quality assurance and control personnel
including a description of the experience, training, responsibilities in
decision making, and other qualifications of the personnel that provided
construction oversight and conducted all the testing on the engineered
component for which the certification report is submitted.
(7)
A signed
statement that to the best of the knowledge of the owner or operator of the
scrap tire monofill facility, the certification report is true, accurate, and
contains all information specified paragraph (E) of this rule.
(I)
Submergence facilities. The owner or operator of a
scrap tire submergence facility shall comply with the following construction
requirements:
(1)
All construction requirements specified in this rule
except the following:
(a)
Paragraph (B)(6) of this rule.
(b)
Paragraph (B)(11)
of this rule.
(c)
Paragraphs (F)(1)(e) and (F)(1)(f) of this
rule.
(d)
Paragraphs (H)(3)(a)(iv), (H)(3)(a)(v), and
(H)(3)(d)(iii) of this rule.
(2)
A flexible
membrane liner may be placed on top of one of the options for a recompacted
soil liner described in paragraph (B)(4)(k) of this rule.
(3)
A flexible
membrane liner that is placed on the recompacted soil liner or recompacted soil
barrier layer and meets the following:
(a)
Be sixty mil high
density polyethylene (HDPE).
(b)
Be an other
material or thickness if the flexible membrane liner meets at a minimum the
following:
(i)
Be negligibly permeable to fluid migration.
(ii)
Be physically
and chemically resistant to chemical attack by the scrap tires, leachate, or
other materials that may come in contact with the flexible membrane
liner.
(iii)
Have properties for installation and use that are
acceptable to Ohio EPA.
(iv)
Have a minimum thickness of forty
mils.
(c)
Be installed as follows:
(i)
For installations
exceeding ten thousand square feet, with at least one welding technician having
seamed a minimum of one million square feet of flexible membrane liner present
during installation.
(ii)
Be seamed to allow no more than negligible amounts of
leakage with seaming material that is physically and chemically resistant to
chemical attack by the scrap tires, leachate, or other materials that may come
in contact with the seams.
(iii)
On a seaming
area that is cleaned of deleterious materials immediately prior to
seaming.
(iv)
Be tested in accordance with the following, unless the
manufacturer's specifications for testing are more stringent:
(a)
For the purpose
of testing every seaming apparatus in use each day, peel and shear tests
performed on scrap pieces of flexible membrane liner at the beginning of the
seaming period and every four hours thereafter.
(b)
Nondestructive
testing performed on one hundred per cent of the flexible membrane liner
seams.
(c)
Destructive testing for peel and shear performed at
least once for every one thousand feet of seam length. An alternative means may
be used if it is demonstrated to Ohio EPA that the alternative means meets the
requirements of this paragraph.
(d)
Electrical leak
locations testing in accordance with ASTM D7002, ASTM D7703, ASTM D7240, or
ASTM D7953 performed on one hundred per cent of the flexible membrane liner
prior to initial backfill over the flexible membrane liner.
(e)
Electrical leak
locations testing in accordance with ASTM D6707 performed on one hundred per
cent of the flexible membrane liner after initial backfilling over the flexible
membrane liner.
(v)
Be protected with a sixteen ounce liner cushion layer
if the potential exists for the flexible membrane liner to come in contact with
any sharp edged protrusions or any particles protruding more than one quarter
of one inch. The liner cushion layer shall account for the weight of the
overlying waste mass and have pre-construction interface testing performed
according to paragraph (E) of this rule. If shredded tires are used in the
leachate collection layer, a cushion layer consisting of sand, or other
material with low puncture risk, a minimum of ten inches thick shall be
used.
(4)
Alternatives to the construction requirements in
paragraph (B) of this rule may be used if it is demonstrated to the
satisfaction of the director or the director's authorized representative that
the alternative provides equivalent protection of human health, safety, and the
environment.