Current through all regulations passed and filed through September 16, 2024
[Comment: For dates of non-regulatory
government publications, publications of recognized organizations and
associations, federal rules and federal statutory provisions referenced in this
rule, see rule
3745-2-02 of the Administrative
Code.]
(A)
Administrative procedures.
(1)
At a minimum,
total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) shall be established in accordance with the
listing and priority setting process established in Section 303(d) of the act
and
40
C.F.R. 130.7.
(2)
The director
shall do the following for stakeholder involvement during TMDL development in
accordance with section
6111.562 of the Revised
Code:
(a)
Provide notice of and opportunity for input during the
development of a TMDL at each of the following stages:
(i)
The project
assessment study plan, including portions of the plan that seek to determine
the causes and sources of impairments or threats.
(ii)
The biological
and water quality study report or an equivalent report.
(iii)
The loading
analysis plan, including, but not limited to, the proposed modeling approach
and the water quality restoration targets, goals or criteria.
(iv)
The preliminary
modeling results including the following:
(a)
Any management
choices.
(b)
Load allocations (LAs) for nonpoint sources of
pollutants.
(c)
Wasteload allocations (WLAs) for point sources of
pollutants.
(d)
Allowances for margin of safety and future
growth.
(e)
Permit limits necessary to achieve the
WLAs.
(f)
Preliminary TMDL implementation plan establishing
specific actions, schedules and monitoring proposed to effectuate a
TMDL.
(b)
Provide notice as
required in paragraph (A)(2)(a) of this rule to the following
stakeholders:
(i)
Potentially affected dischargers.
(ii)
County soil and
water conservation districts.
(iii)
Other
interested stakeholders. This may include a watershed specific stakeholder
distribution list or listserv.
(c)
Allow not less
than thirty days for input at each stage required in paragraph (A)(2)(a) of
this rule.
(d)
For TMDLs in development prior to September 29, 2017,
provide at least two opportunities for stakeholder input prior to submittal of
the TMDL to U.S. EPA for approval.
[Comment: The director may provide
stakeholder notification through posting of information on the Ohio EPA website
and electronic notifications, or first class mail if electronic means are not
available.]
[Comment: The director may convene a
watershed advisory committee to provide input to Ohio EPA on an individual
project throughout the TMDL development process.]
[Comment: The director may organize
stakeholder meetings during the development of a TMDL depending upon the level
of stakeholder interest in a given watershed.]
(3)
Official draft TMDL. The director shall prepare an official
draft TMDL prior to establishing a final TMDL, as follows:
(a)
The official
draft TMDL shall include both of the following:
(i)
An estimate of
the total amount of each pollutant that causes water quality impairment from
all sources.
(ii)
An estimate of the total amount of pollutants that may
be added to the water of the state while still allowing the water of the state
to achieve and maintain applicable water quality standards.
(b)
The
director shall provide public notice of the official draft TMDL in accordance
with rule
3745-49-07 of the Administrative
Code. In addition to the information required by rule
3745-49-08 of the Administrative
Code, the public notice shall specify both of the following:
(i)
The water of the
state to which the official draft TMDL relates.
(ii)
The time, date
and location of the public hearing, if applicable.
(c)
The director
shall send the public notice to the following stakeholders:
(i)
All individuals
NPDES permit holders that discharge into the water of the state to which the
official draft TMDL relates.
(ii)
All significant
industrial users listed in the permit holders' annual report.
(iii)
Other
stakeholders that provided input during the development of the TMDL in
accordance with paragraph (A)(2) of this rule.
(iv)
Agency listservs
or wastershed specific stakeholder distribution list, if
available.
(d)
The director shall allow not less than sixty days for
comment on the official draft TMDL.
(e)
The director
shall provide an opportunity for public hearing regarding the official draft
TMDL if there is significant public interest. Interested persons may request,
in writing, that Ohio EPA hold a public hearing on an official draft TMDL
within thirty days after the public notice of the official draft TMDL. Requests
shall state the nature of issues proposed to be raised at the hearing. Ohio EPA
will hold a public hearing if any of the following occur:
(i)
Requests are made
from one or more public officials, any affected state, U.S. EPA or other
federal agency.
(ii)
Requests are made from seven or more
citizens.
(iii)
Request is made from an organized citizens group,
including watershed groups, trade associations or other non-profit
organizations, or potentially impacted entities.
(iv)
The director
determines that the public interest would be served by holding a
hearing.
(f)
The director shall prepare and make available a written
responsiveness summary of the comments received during the applicable comment
period on the official draft TMDL. The director may consider comments received
after the comment deadline as time and circumstances allow.
(4)
Final
TMDL. After completion of the items in paragraph (A)(3) of this rule if the
director determines it is appropriate to complete the TMDL, the director shall
establish a final TMDL and submit the final TMDL to U.S. EPA for approval. A
final TMDL may be challenged in accordance with section
6111.564 of the Revised
Code.
(5)
TMDL modifications. The director may modify an official
draft, final or U.S. EPA approved TMDL. A modification, other than a
modification to a draft or final TMDL consistent with comments received, is
subject to the requirements in paragraph (A)(3) of this rule.
(6)
Where a TMDL is
not required by paragraph (A)(1) of this rule or it is not technically feasible
to complete development of a TMDL prior to NPDES permit issuance or renewal
deadlines for a discharge to a TMDL assessment area, Ohio EPA may develop water
quality based effluent limits (WQBELs) for a discharge in the absence of a TMDL
pursuant to rules
3745-2-04 to
3745-2-11 of the Administrative
Code.
(B)
Development of TMDLs.
(1)
At a minimum, the
following factors shall be considered when determining an assessment area for a
TMDL:
(a)
Area
of impact.
(b)
A linkage of the impaired use and the pollutant to be
reduced.
(c)
Significance of the pollutant of
concern.
(d)
Location, type, significance and interaction of
pollutant sources.
(e)
The critical conditions and seasonality of the impacts
from the pollutant.
(f)
Availability of information.
(g)
Treatability of
pollutant and pollutant sources.
(h)
Resources
available to develop the TMDL implementation plan.
(i)
Resources
available for implementing the TMDL implementation plan.
(j)
Coordination with
other Ohio EPA programs and program requirements.
(k)Federal
regulations and guidance regarding TMDLs.
(2)
A TMDL shall be
determined as the sum of all existing or projected loads of a pollutant to the
TMDL assessment area from point sources, nonpoint sources and background
sources. The sum of the loads shall not be greater than the loading capacity of
the receiving water for the pollutant minus a specified margin of safety (MOS)
and any capacity reserved for future growth.
(3)
The background
concentration of a pollutant for the purpose of establishing a TMDL shall be
determined in accordance with rule
3745-2-05 of the Administrative
Code. The director may apply alternative procedures to determine background
concentrations if necessary to account for all conditions considered in the
TMDL, including, but not limited to, cases where background concentrations vary
substantially with flow such that a background concentration derived in
accordance with rule
3745-2-05 of the Administrative
code may not be appropriate.
(4)
The loading
capacity for the purpose of establishing a TMDL shall be determined as the
largest load of a pollutant that a water body can receive without violating
water quality standards at any applicable site within the TMDL implementation
plan assessment area (outside of applicable mixing zones). Separate loading
capacities may be determined for each flow condition or season applicable to
the TMDL. Pollutant loads for sources which only affect the receiving water at
certain flow conditions shall be determined to maintain only the loading
capacities applicable at those conditions.
(5)
Each TMDL shall
include a MOS sufficient to account for technical uncertainties in establishing
the TMDL. The TMDL implementation plan shall describe the manner in which the
MOS is determined and incorporated into the TMDL. The MOS may be provided by
leaving a portion of the loading capacity unallocated or by using conservation
modeling assumptions to establish WLAs and LAs.
(6)
TMDLs may include
reserved allocations of loading capacity to accommodate various needs
including, but not limited to, future growth, additional sources and
environmental reserves. Where adequate reserved allocations are not included in
a TMDL, any increased loadings of the pollutant for which the TMDL was
developed that are due to a new or expanded discharge shall not be allowed
unless the TMDL is revised in accordance with this rule and section
6111.563 of the Revised Code to
include an allocation for the new or expanded discharge.
(7)
Where appropriate
and where sufficient data are available, TMDLs shall reflect contributions to
the water column from sediments inside and outside of any applicable mixing
zones. TMDLs shall be sufficiently stringent so as to prevent accumulation of
the pollutant of concern in sediments to levels injurious to designated or
existing uses, human health, wildlife and aquatic life
criteria.
(8)
TMDLs shall be based on the assumption that a pollutant
does not degrade. However, the director may take into account degradation of
the pollutant if each of the following conditions are met:
(a)
Scientifically
valid field studies or other relevant information demonstrate that degradation
of the pollutant is expected to occur under the full range of environmental
conditions expected to be encountered.
(b)
Scientifically
valid field studies or other relevant information address other factors that
affect the level of pollutants in the water column including, but not limited
to, resuspension of sediments, chemical speciation and biological and chemical
transformation.
(9)
TMDLs for metals
shall be determined based on the total recoverable form of that metal provided
by all sources considered in that TMDL. The loading capacity for that TMDL
shall be determined to maintain the total recoverable criteria applicable to
that metal, with the following exceptions:
(a)
A WLA may be
based on dissolved criteria in accordance with rule
3745-2-04 of the Administrative
Code, provided that the WLA does not result in a total recoverable load in
excess of that allocated to the point source as part of an established
TMDL.
(b)
The loading capacity may be based on an effective total
recoverable criteria, determined from applicable dissolved criteria in
accordance with rule
3745-2-04 of the Administrative
Code, provided that the dissolved metal translator applied in determination of
the effective total recoverable criteria can be demonstrated to be appropriate
and protective for all sources of that metal and all receiving water conditions
considered in the TMDL.
(10)
TMDLs shall
reflect, where appropriate and where sufficient data are available, point
source and nonpoint source pollutant loads resulting from wet weather
events.
(11)
In addition to the requirements of paragraphs (B)(1) to
(B)(10) of this rule, the director shall consider and evaluate the factors in
divisions (B) and (C) of section
6111.562 of the Revised
Code.
(C)
Nonpoint source load allocations (LAs).
(1)
For the purpose
of establishing a TMDL, LAs shall be based on at least the following
information:
(a)
Existing pollutant loadings if changes in loadings are
not reasonably anticipated to occur.
(b)
Increases in
pollutant loadings that are reasonably anticipated to occur.
(c)
Anticipated
decreases in pollutant loadings if such decreased loadings are technically
feasible and are reasonably anticipated to occur within a reasonable time
period as a result of implementation of best management practices or other load
reduction measures.
(2)
For LAs
established on the basis of paragraph (C)(1)(c) of this rule, monitoring data
shall be collected and analyzed in order to validate the TMDL's assumptions, to
verify anticipated load reductions, to evaluate the effectiveness of controls
being used to implement the TMDL implementation plan and to revise the point
source allocations and LAs as necessary to ensure that water quality standards
will be achieved within the time-period established in the
TMDL.
(3)
For nonpoint sources considered in a TMDL that may
affect the receiving water at stream flows at or below the stream design flows
applicable under rule
3745-2-05 of the Administrative
Code, LAs established in a TMDL shall be determined in accordance with rule
3745-2-05 of the Administrative
Code such that water quality criteria are maintained at the design
conditions.
(4)
For nonpoint sources considered in a TMDL that only
affect the receiving water at stream flows higher than the stream design flows
applicable under rule
3745-2-05 of the Administrative
Code, LAs may be established using stream flows and procedures that the
director determines are appropriate for that nonpoint source and ensure that
applicable water quality standards will be maintained whenever that nonpoint
source load occurs.
(D)
Point source
wasteload allocations (WLAs). Pollutant loads allocated to point sources in a
TMDL shall be used to determine WLAs for those point sources.
(1)
If TMDLs are
established in TMDL implementation plans for different segments of the same
watershed and include allocations for the same pollutant for the same point
source, then WLAs for that pollutant and point source shall be consistent with
the most stringent of those allocations.
(2)
For point sources
considered in a TMDL that discharge at stream flows at or below the stream
design flows applicable under rule
3745-2-05 of the Administrative
Code, WLAs shall be determined in accordance with rule
3745-2-05 of the Administrative
Code such that water quality criteria are maintained at the design
conditions.
(3)
For point sources considered in a TMDL that only
discharge at stream flows higher than the stream design flows applicable under
rule 3745-2-05 of the Administrative
Code, WLAs may be established using stream flows and procedures that the
director determined are appropriate for that point source and ensure that
applicable water quality standards will be maintained whenever that point
source load occurs.
(4)
WLAs determined as part of a TMDL shall be used to
determine WQBELs for that discharge in accordance with rule
3745-2-06 of the Administrative
Code.
(E)
TMDL Implementation.
(1)
TMDLs shall be
established and implemented through a TMDL implementation plan. An
implementation plan shall address attainment of applicable water quality
standards, determined in accordance with rule
3745-2-04 of the Administrative
Code (or as otherwise applicable in accordance with Chapter 3745-1 of the
Administrative Code) for each pollutant for which a TMDL is
established.
(2)
Where an assessment and remediation plan meets the
requirements of this rule and the public participation requirements applicable
to TMDLs, Ohio EPA may use the assessment and remediation plan in lieu of a
TMDL implementation plan. Assessment and remediation plans may include, but are
not limited to, the lake Erie lakewide management plan, remedial action plans
and water quality management plans. Any part of an assessment and remediation
plan that satisfies one or more requirements under Section 303(d) of the act or
the act's implementing regulations may be part of a TMDL implementation
plan.
(3)
A TMDL implementation plan may be based on attaining
water quality standards over a period of time, with specific controls on
individual sources being implemented in stages. Where implementing a TMDL
implementation plan will not immediately attain water quality standards, the
TMDL implementation plan shall reflect reasonable assurances that water quality
standards will be attained in a reasonable period of time. At a minimum, the
following factors shall be considered by Ohio EPA in determining the reasonable
period of time in which water quality standards will be met:
(a)
Receiving water
characteristics.
(b)
Persistence, behavior and ubiquity of pollutants of
concern.
(c)
Type of remediation activities
necessary.
(d)
Available regulatory and non-regulatory
controls.
(e)
Other requirements for attainment of water quality
standards.
(F)
All public
records created in the development of the TMDL shall be made available upon
request in accordance with section
149.43 of the Revised
Code.
Replaces: 3745-2-12