Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 6, September 16, 2024
(a) A
lawyer shall not have sexual relations with a current client of the
lawyer.
(b) Paragraph (a) shall not
apply if a consensual sexual relationship existed between the lawyer and the
client before the legal representation commenced.
(c) A lawyer shall not require or demand
sexual relations with a client incident to or as a condition of any
professional representation.
(d)
For purposes of this rule, "sexual relations" means:
(1) Sexual intercourse; or
(2) Any touching of the sexual or other
intimate parts of a person or causing such person to touch the sexual or other
intimate parts of the lawyer for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the
sexual desire of either party.
(e) For purposes of this rule, "lawyer" means
any lawyer who assists in the representation of the client but does not include
other lawyers in a firm who provide no such assistance.
Comment
[1] Rule
1.7, the general rule on conflict of interest, has always prohibited a lawyer
from representing a client when the lawyer's ability competently to represent
the client may be impaired by the lawyer's other personal or professional
commitments. Under the general rule on conflicts and the rule on prohibited
transactions (Rule 1.8), relationships with clients, whether personal or
financial, that affect a lawyer's ability to exercise his or her independent
professional judgment on behalf of a client are closely scrutinized. The rules
on conflict of interest have always prohibited the representation of a client
if a sexual relationship with the client presents a significant danger to the
lawyer's ability to represent the client adequately. The present rule clarifies
that a sexual relationship with a client is damaging to the client-lawyer
relationship and creates an impermissible conflict of interest that cannot be
ameliorated by the consent of the client.
Exploitation of the Lawyer's Fiduciary Position
[2] The relationship between a
lawyer and client is a fiduciary relationship in which the lawyer occupies the
highest position of trust and confidence. The relationship is also inherently
unequal. The client comes to a lawyer with a problem and puts his or her faith
in the lawyer's special knowledge, skills, and ability to solve the client's
problem. The same factors that led the client to place his or her trust and
reliance in the lawyer also have the potential to place the lawyer in a
position of dominance and the client in a position of vulnerability.
[3] A sexual relationship between a lawyer
and a client may involve unfair exploitation of the lawyer's fiduciary
position. Because of the dependence that so often characterizes the
attorney-client relationship, there is a significant possibility that a sexual
relationship with a client resulted from the exploitation of the lawyer's
dominant position and influence. Moreover, if a lawyer permits the otherwise
benign and even recommended client reliance and trust to become the catalyst
for a sexual relationship with a client, the lawyer violates one of the most
basic ethical obligations; i.e., not to use the trust of the client to the
client's disadvantage. This same principle underlies the rules prohibiting the
use of client confidences to the disadvantage of the client and the rules that
seek to ensure that lawyers do not take financial advantage of their clients.
See Rules 1.6 and 1.8.
Impairment of the Ability to Represent the Client
Competently
[4] A lawyer
must maintain his or her ability to represent a client dispassionately and
without impairment to the exercise of independent professional judgment on
behalf of the client. The existence of a sexual relationship between lawyer and
client, under the circumstances proscribed by this rule, presents a significant
danger that the lawyer's ability to represent the client competently may be
adversely affected because of the lawyer's emotional involvement. This
emotional involvement has the potential to undercut the objective detachment
that is demanded for adequate representation. A sexual relationship also
creates the risk that the lawyer will be subject to a conflict of interest. For
example, a lawyer who is sexually involved with his or her client risks
becoming an adverse witness to his or her own client in a divorce action where
there are issues of adultery and child custody to resolve. Finally, a blurred
line between the professional and personal relationship may make it difficult
to predict to what extent client confidences will be protected by the
attorney-client privilege in the law of evidence since client confidences are
protected by privilege only when they are imparted in the context of the
client-lawyer relationship.
No Prejudice to Client
[5] The prohibition upon representing a
client with whom a sexual relationship develops applies regardless of the
absence of a showing of prejudice to the client and regardless of whether the
relationship is consensual.
Prior Consensual Relationship
[6] Sexual relationships that predate the
client-lawyer relationship are not prohibited. Issues relating to the
exploitation of the fiduciary relationship and client dependency are not
present when the sexual relationship exists prior to the commencement of the
client-lawyer relationship. However, before proceeding with the representation
in these circumstances, the lawyer should be confident that his or her ability
to represent the client competently will not be impaired.
No Imputed Disqualification
[7] The other lawyers in a firm are not
disqualified from representing a client with whom the lawyer has become
intimate. The potential impairment of the lawyer's ability to exercise
independent professional judgment on behalf of the client with whom he or she
is having a sexual relationship is specific to that lawyer's representation of
the client and is unlikely to affect the ability of other members of the firm
to competently and dispassionately represent the client.