Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 6, September 16, 2024
(a) When a
client's capacity to make adequately considered decisions in connection with a
representation is diminished, whether because of minority, mental impairment or
for some other reason, the lawyer shall, as far as reasonably possible,
maintain a normal client-lawyer relationship with the client.
(b) When the lawyer reasonably believes that
the client has diminished capacity, is at risk of substantial physical,
financial or other harm unless action is taken and cannot adequately act in the
client's own interest, the lawyer may take reasonably necessary protective
action, including consulting with individuals or entities that have the ability
to take action to protect the client and, in appropriate cases, seeking the
appointment of a guardian ad litem or guardian.
(c) Information relating to the
representation of a client with diminished capacity is protected by Rule 1.6.
When taking protective action pursuant to paragraph (b), the lawyer is
impliedly authorized under Rule 1.6(a) to reveal information about the client,
but only to the extent reasonably necessary to protect the client's interests.
Comment
[1] The
normal client-lawyer relationship is based on the assumption that the client,
when properly advised and assisted, is capable of making decisions about
important matters. When the client is a minor or suffers from a diminished
mental capacity, however, maintaining the ordinary client-lawyer relationship
may not be possible in all respects. In particular, a severely incapacitated
person may have no power to make legally binding decisions. Nevertheless, a
client with diminished capacity often has the ability to understand, deliberate
upon, and reach conclusions about matters affecting the client's own
well-being. For example, children as young as five or six years of age, and
certainly those of ten or twelve, are regarded as having opinions that are
entitled to weight in legal proceedings concerning their custody. So also, it
is recognized that some persons of advanced age can be quite capable of
handling routine financial matters while needing special legal protection
concerning major transactions.
[2]
The fact that a client suffers a disability does not diminish the lawyer's
obligation to treat the client with attention and respect. Even if the person
has a legal representative, the lawyer should as far as possible accord the
represented person the status of client, particularly in maintaining
communication.
[3] The client may
wish to have family members or other persons participate in discussions with
the lawyer. When necessary to assist in the representation, the presence of
such persons generally does not affect the applicability of the attorney-client
evidentiary privilege. Nevertheless, the lawyer must keep the client's
interests foremost and, except for protective action authorized under paragraph
(b), must to look to the client, and not family members, to make decisions on
the client's behalf.
[4] If a legal
representative has already been appointed for the client, the lawyer should
ordinarily look to the representative for decisions on behalf of the client. In
matters involving a minor, whether the lawyer should look to the parents as
natural guardians may depend on the type of proceeding or matter in which the
lawyer is representing the minor. If the lawyer represents the guardian as
distinct from the ward, and is aware that the guardian is acting adversely to
the ward's interest, the lawyer may have an obligation to prevent or rectify
the guardian's misconduct.
See Rule 1.2(d).
Taking Protective Action
[5] If a lawyer reasonably believes that a
client is at risk of substantial physical, financial or other harm unless
action is taken, and that a normal client-lawyer relationship cannot be
maintained as provided in paragraph (a) because the client lacks sufficient
capacity to communicate or to make adequately considered decisions in
connection with the representation, then paragraph (b) permits the lawyer to
take protective measures deemed necessary. Such measures could include:
consulting with family members, using a reconsideration period to permit
clarification or improvement of circumstances, using voluntary surrogate
decision-making tools such as durable powers of attorney or consulting with
support groups, professional services, adult-protective agencies or other
individuals or entities that have the ability to protect the client. In taking
any protective action, the lawyer should be guided by such factors as the
wishes and values of the client to the extent known, the client's best
interests and the goals of intruding into the client's decision-making autonomy
to the least extent feasible, maximizing client capacities and respecting the
client's family and social connections.
[6] In determining the extent of the client's
diminished capacity, the lawyer should consider and balance such factors as:
the client's ability to articulate reasoning leading to a decision, variability
of state of mind and ability to appreciate consequences of a decision; the
substantive fairness of a decision; and the consistency of a decision with the
known long-term commitments and values of the client. In appropriate
circumstances, the lawyer may seek guidance from an appropriate
diagnostician.
[7] If a legal
representative has not been appointed, the lawyer should consider whether
appointment of a guardian ad litem or guardian is necessary to protect the
client's interests. Thus, if a client with diminished capacity has substantial
property that should be sold for the client's benefit, effective completion of
the transaction may require appointment of a legal representative. In addition,
rules of procedure in litigation sometimes provide that minors or persons with
diminished capacity must be represented by a guardian or next friend if they do
not have a general guardian. In many circumstances, however, appointment of a
legal representative may be more expensive or traumatic for the client than
circumstances in fact require. Evaluation of such circumstances is a matter
entrusted to the professional judgment of the lawyer. In considering
alternatives, however, the lawyer should be aware of any law that requires the
lawyer to advocate the least restrictive action on behalf of the client.
Disclosure of the Client's Condition
[8] Disclosure of the client's diminished
capacity could adversely affect the client's interests. For example, raising
the question of diminished capacity could, in some circumstances, lead to
proceedings for involuntary commitment. Information relating to the
representation is protected by Rule 1.6. Therefore, unless authorized to do so,
the lawyer may not disclose such information. When taking protective action
pursuant to paragraph (b), the lawyer is impliedly authorized to make the
necessary disclosures, even when the client directs the lawyer to the contrary.
Nevertheless, given the risks of disclosure, paragraph (c) limits what the
lawyer may disclose in consulting with other individuals or entities or seeking
the appointment of a legal representative. At the very least, the lawyer should
determine whether it is likely that the person or entity consulted with will
act adversely to the client's interests before discussing matters related to
the client. The lawyer's position in such cases is an unavoidably difficult
one.
Emergency Legal Assistance
[9] In an emergency where the health, safety
or a financial interest of a person with seriously diminished capacity is
threatened with imminent and irreparable harm, a lawyer may take legal action
on behalf of such a person even though the person is unable to establish a
client-lawyer relationship or to make or express considered judgments about the
matter, when the person or another acting in good faith on that person's behalf
has consulted with the lawyer. Even in such an emergency, however, the lawyer
should not act unless the lawyer reasonably believes that the person has no
other lawyer, agent or other representative available. The lawyer should take
legal action on behalf of the person only to the extent reasonably necessary to
maintain the status quo or otherwise avoid imminent and irreparable harm. A
lawyer who undertakes to represent a person in such an exigent situation has
the same duties under these Rules as the lawyer would with respect to a client.
[10] A lawyer who acts on behalf
of a person with seriously diminished capacity in an emergency should keep the
confidences of the person as if dealing with a client, disclosing them only to
the extent necessary to accomplish the intended protective action. The lawyer
should disclose to any tribunal involved and to any other counsel involved the
nature of his or her relationship with the person. The lawyer should take steps
to regularize the relationship or implement other protective solutions as soon
as possible.