Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 6, September 16, 2024
(a) A lawyer shall not make an agreement for,
charge, or collect an illegal or clearly excessive fee or charge or collect a
clearly excessive amount for expenses. The factors to be considered in
determining whether a fee is clearly excessive include the following:
(1) the time and labor required, the novelty
and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform
the legal service properly;
(2) the
likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular
employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer;
(3) the fee customarily charged in the
locality for similar legal services;
(4) the amount involved and the results
obtained;
(5) the time limitations
imposed by the client or by the circumstances;
(6) the nature and length of the professional
relationship with the client;
(7)
the experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the
services; and
(8) whether the fee
is fixed or contingent.
(b) When the lawyer has not regularly
represented the client, the scope of the representation and the basis or rate
of the fee and expenses for which the client will be responsible shall be
communicated to the client, preferably in writing, before or within a
reasonable time after commencing the representation.
(c) A fee may be contingent on the outcome of
the matter for which the service is rendered, except in a matter in which a
contingent fee is prohibited by paragraph (d) or other law. A contingent fee
agreement shall be in a writing signed by the client and shall state the method
by which the fee is to be determined, including the percentage or percentages
that shall accrue to the lawyer in the event of settlement, trial or appeal;
litigation and other expenses to be deducted from the recovery; and whether
such expenses are to be deducted before or after the contingent fee is
calculated. The agreement must clearly notify the client of any expenses for
which the client will be liable whether or not the client is the prevailing
party. Upon conclusion of a contingent fee matter, the lawyer shall provide the
client with a written statement stating the outcome of the matter and, if there
is a recovery, showing the remittance to the client and the method of its
determination.
(d) A lawyer shall
not enter into an arrangement for, charge, or collect:
(1) a contingent fee for representing a
defendant in a criminal case; however, a lawyer may charge and collect a
contingent fee for representation in a criminal or civil asset forfeiture
proceeding if not otherwise prohibited by law; or
(2) a contingent fee in a civil case in which
such a fee is prohibited by law.
(e) A division of a fee between lawyers who
are not in the same firm may be made only if:
(1) the division is in proportion to the
services performed by each lawyer or each lawyer assumes joint responsibility
for the representation;
(2) the
client agrees to the arrangement, including the share each lawyer will receive,
and the agreement is confirmed in writing; and
(3) the total fee is reasonable.
(f) Any lawyer having a dispute
with a client regarding a fee for legal services must:
(1) make reasonable efforts to advise his or
her client of the existence of the North Carolina State Bar's program of fee
dispute resolution at least 30 days prior to initiating legal proceedings to
collect the disputed fee; and
(2)
participate in good faith in the fee dispute resolution process if the client
submits a proper request.
(g) A lawyer shall not enter into an
arrangement for, charge, or collect anything of value for responding to an
inquiry by a disciplinary authority regarding allegations of professional
misconduct by the lawyer, for responding to a Client Security Fund claim
alleging wrongful conduct by the lawyer, or for responding to and participating
in the resolution of a petition for resolution of a disputed fee filed against
the lawyer.
COMMENT
Appropriate Fees and Expenses
[1] Paragraph (a) requires that lawyers
charge fees that are not clearly excessive under the circumstances. The factors
specified in (1) through (8) are not exclusive. Nor will each factor be
relevant in each instance. Paragraph (a) also requires that expenses for which
the client will be charged must not be clearly excessive. A lawyer may seek
reimbursement for expenses for in-house services, such as copying, or for other
expenses incurred in-house, such as telephone charges, either by charging a
reasonable amount to which the client has agreed in advance or by charging an
amount that reasonably reflects the cost incurred by the lawyer.
Basis or Rate of Fee
[2] When the lawyer has regularly represented
a client, an understanding will have ordinarily evolved concerning the basis or
rate of the fee and the expenses for which the client will be responsible. In a
new client-lawyer relationship, however, a written understanding as to fees and
expenses should be promptly established. Generally, furnishing the client with
a simple memorandum or copy of the lawyer's customary fee arrangements will
suffice, provided that the writing states the general nature of the legal
services to be provided, the basis, rate or total amount of the fee and whether
and to what extent the client will be responsible for any costs, expenses or
disbursements in the course of the representation. A written statement
concerning the terms of the engagement reduces the possibility of
misunderstanding.
[3] Contingent
fees, like any other fees, are subject to the standard of paragraph (a) of this
Rule. In determining whether a particular contingent fee is clearly excessive,
or whether it is reasonable to charge any form of contingent fee, a lawyer must
consider the factors that are relevant under the circumstances. Applicable law
may impose limitations on contingent fees, such as a ceiling on the percentage
allowable, or may require a lawyer to offer clients an alternative basis for
the fee. Applicable law also may apply to situations other than a contingent
fee, for example, government regulations regarding fees in certain tax matters.
Terms of Payment
[4] A lawyer may require advance payment of a
fee, but is obliged to return any unearned portion. See Rule 1.16(d). This does
not apply when the advance payment is a true retainer to reserve services
rather than an advance to secure the payment of fees yet to be earned. A lawyer
may accept property in payment for services, such as an ownership interest in
an enterprise, provided this does not involve acquisition of a proprietary
interest in the cause of action or subject matter of the litigation contrary to
Rule 1.8 (i). However, a fee paid in property instead of money may be subject
to the requirements of Rule 1.8(a) because such fees often have the essential
qualities of a business transaction with the client.
[5] Once a fee agreement has been reached
between attorney and client, the attorney has an ethical obligation to fulfill
the contract and represent the client's best interests regardless of whether
the lawyer has struck an unfavorable bargain. An attorney may seek to
renegotiate the fee agreement in light of changed circumstances or for other
good cause, but the attorney may not abandon or threaten to abandon the client
to cut the attorney's losses or to coerce an additional or higher fee. Any fee
contract made or remade during the existence of the attorney-client
relationship must be reasonable and freely and fairly made by the client having
full knowledge of all material circumstances incident to the agreement. If a
dispute later arises concerning the fee, the burden of proving reasonableness
and fairness will be upon the lawyer.
[6] An agreement may not be made whose terms
might induce the lawyer improperly to curtail services for the client or
perform them in a way contrary to the client's interest. For example, a lawyer
should not enter into an agreement whereby services are to be provided only up
to a stated amount when it is foreseeable that more extensive services probably
will be required, unless the situation is adequately explained to the client.
Otherwise, the client might have to bargain for further assistance in the midst
of a proceeding or transaction. However, it is proper to define the extent of
services in light of the client's ability to pay. A lawyer should not exploit a
fee arrangement based primarily on hourly charges by using wasteful procedures.
Prohibited Contingent Fees
[7] Paragraph (d) prohibits a lawyer from
charging a contingent fee in a domestic relations matter when payment is
contingent upon the securing of a divorce or upon the amount of alimony or
support to be obtained. This provision does not preclude a contract for a
contingent fee for legal representation in connection with the recovery of
post-judgment balances due under support, alimony or other financial orders
because such contracts do not implicate the same policy concerns.
Division of Fee
[8] A division of fee is a single billing to
a client covering the fee of two or more lawyers who are not in the same firm.
A division of fee facilitates association of more than one lawyer in a matter
in which neither alone could serve the client as well, and most often is used
when the fee is contingent and the division is between a referring lawyer and a
trial specialist. Paragraph (e) permits the lawyers to divide a fee either on
the basis of the proportion of services they render or if each lawyer assumes
responsibility for the representation as a whole. In addition, the client must
agree to the arrangement, including the share that each lawyer is to receive,
and the agreement must be confirmed in writing. A lawyer may divide a fee with
an out-of-state lawyer who refers a matter to the lawyer if the conditions of
paragraph (e) are satisfied. Contingent fee agreements must be in a writing
signed by the client and must otherwise comply with paragraph (c) of this Rule.
Joint responsibility for the representation entails financial and ethical
responsibility for the representation as if the lawyers were associated in a
partnership. A lawyer should only refer a matter to a lawyer whom the referring
lawyer reasonably believes is competent to handle the matter. See Rule
1.1.
[9] Paragraph (e) does not
prohibit or regulate division of fees to be received in the future for work
done when lawyers were previously associated in a law firm.
Disputes over Fees
[10] Participation in the fee dispute
resolution program of the North Carolina State Bar is mandatory when a client
requests resolution of a disputed fee. Before filing an action to collect a
disputed fee, the client must be advised of the fee dispute resolution program.
Notification must occur not only when there is a specific issue in dispute, but
also when the client simply fails to pay. However, when the client expressly
acknowledges liability for the specific amount of the bill and states that he
or she cannot presently pay the bill, the fee is not disputed and notification
of the client is not required. In making reasonable efforts to advise the
client of the existence of the fee dispute resolution program, it is preferable
to address a written communication to the client at the client's last known
address. If the address of the client is unknown, the lawyer should use
reasonable efforts to acquire the current address of the client. Notification
is not required in those instances where the State Bar does not have
jurisdiction over the fee dispute as set forth in 27 N.C.A.C. 1D,
.0702.
[11] If fee dispute
resolution is requested by a client, the lawyer must participate in the
resolution process in good faith. The State Bar program of fee dispute
resolution uses mediation to resolve fee disputes as an alternative to
litigation. The lawyer must cooperate with the person who is charged with
investigating the dispute and with the person(s) appointed to mediate the
dispute. Further information on the fee dispute resolution program can be found
at 27 N.C.A.C. 1D, .0700, et. seq. The lawyer should fully set forth his or her
position and support that position by appropriate documentation.
[12] A lawyer may petition a tribunal for a
legal fee if allowed by applicable law or, subject to the requirements for fee
dispute resolution set forth in Rule 1.5(f), may bring an action against a
client to collect a fee. The tribunal's determination of the merit of the
petition or the claim is reached by an application of law to fact and not by
the application of this Rule. Therefore, a tribunal's reduction or denial of a
petition or claim for a fee is not evidence that the fee request violates this
Rule and is not admissible in a disciplinary proceeding brought under this
Rule.
[13] Lawyers have a
professional obligation to respond to inquiries by disciplinary authorities
regarding allegations of their own professional misconduct, to respond to
Client Security Fund claims alleging wrongful conduct by the lawyer, and to
respond to and participate in good faith in the fee dispute resolution process.
It is improper for a lawyer to charge a client for the time expended on these
professional obligations because they are not legal services that a lawyer
provides to a client, but rather they advance the interests of the public and
the profession.