Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 6, September 16, 2024
(a) In
order to prevent fraud, county department of social services shall be
responsible for fraud prevention as follows:
(1) Develop an operational program for fraud
prevention, detection, and investigation. Requirements shall be based on the
following:
(A) the number of
recipients;
(B) the effectiveness
of the fraud prevention program;
(C) the frequency of suspected fraud cases,
and cases; and
(D) the resources
available to the agency.
(2) Designate staff to be responsible for
fraud prevention, detection, and investigation.
(3) The recipient shall be notified of the
county's intent to recover the payment no less frequently than at each
eligibility review of his or her obligation to report within 10 days, all
changes in income, resources, or other changes which may affect the amount of
payment. Failure to do so within that time may constitute a willful withholding
of such information, and permit the county department of social services to
recover the overpayment.
(b) In order to detect and investigate fraud,
county department of social services shall be responsible for detection and
investigation as follows:
(1) Investigate any
information which indicates that a recipient may be receiving Work First to
which the recipient is not entitled.
(2) In the investigation the staff designated
for fraud shall:
(A) verify that all
responsibilities have been fulfilled as set forth in the rules governing the
Work First program;
(B) determine
whether further investigation should be undertaken to support the belief that
fraud is suspected;
(C) evaluate
the evidence to substantiate fraud and the intent to defraud; and
(D) determine the amount of the erroneous
payment.
(3) When there
is reason to suspect fraud, the county department of social services director
must ensure that the agency has explained to the recipient responsibilities for
reporting any change in their circumstances to the agency. The director shall
determine whether the agency should investigate further and shall present the
case and fraud summary to the county board of social services for action unless
the board has delegated this responsibility to the Director.
(4) The fraud summary shall include:
(A) identifying information;
(B) a description of the fraudulent
act;
(C) evidence to substantiate
fraud and the intent to defraud;
(D) evidence to substantiate the amount of
ineligible assistance received; and
(E) information concerning the recipient's
competency, educational background, ability to know right from wrong, any
statement volunteered by the recipient in response to the accusation and any
other information which may help explain the recipient's current
situation.
(c) In order to determine if fraud is
suspected, county board of social services shall be responsible for the
following:
(1) The county board of social
services, or its designee, shall determine whether there is a basis for the
belief that misrepresentation may have been committed by a person.
(2) The county board, or its designee, shall
determine if the person:
(A) willfully and
knowingly misstated, provided incorrect or misleading information in response
to either oral or written questions;
(B) willfully and knowingly failed to report
changes which might have affected the amount of payment; or
(C) willfully and knowingly failed to report
the receipt of benefits which the person knew they were not entitled to
receive.
(3) There must
be physical evidence to substantiate a determination that fraud was the reason
for the overpayment.
(4) If the
board, or its designee, determines fraud is suspected, it shall instruct the
agency to pursue one or more, of the following actions:
(A) Seek administrative recoupment which is
defined as:
(i) involuntary reduction of Work
First grant may be collected from all income and assets of the assistance unit.
The assistance unit shall retain an amount not less than 90 percent of the
assistance payment received by a family of similar composition with no other
income;
(ii) a voluntary grant
reduction. There is no limitation on the amount of the reduction;
(iii) voluntary recipient refund. There is no
limitation on the amount of the refund;
(iv) NC Debt Setoff Collection. NC Debt
Set-off (Tax Intercept) is the process by which the North Carolina Department
of Health and Human Services (DHHS) intercepts income tax refunds through the
North Carolina Department of Revenue (DOR) to repay Intentional Program
Violation (IPV) and Inadvertent Household Error (IHE) Claims of current/former
Work First recipients.
(B) An administrative disqualification
hearing or referral for prosecution shall be initiated by the county department
of social services.
(i) The county department
of social services shall initiate a hearing as follows:
(I) Evidence indicates that an individual has
intentionally violated a program rule in order to receive cash assistance for
which the individual is not eligible. The hearing shall be held and any
administrative action initiated within 90 days of the date the individual is
notified in writing that the hearing has been scheduled. No hearing shall be
held when the amount of the overpayment is less than one hundred dollars
($100.00).
(II) The county board of
social services shall designate the county director or their impartial county
employee to act as the hearings officer. Duties are to: provide written
notification of the hearing date, time, and location to the individual at least
30 days in advance of the date of the hearing. Written notification of the
hearing shall include the individual's right to have legal representation, a
witness or witnesses, or waive the hearing; conduct the hearing to collect all
evidence and testimony; render a written decision to the individual and DSS
within 15 days as to whether an intentional program violation has occurred.
Written notification that the hearing decision will be mailed by Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested. The notice shall inform the individual of the right
to further appeal to the State (or higher local authority) and the procedures
for such appeal. When an intentional program violation is found, the
notification will inform the individual of the length of the sanction and that
individual remains a part of the Work First case and subject to program
requirements. When no intentional program violation is found, the notification
shall inform the individual that the overpayment shall be collected pursuant to
this Subchapter.
(ii)
The county department of social services shall sanction.
(I) Apply disqualification sanctions as
follows: 12 months of ineligibility for the first offense; 24 months for the
second offense; and permanently disqualified for the third offense.
(II) The sanction shall be applied by
reducing Work First cash assistance payment by the disqualified person's share
of the payment for the period of sanction. The disqualified person remains a
part of the Work First case.
(iii) The county department of social
services will follow procedures pursuant to Part (c)(4)(A) of this Rule in the
collection of overpayments.
(C) civil court action; or
(D) criminal court action.
(d) The county board of
social services shall follow up with the State Division of Social Services as
follows:
(1) If the board, or its designee,
suspects fraud, the department's findings and actions shall be reported to the
State Division of Social Services. The county department of social services
director shall keep the county board of social services and State Division of
Social Services informed on all cases referred for court and repayment
action.
(2) The county department
of social services shall support the local prosecutor by accomplishing
interviews in accordance with the prosecutor's requirements, recommending
possible witnesses, providing investigative reports, and taking other action
deemed necessary by legal authorities.
(3) Regardless of what action is taken by the
board or the court, the county shall continue to work with the individual and
shall notify the individual of the action taken in their case.
(4) The county shall maintain records on the
number of cases referred for investigation, the number of suspected fraud
referrals, action taken to recover the overpayment and amounts
recovered.
(e) In fraud
cases, if a county fails to act promptly on indications of ineligibility,
federal and state financial participation shall not be available.
Authority
G.S.
108A-27;
108A-39;
108A-79;
143B-153;
45 C.F.R.
235.110;
Eff. February 1,
1984;
Amended Eff. June 1, 1990; February 1, 1986;
Temporary Amendment Eff. June 17, 1998;
Amended Eff. April 1,
1999;
Readopted Eff. October 1,
2021.