Current through Register Vol. 46, No. 39, September 25, 2024
(a)
Application. This section shall apply when related actions are pending in the
courts of the Unified Court System in more than one judicial district and it
may be appropriate for these actions to be coordinated pursuant to the criteria
and procedures set forth in this section. Coordination pursuant to this section
shall apply to pretrial proceedings, including dispositive motions.
(b) Litigation coordinating panel.
(1) Composition. The Chief Administrator of
the Courts, in consultation with the Presiding Justice of each Appellate
Division, shall create a Litigation Coordinating Panel composed of one justice
of the Supreme Court from each judicial department of the State.
(2) Procedure. The panel shall determine, sua
sponte or upon application of a party to an action, a justice before whom such
an action is pending, or an administrative judge, whether the related actions
should be coordinated before one or more individual justices. The panel shall
provide notice and an opportunity to be heard to all parties to the actions
sought to be coordinated and shall inform the justices before whom such actions
are pending of the initiation of proceedings before the panel.
(3) Standards for coordination. In
determining whether to issue an administrative order of coordination, the panel
shall consider, among other things, the complexity of the actions; whether
common questions of fact or law exist, and the importance of such questions to
the determination of the issues; the risk that coordination may unreasonably
delay the progress, increase the expense, or complicate the processing of any
action or otherwise prejudice a party; the risk of duplicative or inconsistent
rulings, orders or judgments; the convenience of the parties, witnesses and
counsel; whether coordinated discovery would be advantageous; efficient
utilization of judicial resources and the facilities and personnel of the
court; the manageability of a coordinated litigation; whether issues of
insurance, limits on assets and potential bankruptcy can be best addressed in
coordinated proceedings; and the pendency of related matters in the Federal
courts and in the courts of other states. The panel may exclude particular
actions from an otherwise applicable order of coordination when necessary to
protect the rights of parties.
(4)
Determination.
(i) The panel shall issue a
written decision on each application. If the panel determines to direct
coordination, it shall issue an administrative order identifying the actions
that shall be coordinated. The order may address actions subsequently filed or
not otherwise then before the panel.
(ii) The order of the panel, following
consultation with the Chief Administrative Judge, shall specify the number of
Coordinating Justices and the county or counties in which the coordinated
proceedings shall take place. In making this decision, the panel shall
consider, among other things, the venues of origin of the cases to be
coordinated; whether the actions arise out of an accident or events in a
particular county; judicial caseloads in prospective venues; fairness to
parties; the convenience of the parties and witnesses; the convenience of
counsel; and whether the purposes of this section can best be advanced by
coordination before more than one Coordinating Justice.
(c) Coordinating Justice.
(1) Designation. The Administrative Judge
charged with supervision of the local jurisdiction within which coordinated
proceedings are to take place shall select the Coordinating Justice or
Justices, in consultation with the appropriate Deputy Chief Administrative
Judge and with the approval of the appropriate Presiding Justice. In deciding
whom to designate, the Administrative Judge shall consider, among other things,
the existing caseload of each prospective appointee and the overall needs of
the court in which that justice serves; the familiarity of that justice with
the litigation at issue; the justice's managerial ability; and the previous
experience of the justice with the field of law involved and with coordinated
litigation. The Administrative Judge may designate a justice from another local
jurisdiction as a Coordinating Justice with the approval of the Administrative
Judge thereof and the appropriate Presiding Justice.
(2) Authority. The Coordinating Justice shall
have authority to make any order consistent with this section and its purposes,
including to remand to the court of origin any portion of a case not properly
subject to coordination under the administrative order of the panel; assign a
master caption; create a central case file and docket; establish a service
list; periodically issue case management orders after consultation with
counsel; appoint and define the roles of steering committees and counsel of
parties and liaison counsel, provided that the committees and counsel shall not
deprive any party of substantive rights; issue protective orders pursuant to
article 31 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules; establish a document
depository; direct the parties to prepare coordinated pleadings and deem
service upon liaison counsel or steering committee service upon the respective
parties; require service of uniform requests for disclosure and establish a
uniform method for the conduct of physical and mental examination; rule upon
all motions; require the parties to participate in settlement discussions and
court-annexed alternative dispute resolution; and try any part of any
coordinated case on consent of the parties to that action.
(3) Coordination with Federal or other
states' actions. If actions related to those pending before a Coordinating
Justice are proceeding in Federal courts or in the courts of other states, the
Coordinating Justice shall consult with the presiding judge(s) in an effort to
advance the purposes of this section. Where appropriate, the Coordinating
Justice, while respecting the rights of parties under the Civil Practice Law
and Rules, may require that discovery in the cases coordinated pursuant to this
section proceed jointly or in coordination with discovery in the Federal or
other states' actions.
(d) Termination of coordination. The
Coordinating Justice, sua sponte or upon motion by any party, may terminate
coordination, in whole or in part, if the Justice determines that coordination
has been completed or that the purposes of this section can be best advanced by
termination of the coordination. Upon termination, the actions shall be
remanded to their counties of origin for trial unless the parties to an action
consent to trial of that action before the Coordinating Justice.