Current through Register Vol. 46, No. 39, September 25, 2024
Between April 1, 2013 and May 31, 2014, the requirements of
this section are not effective with regard to behavior support plans which have
been developed in accordance with section
633.16
of this Part and with regard to informed consent that has been obtained in
accordance with section
633.16
of this Part. On April 1, 2013, requirements concerning the specially
constituted committee are no longer effective. The requirements of this section
are no longer in effect on or after May 31, 2014.
(Please note that this section is presented in a principles
of compliance [see glossary, section
681.99 of
this Part] and standards of certification [see glossary, section
681.99 of
this Part] format.)
(a)
Principles of compliance.
(1)
Principles of compliance represent those requirements with which an
agency/facility must comply, but against which the agency/facility will not be
routinely surveyed for recertification purposes. However, evidence of failure
to comply with the principles may be the basis for decertification in
accordance with article 16 of the Mental Hygiene Law.
(2) No service plan (see glossary, section
681.99 of
this Part) which involves an untoward risk to an individual's protection or
rights, including those designed to manage inappropriate behavior and inclusive
of those employing medication for such purposes, shall be implemented until
informed consent is obtained in conformance with this section.
(3) Nothing in this section shall be deemed
to limit the availability of medical, dental, health, and hospital services,
which may be rendered to an individual of any age without seeking informed
consent when, in the physician's judgment, an emergency exists creating an
immediate need for attention.
(4)
Nothing in this section shall be deemed to limit the necessity for informed
consent for professional medical treatment as required by section
633.11 of this
Title.
(5) Determining whether a
service plan constitutes an untoward risk to an individual's protection or
rights (see glossary, section
681.99 of
this Part), and committee approval of such plans:
(i) An individual's interdisciplinary team
shall review each service plan developed to determine whether the proposed plan
constitutes an untoward risk to the individual's protection and
rights.
(ii) If an
interdisciplinary team considers that a proposed service plan constitutes an
untoward risk to an individual's protection or rights, the plan shall be
referred to the specially constituted committee charged with the responsibility
for reviewing programs that may involve untoward risks to an individual's
protection or rights pursuant to the provisions of
42 CFR
483.440(f)(3).
(iii) The specially constituted committee,
upon receipt of a service plan referred to it from an interdisciplinary team,
shall determine whether or not the service plan constitutes an untoward risk to
an individual's protection or rights.
(iv) If the specially constituted committee
determines that a service plan constitutes an untoward risk to an individual's
protection or rights, it shall approve or disapprove the implementation of the
plan and, if approved, ensure that the requirements of this Part are
met.
(6) Role of the
facility when obtaining informed consent for a proposed service plan that
constitutes an untoward risk to an individual's protection or rights:
(i) The administrator shall ensure the
obtaining of written informed consent by or on behalf of an individual whose
service plan is under consideration. As it is the intent of this section to
ensure an individual's participation in granting or withholding informed
consent for any service plan affecting him or her, it is, therefore, necessary
to ensure that the presentation to the individual be in terms and a manner that
will most easily facilitate understanding by that individual.
(a) In every case it shall be the duty of the
administrator to ensure that the individual is personally afforded an
appropriate explanation of the proposed service plan.
(b) If an individual with the ability to give
consent (see glossary, section
681.99 of
this Part), gives his or her informed consent, and does not object, one of the
following parties, in the order of priority stated, shall be informed of the
proposed service plan before implementation:
(1) an individual's actively involved (see
glossary, section
681.99 of
this Part) adult spouse;
(2) an
individual's actively involved parent;
(3) an individual's actively involved adult
child;
(4) an individual's actively
involved adult family member (see glossary, section
681.99 of
this Part); and
(5) the consumer
advisory board for the Willowbrook class (for a class member only).
(c) The party receiving notice as
listed above shall be informed of the right to appeal service plan decisions
pursuant to section
633.12
of this Title.
(ii)
Obtaining informed consent for service plans that constitute an untoward risk
to an individual's protection and rights if the individual is less than 18
years of age:
(a) Consent shall be sought
from the parties listed below, in the order stated:
(1) an individual's court appointed guardian
(see glossary, section
681.99 of
this Part);
(2) a married
individual with the ability to give consent;
(3) an individual's actively involved adult
spouse;
(4) an individual's
actively involved parent;
(5) an
individual's actively involved adult family member;
(6) the consumer advisory board for the
Willowbrook class (for a class member only); and
(7) a consent committee pursuant to paragraph
(10) of this subdivision.
(b) When a married individual has been
determined to lack the ability to consent but the first available party on the
above list disagrees with that determination, and the agency/facility considers
implementation in the best interest of the individual, the plan shall only be
implemented after application to a court of competent jurisdiction; notice of
such application shall be given to the party who disagreed with the
determination.
(c) If the first
available party on this list objects to the proposed service plan, and the
agency/facility considers implementation to be in the best interest of the
individual, application shall be made to a court of competent jurisdiction;
notice of such application shall be given to the objecting party.
(d) If no party is available and the
agency/facility considers implementation of the service plan to be in the best
interest of the individual, application shall be made to a court of competent
jurisdiction.
(e) If a party or
parties on the list is either unwilling to consent to or object to the proposed
service plan, application may be made to subsequent parties on the list; if no
party is willing to give consent and the agency/facility considers
implementation to be in the best interest of the individual, application shall
be made to a court of competent jurisdiction.
(iii) Obtaining informed consent for service
plans that constitute an untoward risk to an individual's protection and rights
if an individual is 18 years of age or older and has the ability to understand
appropriate disclosures regarding a proposed service plan:
(a) Such service plan shall be initiated only
with the individual's informed consent.
(b) In the absence of a determination to the
contrary (e.g., appointment of a guardian, or a determination
in accordance with paragraph [8] of this subdivision), it shall be presumed
that the individual has the ability to understand appropriate disclosure
regarding the proposed treatment.
(c) If an individual should object at any
time to the administration of medication as part of a behavior management plan,
regardless of his or her ability to give informed consent, the provisions of
paragraph (9) of this subdivision shall apply.
(iv) Obtaining informed consent for service
plans that constitute an untoward risk to an individual's protection and right
if an individual is 18 years of age or older and a determination of
insufficient capacity has been made by a court of competent jurisdiction:
(a) Consent shall be secured pursuant to the
terms of the order of said court.
(b) If a legal guardian has been appointed
pursuant to section 17-A of the Surrogate's Court Procedure Act, consent shall
be sought from said guardian except as provided for in subparagraph (10)(ii) of
this subdivision.
(v)
Obtaining informed consent for service plans that constitute an untoward risk
to and individual's protection and rights if an individual is 18 years of age
or older and a determination of insufficient ability to give informed consent
has been made pursuant to paragraph (8) of this subdivision.
(a) Consent shall be sought from the parties
listed below, in the order stated:
(1) an
individual's actively involved adult spouse;
(2) an individual's actively involved adult
child;
(3) an individual's actively
involved parent;
(4) an
individual's actively involved adult family member;
(5) the consumer advisory board for the
Willowbrook class (for a class member only); and
(6) a consent committee pursuant to paragraph
(10) of this subdivision.
(b) When an individual has been determined to
lack the ability to consent, but the first party on the above list disagrees
with that determination, and the agency/facility considers implementation in
the best interest of the individual, the plan shall only be implemented after
application to a court of competent jurisdiction; notice of such application
shall be given to the party who disagreed with the determination.
(c) If the first available party on this list
objects to the proposed service plan, and the agency/facility considers
implementation to be in the best interest of the individual, application shall
be made to a court of competent jurisdiction; notice of such application shall
be given to the objecting party.
(d) If no party is available and the
agency/facility considers implementation of the service plan to be in the best
interest of the individual, application shall be made to a court of competent
jurisdiction.
(e) If a party or
parties on this list is either unwilling to consent to or object to the
proposed service plan, application may be made to subsequent parties on the
list; if no party is willing to give consent and the agency/facility considers
implementation to be in the best interest of the individual, application shall
be made to a court of competent jurisdiction.
(vi) The administrator shall furnish an
individual, and/or other parties, committee, or court reviewing an individual's
ability to understand treatment and considering consent thereto, with all
necessary information, including medical risks, benefits, and alternatives to a
proposed service plan.
(vii)
Documentation of consent shall be included in an individual's record.
(viii) Whenever consent is sought from other
than an authorized guardian or the parents of a minor (see glossary, section
681.99 of
this Part), for individual's who are residents of a developmental center or
those on conditional release from a developmental center, the Mental Hygiene
Legal Service shall be notified.
(7) Role of the individual, party, or
committee giving consent.
(i) When an
actively involved spouse, actively involved parent, actively involved adult
child, actively involved adult family member, the consumer advisory board for
the Willowbrook class (for class members only), or a consent committee reviews
a request to give informed consent, the party or committee:
(a) shall review the ability of the
individual to understand appropriate disclosures regarding the proposed service
plan and, if appropriate, a range of related alternative treatment approaches;
as well as the individual's ability to give or withhold consent thereto;
(1) may seek the services of an outside
consultant to advise them on the individual's ability to give informed consent;
and
(2) if such party or committee
disagrees with a determination that an individual lacks the ability to give
informed consent, no further action shall be taken until application is made to
a court of competent jurisdiction; notice of such application shall be given to
the party or committee who disagreed with the determination;
(b) shall, to the extent
practicable, discuss a proposed service plan with the individual;
(c) shall, to the extent practicable, ensure
that the individual's opinions, beliefs, and wishes are represented in the
decision to consent or object to the proposed service plan; and
(d) shall consent to the proposed service
plan only if the individual lacks the ability to give or withhold consent and
the proposed service plan is determined to be in the individual's best
interest.
(ii) When a
court appointed guardian reviews a request to give informed consent, the
guardian shall:
(a) to the extent
practicable, discuss a proposed plan with the individual;
(b) to the extent practicable, ensure that
the individual's opinions, beliefs, and wishes are represented in the
guardian's decision to consent or object to the proposed service plan;
and
(c) consent to the proposed
service plan only if it is determined to be in the individual's best
interest.
(iii) The
individual, court appointed guardian, party or committee giving consent shall,
based on the information provided by the interdisciplinary team, indicate the
duration of the consent.
(a) Duration of
consent shall not exceed one year from the date of decision.
(b) Any change to a service plan beyond the
designated span of adjustments, or the development of a new service plan (even
one using those proposed for consideration on a contingent basis) requires the
informed consent of the appropriate party.
(iv) Consent may be withdrawn by an
individual, court appointed guardian, party, or committee giving it, at
anytime, in writing. Consent may be withdrawn by an individual in the same
manner as originally given. Such withdrawal of consent shall be included in the
individual's record.
(8)
Determination of ability to give informed consent for individual's who do not
have a guardian appointed pursuant to section 17-A of the Surrogate's Court
Procedure Act.
(i) Given the complexity and
interrelated elements when determining an individual's ability to understand
his or her treatment and give informed consent thereto, the interdisciplinary
team may prepare a plan with a span of interventions, with specific
limitations, should adjustment be necessary. It may also present, for
consideration on a contingent basis, a range of related treatment approaches.
However, all such interventions and/or related treatment approaches shall have
been described to the individual in terms and manner that would be most easily
understood.
(ii) In those instances
when an individual's interdisciplinary team considers, beyond any reasonable
doubt, that the individual does not have the ability to give informed consent:
(a) The team, through its member having
coordination responsibility, shall enter a written opinion and detailed
analysis as to why it considers the individual to be unable to provide informed
consent.
(b) The opinion and
analysis of the team shall be reviewed by a New York State licensed
psychologist, or a New York State licensed physician who is board certified or
eligible to be certified as a psychiatrist, who is not a member of the
individual's interdisciplinary team, and who may or may not be an employee of
the agency/facility. Such professional shall review the material provided and,
in writing, provide an opinion as to whether the individual has the ability to
give informed consent. If the professional disagrees with the team, the
requirements of subparagraph (iii) of this paragraph shall be
followed.
(iii) If it is
not clear to the interdisciplinary team that an individual does not have the
ability to give informed consent, it shall be the responsibility of the
administrator to comply with the requirements listed below. The administrator
shall:
(a) obtain from the individual's
interdisciplinary team, its written opinion and analysis of the individual's
ability to understand the proposed service plan, and of the individual's
ability to give or withhold informed consent thereto;
(b) obtain from a New York State licensed
psychologist, or New York State licensed physician who is board certified or
eligible for certification as a psychiatrist, a written opinion and analysis of
the individual's ability to understand the proposed service plan, and of the
individual's ability to give inform consent thereto. Said professional shall
not have any ownership, employment relationship, or other interest in the
agency/facility which would compromise his or her objectivity in
decisionmaking;
(c) after
considering the opinion of the interdisciplinary team and the psychologist or
psychiatrist, determine whether it is appropriate to obtain consent from a
party duly recognized by this section, and whether to proceed in accordance
with the other provisions of this section; and
(d) ensure that the opinions of the
interdisciplinary team and the psychologist or psychiatrist, and the decision
of the administrator, are documented in the individual's record and
communicated to that individual and to his or her actively involved adult
spouse, parent, adult child, or adult family member; unless the individual is
an adult who has been determined to have the ability to give informed consent,
objects to such notice being made.
(iv) The administrator shall ensure that
these procedures for determining ability to give informed consent are also
followed whenever:
(a) there is a significant
departure from the material considered in relation to determining an
individual's ability to understand the proposed treatment
(i.e., the service plan or originally proposed alternative
treatment approaches);
(b) when a
totally new service plan with a different approach is proposed;
(c) when there has been a change in the
diagnosis of the individual; or
(d)
when there has been a change in the determination of an individual's ability to
give informed consent by the individual's interdisciplinary team or a
psychologist.
Note:
Once ability to give informed consent has been determined, it
is not necessary to reevaluate such ability unless one of the above four
conditions occur.
(9) Objections to the medication component of
a plan designed to manage inappropriate behavior may be made.
(i) Such objections may be made:
(a) by an individual 18 years of age or older
who does not have a guardian lawfully empowered to give medical consent; or by
an individual under the age of 18 where consent has not been derived from a
lawfully empowered guardian or parent;
(b) irrespective of a judgement about the
individual's ability to understand appropriate disclosures regarding a proposed
service plan; and
(c) by conveying
the objection in whatever manner is typically utilized by an individual to
communicate a meaningful decision (which does not include stereotypic actions,
reactions, or responses).
(ii) If all reasonable attempts to resolve
the issue have not resulted in agreement to proceed with the use of medication,
then the medication component of a service plan shall not be administered
without an order of a court of competent jurisdiction. Notification of the
individual's objection to medication shall be given to the party or committee
having initially given consent.
(10) Consent committee.
(i) This committee need not be a "standing"
committee. It may be a committee convened on an as-needed basis with
appropriate representation for the purpose of reviewing a request(s) for
informed consent.
(ii) Informed
consent may be obtained from a committee convened for that purpose, for service
plans, including ones designed to manage inappropriate behavior, and inclusive
of those employing medication for such purpose, where such service plans
constitute an untoward risk to the individual's protection or rights, if a duly
appointed guardian or other parties authorized by this section to give informed
consent are unavailable to do so.
(iii) Each B/DDSO shall arrange for the
creation of a committee. Services of a committee may be made available to
community-based facilities, whether State or voluntary agency
operated.
(iv) Voluntary
agencies/facilities may arrange for the creation of their own committee(s) or,
if available, use the one provided by the B/DDSO.
(v) When a consent committee meeting is
convened, it shall:
(a) consist of at least
three individuals or parties, with a majority having no ownership, employment
relationship or other interest in the agency/facility which would compromise
his or her objectivity in decisionmaking.
(b) have at least one QIDP; and
(c) not include anyone who is involved in the
care and treatment of an individual whose service plan is under
review.
(vi) Membership
shall be drawn from the following groups:
(a)
staff members;
(b) staff members of
another agency/facility;
(c)
individuals receiving services from OPWDD-operated or certified
facilities;
(d) parents, court
appointed guardians, or family members of those with developmental disabilities
who have demonstrated sensitivity to issues surrounding the treatment of those
with such disabilities;
(e)
advocates of those with developmental disabilities who have demonstrated
sensitivity to issues surrounding the treatment of those with developmental
disabilities; and
(f) parties who
have either experience or training in contemporary practices to change
inappropriate behavior.
(vii) The Mental Hygiene Legal Services may
represent the interests of individuals before the committee where the
individual is a resident of a developmental center or is on conditional release
therefrom, and shall be notified of any committee meetings where the service
plans of such individuals will be under consideration.
(viii) The committee shall reach its decision
within 14 days of receiving an application for consent.
(ix) The committee's decision shall be by
majority vote.
(11) All
information required to be conveyed by the requirements of this section shall
be communicated in whatever language or method is appropriate to ensure
understanding by the individual and/or the individual's parent, guardian,
spouse, adult child, or other adult family member. That is, the agency/facility
personnel responsible for obtaining informed consent shall use the language,
whether spoken or written, that the individual/party is most comfortable using
and most clearly understands. Examples of acceptable forms of communication
include, but are not limited to, sign language, a communications board, a
computer-assisted technology, Braille, etc. There shall be agency/facility
policies/procedures to implement this process as well as the process whereby
individuals can be made aware of and understand, to the extent possible, the
rights to which they are entitled pursuant to this section.
(b)
Standards of certification.
(1) Standards of certification represent
those criteria which specify the basis of documenting compliance with the
requirements for the operation of an ICF/ DD. The basis of documentation may
include facility specific records; specified forms or reports; specified
contents of records; report or forms; and/or other means of assessing
compliance such as interviews with individuals residing in the facility,
employees or volunteers, and/ or on-site observation of activities and the
environment.
(2) When it has been
determined, by a specially constituted committee charged with the
responsibility, that a service plan involves untoward risk to an individual's
protection or rights, OPWDD shall verify (see glossary, section
681.99 of
this Part) that written informed consent has been obtained from:
(i) the individual, if the individual has the
ability to give informed consent and is either 18 years of age or older or is
under the age of 18 and is married; or
(ii) if the individual is 18 years of age or
older but does not have the ability to give informed consent, OPWDD shall
verify that such consent has been obtained from a court appointed guardian; an
actively involved spouse, adult child, parent, or adult family member; the
consumer advisory board for the Willowbrook class (for class members only); a
consent committee; or a court of competent jurisdiction; or
(iii) if the individual is under the age of
18 and unmarried or married and unable to give informed consent, OPWDD shall
verify that such consent has been obtained from a court appointed guardian; an
actively involved spouse, parent, or adult family member; the consumer advisory
board for the Willowbrook class (for class members only); a consent committee;
or a court of competent jurisdiction.
(3) OPWDD shall further verify that the
signed consent document is in the written language that the individual or party
giving consent is most comfortable using and most clearly understands, or
through the written verification of a witness that the individual understood
and agreed to the document before signing or putting his or her mark
thereon.