New Mexico Administrative Code
Title 3 - TAXATION
Chapter 2 - GROSS RECEIPTS TAXES
Part 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 3.2.1.29 - SERVICES
Universal Citation: 3 NM Admin Code 3.2.1.29
Current through Register Vol. 35, No. 18, September 24, 2024
A. When a transaction is predominantly a service:
(1) A transaction involving both the transfer
of tangible personal property to the buyer and the performance of a service
other than a construction or research and development service is predominantly
a service when:
(a) the seller is not
regularly engaged in selling or leasing the same or similar tangible personal
property other than in conjunction with the sale of a service; and
(b) at least one of the following conditions
applies:
(i) the transaction is primarily the
performance of work and the transfer of any property through the transaction is
incidental to the performance of the required work; or
(ii) the transaction requires the performance
of work which is substantially greater in value than the value of the tangible
personal property involved in the transaction; or
(iii) the performer of the service has the
power to influence significantly the degree of involvement of the tangible
personal property in the transaction.
(2) When the transaction is predominantly a
service other than construction, any tangible personal property transferred in
conjunction with the service is incidental to the service and the value of the
property becomes an element of and is incorporated into the value of the
service sold. Type 2 nontaxable transaction certificates (NTTCs) may not be
executed to acquire the property so incorporated.
(3)
Example A1: C, a
consultant, reviews operations of clients; C does not engage in the business of
selling office supplies. C is hired to evaluate certain operations of L. C
presents the evaluation to L as a written report, with supplemental data on
computer disks. C contends that the paper used for the report and the computer
disks were sold to L and therefore C may execute a Type 2 NTTC to acquire these
tangibles. The transaction with L is predominantly the performance of a
service. The paper and computer disks convey the result of the C's service and
are incidental to that service. C may not execute Type 2 NTTCs for the purchase
of these tangibles.
(4)
Example A2: X is engaged in the business of performing certain
services and is not engaged in selling tangible personal property in the
ordinary course of business. X enters into a cost plus a fixed fee contract
with Y to conduct a survey of residents of this state to determine consumer
acceptability of and demand for particular household products which Y
manufacturers and plans to distribute into New Mexico. The contract specifies
that on completion or termination of the contract any tangible property
purchased by X, and billed by X, will be paid by Y as a cost of fulfilling the
requirements of the contract. X chooses to purchase a personal computer to use
in the performance of the service. X will enter results of the surveys into the
computer which will classify the responses and generate reports which X will
analyze, interpret and submit to Y. Since X has the power to exert significant
influence over the degree of involvement (use) of the computer under the
contract and since X is not engaged in selling computers or similar property in
the ordinary course of business, X's receipts attributed to the cost of the
computer are receipts from performing a service. X may not execute a Type 2
NTTC for the purchase of the computer.
(5)
Example A3. A well
servicing company uses disposable bits and other disposable "rubber goods" in
servicing oil and natural gas wells. The disposable items are used up in the
course of the servicing; pieces of the abraded material are left in the well.
The company claims it should be allowed to execute Type 2 NTTCs because the
disposable items are left with the owner(s) of the well. These materials are
incidental to the performance of the service. The company may not execute Type
2 NTTCs in acquiring these disposable items.
(6) Construction is defined to be a service
and that service is defined to include all tangible personal property which
becomes an ingredient or component part of the construction project. Under the
provisions of Section
7-9-51
NMSA 1978, however, a person engaging in the construction business may execute
a nontaxable transaction certificate for the purchase of tangible personal
property which will become an ingredient or component part of a construction
project.
(7) The product of a
research and development service may be tangible property, such as prototypes,
facsimiles, reports or other similar property. Even though the product of the
service may itself be tangible, receipts from the transaction are receipts from
the sale of a service and not from the sale of tangible personal property.
Accordingly the performer of research and development services may not execute
a nontaxable transaction certificate when purchasing tangible personal property
used to assemble or create such product of the service, except as provided by
Section
3.2.205.11
NMAC.
(8)
Example
B1: B, an engineering company, contracts to design a product for Y, a
manufacturer, who intends to manufacture the product for sale to the general
public. The contract requires B to submit plans for the product and a prototype
of it. B contends that the plans and prototype are tangible personal property
and therefore Type 1 or Type 2 NTTCs may properly be executed. B is performing
a research and development service, even though the product of the service is
embodied in tangible personal property. The tangibles used are incidental to
the performance of the service. Type 1 and Type 2 NTTCs may not be executed to
acquire the tangible personal property making up the plans and
prototype.
(9)
Example
B2: B, an engineering company, is a qualified contractor within the
meaning of Section
3.2.205.11
NMAC under a contract with D, an agency of the United States. The contract is a
research and development contract covered by the agreement between the state of
New Mexico and several agencies of the United States, including D. The contract
calls for B to design and submit plans for a rocket motor and to develop and
deliver a facsimile of the rocket casing to a research facility for testing. B
maintains that B is selling tangible personal property to the federal
government. B is performing research and development services. The plans and
facsimile are products of that service. The transaction is predominantly the
performance of a service rather than the sale of tangible personal property. B
is not selling tangible personal property to the federal government but may be
eligible to execute Type 15 NTTCs if the conditions specified by Section
3.2.205.11
NMAC and the State-Federal agreement are met.
(10) When the performer of the service either
is regularly engaged in selling or leasing by itself the type of tangible
personal property transferred in the transaction, a single transaction may
encompass both the sale of a service and the sale of property as distinct and
separable parts of the transaction. In such a case, Type 2 NTTCs may be
executed to acquire the tangible personal property resold if the conditions in
Subsection A of Section
3.2.205.10
NMAC are met.
(11)
Example
B3: F, an accountant, performs bookkeeping services for several
clients. The accountant transmits various forms and papers to the clients in
the course of providing this service. G, another accountant, runs short of
certain forms and purchases some from F to tide G over until G's regular
suppliers are open for business. F contends that, because F has sold to G
tangible personal property by itself of the type sold to F's clients, two
separate transactions occur with F's clients. F is not regularly engaged in the
business of selling these forms. F's transactions with F's clients are not
separable into distinct service and tangible components. F's transactions are
predominantly the performance of a service.
(12)
Example B4: H, who
operates a computer hardware and software company, is hired to write computer
programs for one of M's divisions, acquire and set up 25 computer stations for
use of the division and to train the division personnel in the use of the
stations and programs. H contends that the computer stations are sold to M and
therefore H may execute Type 2 NTTCs to acquire them for resale. The
transaction encompasses both the performance of services (developing the
programs and training the division personnel) as well as the sale of tangible
personal property (the computer stations) as separable elements. Therefore H
may execute Type 2 NTTCs in acquiring the computer stations.
(13) See Paragraph (8) of Subsection A of
Section
3.2.205.10
NMAC for transactions in which buyer regularly sells the tangible personal
property by itself.
B. Transactions in which neither the performance of a service or the sale of tangible personal property predominates:
(1) In some cases, a transaction involving
the performance of a service other than a construction or research and
development service and the sale of tangible personal property may not be
predominately either the performance of a service or the sale of tangible
personal property, as for example where receipts attributable to each
constitutes more than forty percent of the total receipts from the transaction.
In such cases, if the market value or costs of the tangible personal property
or services is readily ascertainable and if the taxpayer's records adequately
reflect the portion of receipts derived from the sale of tangible personal
property and the portion derived from the performance of services, the receipts
may be apportioned accordingly. The burden rests on the taxpayer to provide
that information, and to justify that the portion of receipts attributable to
the sale of the tangible personal property or to the performance of services
accurately reflects the relative market value or costs, including reasonably
apportioned overhead, of the tangible personal property or services. The
clearest way of carrying that burden is to specify separately on the invoice
the charges for the property and the charges for the services, and to retain
sufficient records to allow a determination that the relative value of either
the property or the services is not overstated.
(2)
Example 1: Taxpayer X
enters into a contract with a governmental entity to maintain the entity's
computer equipment. The contract obliges X to check and maintain the equipment,
providing replacement parts such as toner cartridges on a regular basis, and to
repair the equipment, including the replacement of broken parts. X bills the
entity separately stating the charges for its maintenance and repair services
and for the replacement parts. Receipts from the charges for replacement parts
will be receipts from the sale of tangible personal property to a governmental
entity and are deductible pursuant to Section
7-9-54
NMSA 1978. Receipts from charges for the services are not deductible.
(3) Subsection E of Section 3.2.1.29 NMAC
does not apply to construction or to transactions in which prototypes or other
tangible products of a service are transferred.
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. New Mexico may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.