Current through Register Vol. 35, No. 18, September 24, 2024
A.
Relationship between certain terms and consistency in use of those terms. The
terms "sale of a service performed," "performance of a service," "product of
the service," "initial use" and "delivery" are defined or used in the Gross
Receipts and Compensating Tax Act and regulations in a way that makes them
closely related in their application. The terms are used in Section
7-9-3.5
NMSA 1978, the definition of "gross receipts," to describe gross receipts from
performing or selling services that will be subject to tax and in Section
7-9-57
NMSA 1978 to describe a deduction for sales to out-of-state buyers. Regardless
of the context in which they are used, or whether the service is performed
inside or outside the state, these terms will be interpreted and applied
consistently.
B. Delivery and
initial use of the product of construction services and construction related
services, in-person services, and services which that produce tangible personal
property.
(1) The product of a construction
service or a construction related service is delivered and initially used in
New Mexico if the related construction site is located in New Mexico.
(2) The product of an in-person service is
delivered and initially used in New Mexico if the location of the performance
of the service is in New Mexico.
(3) The product of a service, the primary
purpose of which is to produce tangible personal property, is delivered and
initially used in New Mexico if the tangible personal property is delivered to
the purchaser or a person designated to receive the property in New
Mexico.
C. Delivery and
initial use of the product of a service other than construction services,
construction related services, in-person services, or services which produce
tangible personal property - generally.
(1) As
defined under Subsection E of Section
7-9-3
NMSA 1978, "initial use" or "initially used" means the first employment for the
intended purpose and expressly excludes the following:
(a) observation of tests conducted by the
performer of services;
(b)
participation in progress reviews, briefings, consultations and conferences
conducted by the performer of services;
(c) review of preliminary drafts, drawings
and other materials prepared by the performer of the services;
(d) inspection of preliminary prototypes
developed by the performer of services; or
(e) similar activities.
(2) The location of delivery or initial use
of the product of a service is determined based on relevant facts and
circumstances, including primarily:
(a) The
location of the purchaser or the person to whom the service is intended to be
delivered.
(b) The terms of the
agreement between the parties, as evidenced by any formal writing or
documentation as well as the parties' behavior, including, but not limited to,
any behavior which constitutes an alteration of the parties'
agreement.
(c) The nature of the
service and the manner in which similar services are ordinarily delivered and
initially used.
(3) The
delivery and initial use of the product of a separate service, which is sold
with other services or property, will be determined based on the facts and
circumstances relating to that separate service. For this purpose, a "separate
service" is a service that would be considered a service under
3.2.1.29 NMAC, but may
be sold together with property or other services, and which the seller could
have sold separately to the buyer, though it was in fact sold as part of a
single transaction or contract along with other services or property.
Similarly, a single contract may involve services that are to be performed in
multiple phases, where each phase may constitute a separate service under
3.2.1.29 NMAC. The
delivery and initial use of the product of each separate service, as described
in this Paragraph (3), may occur at different locations under the relevant
facts and circumstances.
(4) A
single or separate service, as that term is used in Paragraph (3) of Subsection
C of 3.2.1.23 NMAC may, under all the relevant facts and circumstances, appear
to have multiple points of delivery or initial use both inside and outside the
state. In particular, this may be the case for services sold to businesses or
organizations. If there is a primary location of delivery or initial use, this
location will be deemed the location of delivery or initial use for purposes of
the Gross Receipts and Compensating Tax Act. The primary location of delivery
may be determined by facts and circumstances that show the location of the
persons or offices that contracted for or oversee the service or that approve
payment of the service or determine if the service has been completed properly.
The primary location of initial use may be determined by the primary location
of delivery or the place in which the most significant portion of initial use
takes place.
D.
Presumptions as to delivery and initial use of the product of the service in
New Mexico; reliance on purchaser representations. Other than services
described in Subsection B, of 3.2.1.23 NMAC, the following presumptions apply
to all sales of services unless the seller has information and evidence
sufficient to rebut the presumptions:
(1) if
the purchaser of the service is an individual, then delivery and initial use of
the product of the service are presumed to occur in New Mexico if the seller
has information showing a billing address or other primary location for that
purchaser in New Mexico;
(2) if the
purchaser of the service is a person other than an individual, then delivery
and initial use of the product of the service are presumed to occur in New
Mexico if that person's domicile or primary place of business or operations is
in New Mexico;
(3) if the purchaser
of the service is a person other than an individual and the person has its
domicile or primary place of business or operations outside New Mexico, then
delivery and initial use of the product of the services are presumed to occur
in New Mexico if the seller's primary contact for purposes of the contract or
the billing address for the services is located in New Mexico; and
(4) in a case where the facts and
circumstances demonstrate that delivery of the product of the service occurs in
New Mexico, initial use of the product of the service is presumed to occur in
New Mexico.
In order to rebut these presumptions, the seller must show
that delivery or initial use of the product of the service is not in New Mexico
considering the relevant facts and circumstances as generally described in this
Subsection C of 3.2.1.23 NMAC. The seller may also rely in good faith on
written representations made by the purchaser of the service that the initial
use of the service will not be made in New Mexico, provided that the seller has
no indication that this representation is untrue.
E. Partial performance of service inside the
state If a seller performs services partially inside and outside New Mexico
which are delivered in New Mexico but are initially used outside the state,
only the portion of the gross receipts from the service performed inside New
Mexico will be subject to the gross receipts under Sections
7-9-3.5
and
7-9-57
NMSA 1978. Because the seller delivers the product of the service in New
Mexico, the portion of gross receipts from the service performed in the state
is not deductible under Section
7-9-57
NMSA 1978. The seller may apportion the gross receipts from the service
performed inside and outside the state using the relative direct costs
incurred.
F. Change in facts and
circumstances during the performance of a service and incomplete services. A
change in facts and circumstances during the performance of a service may
change the delivery or initial use of the product of a service. Likewise, the
failure to complete the performance of a service may change the delivery or
initial use of the product of a service.
G. No effect on compensating tax due. The
provisions of this regulation apply only to a seller's determination of whether
the delivery or initial use of the product of a service are in New Mexico. A
purchaser who makes a taxable use of a service in New Mexico may owe the
compensating tax even if the seller was not required to pay tax on the gross
receipts from the performance or sale of that service.
H. Examples:
(1) A lawyer in New Mexico and her New Mexico
client, with a New Mexico billing address, agree that the lawyer will perform
the legal service of drafting a will. The lawyer charges for her service on an
hourly basis. The lawyer reviews the client's finances and other information.
The lawyer completes the will and provides it to the client. After reviewing
the will, the client executes the will. Under Subsection D of 3.2.1.23 NMAC,
delivery and initial use of the product of the service are presumed to be in
New Mexico. Nor would the lawyer be able to rebut these presumptions since,
under all the facts and circumstances, delivery of the product of the service
occurs in New Mexico when the client receives the draft will from the lawyer
and initial use of the product of the service occurs in New Mexico when the
client executes the will.
(2) Same
facts as in Paragraph (1) of Subsection H of 3.2.1.23 NMAC, except that before
the will is finally drafted, the client tells the lawyer she has changed her
mind and will not need the will. The lawyer and the client agree that the
lawyer will not provide any documentation of advice or a draft of the will
based on the work done, even though the client will pay for the hours already
worked. As in Paragraph (1) of Subsection D of 3.2.1.23 NMAC, delivery and
initial use of the product of the service are presumed to be in New Mexico. Nor
would the lawyer be able to rebut this presumption since under the product of
this incomplete service is the work done by the lawyer for the client in New
Mexico and there are no facts that would rebut the presumption that delivery
and initial use of this product occur in New Mexico.
(3) Same facts as in Paragraph (1) of
Subsection H of 3.2.1.23 NMAC, except the client is outside New Mexico and the
lawyer delivers the will to the client outside New Mexico where the client
executes the will. In this case, there is no presumption under Subsection D of
3.2.1.23 NMAC that delivery or initial use of the product of the service is in
New Mexico. Under the facts and circumstances, the product of the service, the
will, is delivered and initially used outside New Mexico. Therefore, the lawyer
will be entitled to a deduction under Section
7-9-57
NMSA 1978 provided the lawyer has evidence required to support the
deduction.
(4) Same facts as in
Paragraph (1) of Subsection H of 3.2.1.23 NMAC, except the lawyer performs the
service outside New Mexico and the lawyer delivers the will to the client in
New Mexico, where the client executes the will. As in Paragraph (1) of
Subsection D of 3.2.1.23 NMAC, delivery and initial use of the product of the
service are presumed to be in New Mexico. Nor would the lawyer be able to rebut
this presumption since under the facts and circumstances, the product of the
service, the will, is delivered and initially used in New Mexico. Note that
while lawyer in this case would have gross receipts subject to tax because the
service is initially used in the state, under
3.1.4.13
NMAC, because the service is a professional service, the gross receipts would
be sourced to the state reporting location and subject to tax at the state
rate.
(5) Same facts as in
Paragraph (2) of Subsection H of 3.2.1.23 NMAC except the lawyer is outside New
Mexico. As in Paragraph (2) of Subsection D of 3.2.1.23 NMAC, delivery and
initial use of the product of the service are presumed to be in New Mexico. In
this case, however, the product of this incomplete service is the work done by
the lawyer for the client outside New Mexico and the lawyer may, therefore, be
able to rebut the presumption that delivery or initial use of this product
occurs inside New Mexico. Assuming the lawyer can rebut the presumption and
show that initial use of the product of the service occurs outside New Mexico,
the lawyer would have no gross receipts subject to tax.
(6) A New Mexico seller agrees to provide a
consulting service to a federal government agency, contracting and overseeing
the performance of the service at an out-of-state location. The contract for
the service provides that the seller is required to prepare a report
summarizing the work and deliver that report to the out-of-state location. The
contract also provides that the government will use the report to select
products for purchase at facilities outside New Mexico. During the contract,
the government agency, which has offices in New Mexico, answers questions posed
by the New Mexico seller and responds to requests for data. Here, there is no
presumption in this case under Subsection D of 3.2.1.23 NMAC that the delivery
or initial use of the product of the service are in New Mexico. Furthermore,
under all the facts and circumstances, the product of the service, the report,
is delivered and initially used outside the state.
(7) A seller performs website design services
outside New Mexico for a client that has business locations inside and outside
the state. The seller works with and responds to the client's technology
manager the client's out-of-state office. The seller and the client agree that
the seller will make a demo of the proposed website for the technology manager
to test. After the test, the seller will finish the website, with any necessary
changes, and will give the client access to operating the website. The
operation of the website will be done primarily at offices of the client
outside the state, although some operations will also be done in the New Mexico
office. Here, there is no presumption under Subsection D of 3.2.1.23 NMAC that
the product of the service is delivered or initially used in New Mexico.
Furthermore, under all the facts and circumstances, the product of the service,
the final website, will be delivered and initially used outside the
state.
(8) A seller of medical
testing services performed outside New Mexico has a client in New Mexico who
purchases the services for its own medical facilities both inside and outside
the state. The seller of testing services charges by the test. The results of
tests are sent to the client's medical facilities in New Mexico where they are
reviewed and then made available to doctors and patients. Each testing service
is a separate sale of a service. Here, for each service, the product of the
service is presumed to be delivered and initially used in New Mexico under
Subsection D of 3.2.1.23 NMAC. The seller in this case will not be able to
rebut the presumption because, under the facts and circumstances, the product
of these services are the results which are delivered to New Mexico and
initially used at facilities where they are reviewed.
(9) A seller of payroll services performed
outside New Mexico has a business client which has offices both inside and
outside New Mexico. The seller's contact is with the business's headquarters,
outside the state, and the seller obtains information to perform the payroll
service from the business's chief accountant located in that office. Each pay
period, the seller transmits funds electronically drawing on the business's
accounts to pay employees and to submit tax returns and also transmits reports
to the business at the headquarters office. This information is reviewed by the
headquarters office and any mistakes are communicated by the business to the
seller. Each year the seller also transmits W-2s and other tax information by
mail. Here, there is no presumption under Subsection D of 3.2.1.23 NMAC that
the product of the service is delivered or initially used in New Mexico. It may
appear that the product of the service is delivered and initially used both in
and outside New Mexico. Under Paragraph (4) of Subsection C of 3.2.1.23 NMAC
and under all the relevant facts and circumstances, the product of the service,
payroll information, is deemed delivered to the primary location of delivery
outside the state and the initial use of the product of the service is,
likewise, deemed delivered to occur at the primary location of initial use
outside the state.
(10) Same facts
as the example above, except that the seller of payroll services performs those
services in New Mexico. Again, as in the previous, while the product of the
service may appear to be delivered and initially used both inside and outside
New Mexico, under Paragraph (4) of Subsection C of 3.2.1.23 NMAC and under all
the relevant facts and circumstances, the product of the service, payroll
information, is deemed delivered to the primary location of delivery outside
the state and the initial use of the product of the service is, likewise,
deemed to occur at the primary location of initial use outside the
state.
(11) A seller of video
editing services performed inside New Mexico are sold to an out-of-state
customer who posts the edited video on-line for use by its customers throughout
the United States. After the edited video is delivered and posted on the
customer's website, the customer then asks the seller in New Mexico to test
access to the video, and the seller agrees to do so. The fact that the final
action related to the service, the testing of the access to the video, occurs
in New Mexico does not change the result under all the relevant facts and
circumstances that the delivery and initial use of the product of the service,
the edited video, occurs outside New Mexico when the video is delivered to and
posted by the customer on its website.
(12) Same facts as Paragraph (11) of
Subsection H of 3.2.1.23 NMAC except that the seller in New Mexico agrees to
both edit the video and provide data from a survey of other websites. The
seller charges separately for these services, which it also regularly sells on
a separate basis, but the contract and billing information for the two services
are combined. These services would be separate services under
3.2.1.29 NMAC and the
delivery and initial use of the product of each service would be determined
based on the relevant facts and circumstances for each service.