New Mexico Administrative Code
Title 3 - TAXATION
Chapter 1 - TAX ADMINISTRATION
Part 11 - PENALTIES
Section 3.1.11.18 - WILLFUL ATTEMPT TO EVADE OR DEFEAT TAX
Universal Citation: 3 NM Admin Code 3.1.11.18
Current through Register Vol. 35, No. 6, March 26, 2024
A. "WILLFUL ATTEMPT TO EVADE OR DEFEAT" DEFINED:
(1) As used in the Tax
Administration Act, the term "willful attempt to evade" or "willful attempt to
evade or defeat" means conscious awareness of the obligation to pay taxes
coupled with either reckless disregard for, or gross negligence with respect
to, whether the tax obligation is paid. A willful attempt to evade or a willful
attempt to evade or defeat may occur either with respect to the obligation to
report or the obligation to pay.
(2) A willful attempt to evade or defeat may
include, but is not limited to:
(a) engaging
in business while not filing tax returns coupled with the knowledge that the
business is subject to tax;
(b)
filing tax returns without payment for an extended period of time while staying
in business and paying other creditors;
(c) knowingly completing false tax returns or
claiming exemptions, deductions, credits or other reductions of taxable amounts
or taxes to which the taxpayer knows he is not entitled;
(d) hiding or transferring assets to hinder
collection activity of the department; or
(e) advising or counseling any of the
foregoing in the course of one's business as an attorney, accountant,
bookkeeper, business consulting firm or tax preparer.
(3) The following are examples of a willful
attempt to evade or defeat a tax or to cause or attempt to cause the evasion of
another's tax.
(a) A is the primary
shareholder, controlling officer and sole employee of B, a closely held
corporation. B is engaged in an on-going business and, on its billings to its
customers, separately states and collects an amount denominated "gross receipts
tax". B has not filed monthly gross receipts returns for eight consecutive
months. B, however, has received frequent notices from the department and has
received telephone calls from department personnel requesting that the returns
be filed for the non-filed months and any tax due be paid. As a result of the
frequent contact from the department, B files the gross receipts tax returns,
each of which shows tax due, but refuses to pay the outstanding tax, penalty
and interest due and does not protest the tax due. B is willfully evading or
defeating the gross receipts tax due and A is willfully causing B to evade that
tax.
(b) C is the primary
shareholder and controlling officer of D, a corporation. D hires the services
of a professional accounting firm. The firm prepares D's tax returns and
forwards them to C. C receives the returns but simply stores them. D never
files the tax returns or pays the taxes due. C has willfully caused the evasion
of D's taxes.
(c) B keeps C's
books. C is a corporation. E is the primary shareholder and controlling officer
of C. B prepares the tax returns for C and drafts checks for E to sign. E signs
the returns and the checks. B never sends the returns or checks to the
department but endorses the checks to himself. B intercepts all mail and
telephone calls from the department. When E becomes aware of what B is doing, E
promptly contacts the department to make arrangements for the filing of the
returns and payment of the taxes. Making the payments, however, proves
unfeasible and C goes out of business. B has willfully caused C to evade its
taxes but E has not.
(d) L is an
attorney who is familiar with business and tax law and is the primary
shareholder in PC, a professional corporation. PC has reported and paid gross
receipts tax in the past. PC stops reporting and paying gross receipts tax; L
is aware of this. L has willfully caused the evasion of PC's taxes.
(e) N is the primary shareholder and
controlling officer of C, a corporation. C is assessed a substantial amount of
tax as the result of an audit. N causes C to cease operations. N's brother, M,
who has also worked in the business forms a new corporation D. D takes over C's
business and assets, including C's customer lists, employees and goodwill. D
operates at C's place of business, with strictly cosmetic changes in signs and
stationery. Both N and M know of C's tax obligations and intended the change in
form to strip the tax liability from the on-going business. Both N and M have
willfully caused C to evade taxes.
(f) O is a company that researches tax liens.
It contacts businesses with tax trouble as indicated by the existence of tax
liens. It advises businesses in the use of techniques to avoid holding balances
in bank accounts, thereby defeating any levy by the department on the
business's bank accounts. O is willfully causing or attempting to cause another
to evade or defeat taxes owed and may be assessed for the amount its clients
acting owe in tax.
(4)
The following examples illustrate situations which do not give rise to a
willful attempt to evade or defeat tax.
(a) G
is the primary shareholder and principal officer of C, a corporation. C is
audited and is assessed a substantial amount of tax. C had never reported or
paid gross receipts tax because G erroneously believed C's business was exempt
from gross receipts tax. C files bankruptcy under Chapter 11 and attempts to
resolve the tax liability under the bankruptcy laws. While in bankruptcy, C
reports and pays its current gross receipts tax obligations. Regardless of the
outcome of the bankruptcy proceedings, G has not willfully caused C to evade
tax.
(b) H owns C, a corporation. C
encounters considerable cash flow problems. It becomes obvious that C is
insolvent. C files three monthly tax returns without payment before going out
of business. H has not willfully caused C to evade tax.
B. BURDEN OF PROOF:
(1) The department has the burden of proving
tax evasion or the causing or attempting to cause another to evade
tax.
(2) In a protest before a
department hearing officer pursuant to Section
7-1-24
NMSA 1978, the hearing officer must find by a preponderance of the evidence
that either the taxpayer or other person who has been assessed for causing or
attempting to cause the evasion of another's tax knew of the obligation to pay
tax. The issue of whether the taxpayer or the other person actually knew of the
obligation to pay tax can be proved by reasonable inference from circumstantial
evidence, and notwithstanding testimony to the contrary which the hearing
officer finds not credible.
(3) The
issue of whether the taxpayer or other person exercised gross negligence or
willful disregard for whether taxes were paid is an objective standard to be
determined by the facts and circumstances.
C. INTEREST CONTINUES TO RUN ON ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL OF TAX ATTEMPTED TO BE EVADED: Although interest does not run ordinarily on penalty pursuant to Subsection 7-1-67 D NMSA 1978, interest continues to run on the penalty imposed under Section 7-1-72.1 NMSA 1978 to the extent of the unpaid principal of the underlying tax liability because Section 7-1-72.1 NMSA 1978 specifically authorizes the assessment of penalty and interest upon the tax which was evaded or attempted to be evaded.
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. New Mexico may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.