New Mexico Administrative Code
Title 3 - TAXATION
Chapter 1 - TAX ADMINISTRATION
Part 10 - COLLECTIONS
Section 3.1.10.16 - DETERMINATION OF SUCCESSOR IN BUSINESS
Current through Register Vol. 35, No. 18, September 24, 2024
A. The following indicia are used by the secretary or secretary's delegate as factors in determining whether a business is a successor:
B. If one or more of the indicia mentioned above are present, the secretary or secretary's delegate may presume that ownership of a business enterprise has transferred to a successor in business.
C. Example 1: A father owning a business enterprise in sole proprietorship decided to retire. He transferred the substantial part of all tangible and intangible business property to his son. The father was liable for payment of state, municipal and county gross receipts taxes in the amount of $10,000 on the date of transfer. The son continued the business enterprise, but changed the trade name, added some new product lines, sold off some obsolete equipment and rented new store, warehouse and office business locations. The son is a successor in business to his father and shall follow the provisions of Subsection 7-1-61 C NMSA 1978 by withholding or paying over the amount due.
D. Example 2: A person owning a road construction company sold one-half of the company's new and used heavy equipment to another person to reduce the company's inventory of construction equipment because the person planned to discontinue bidding on out-of-state road projects. The person plans to continue road construction services in New Mexico using the remaining equipment. The purchaser of the heavy equipment is not a successor in business to the seller since few of the indicia are present for determination of a successor in business.
E. Example 3: A title and abstract company which had been inactive for several months sold its remaining assets to a purchaser who incorporated the tangible and intangible property into the purchaser's own business. The seller was liable for payment of gross receipts taxes on the date of the transfer of the business assets and the purchaser failed to withhold and place into a trust account a sufficient amount of the purchase price to cover the taxes owed or to pay over to the department the seller's unpaid assessments of gross receipts taxes. The purchaser claimed to be unaware of the seller's tax liabilities. The department made a demand on the purchaser for payment and gave the amount and basis of the unpaid assessments of tax for which the seller was liable, in accordance with Subsection 7-1-63 A NMSA 1978. The New Mexico court of appeals upheld the department's determination that a business which changes hands need not be an active or solvent business to come under the provisions of Section 7-1-61 NMSA 1978. Although not all the separate indicia listed in Section 3.1.10.16 NMAC were applicable to this illustration, the indicia of Paragraphs 3.1.10.16A(1) through (4) NMAC used by the department did apply and supported a presumption to meet the statutory requirements of Section 7-1-61 NMSA 1978. (Sterling Title Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue, 85 N.M. 279)
F. For the purposes of Sections 7-1-61 through 7-1-63 NMSA 1978 and Section 3.1.10.16 NMAC: