New Mexico Administrative Code
Title 2 - PUBLIC FINANCE
Chapter 61 - STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND SECURITIES
Part 6 - BOND PROJECT DISBURSEMENTS
Section 2.61.6.8 - INTERPRETATION OF AUTHORIZING LANGUAGE
Current through Register Vol. 35, No. 18, September 24, 2024
A. In accordance with New Mexico law, bond proceed expenditures shall not be made for purposes other than those specified in an appropriation and any other relevant law, and must meet the definition of capital expenditure unless otherwise authorized by law. It is crucial to determine whether the purpose for a draw request falls within an appropriation's permitted use. The following provides general direction and clarification in the interpretation of authorizing language. Agencies may also refer to the Uniform Statute and Rule Construction Act, 12-2A NMSA 1978 for guidance.
B. Special meanings in road/street context - Unless specifically limited by the legislature, "to improve a road" includes anything that will make the existing road better and is deemed appropriate in the discretion of the agency responsible for the project, and could include acquisition of rights-of-way. However, the department of transportation has taken the position that "to construct a road" does not include planning, designing, right-of-way activities and acquisition, environmental documentation, environmental clearances, and other pre-construction project development tasks. Preliminary activities such as those would only be included if the legislature specified for "planning and designing."
C. Training of government employees - if training is purchased from the vendor or other third party in connection with the acquisition of any permitted property, which training is necessary to the initial use of the property, the appropriation may be used for such training costs. However, no part of the appropriation shall be used to pay for the salaries or wages of government employees during training, or travel costs for government employees to attend training.
D. Litany - when multiple verbs are listed in the appropriation, assume that they are used deliberately and to the exclusion of those not listed. When "and" is used in a list, the appropriation must be applied to all the purposes listed, unless the appropriation act provides that when the amount appropriated is not enough to pay for all the purposes listed, the funds may be expended on fewer than all of them. When "or" is used, the appropriation may be applied to any or all of the purposes listed.
E. Unusual or special appropriation language - if the appropriation language is not clear, the following interpretation guidelines may be helpful. Technical term - determine whether a technical term or term of art has an established meaning within a particular field, industry or context, such as the following examples:
F. Errors in appropriation language - if the entity, location or object erroneously referenced in the appropriation actually exists, then the funds cannot be applied otherwise, regardless of a suspected different legislative intent. If the entity, location or object erroneously referenced in the appropriation is non-existent, then the funds can be applied to the appropriate cause, if there is sufficient evidence that was the intended use.
G. Other considerations - the interpretations must make sense and not violate applicable law.
H. Interpretive memoranda - in order to develop consistency in interpretations, the board will document specific interpretive decisions that arise. The interpretive memoranda will be provided to agencies making draw requests based on interpreting language, and may be relied on for future interpretations of the same or similar terms.