Current through Register Vol. 56, No. 18, September 16, 2024
(a) To determine priority for capital grants,
all applications for eligible historic preservation projects in a given grant
round are to be ranked based on the following competitive criteria:
1. Significance of resource, which shall
involve consideration of the degree to which a property is historically,
archaeologically, architecturally, or culturally significant in the State,
under the evaluation criteria for the New Jersey and National Registers of
Historic Places;
2. The physical
condition of property, including any immediate threat of collapse, demolition
or inappropriate use or development; notice of code violations; and
deterioration requiring stabilization;
3. The overall quality of the work proposed
for funding based on the following:
i. The
quality of preliminary planning or contract documents submitted, including
degree to which documents comply with the Secretary of the Interior's
Standards;
ii. The credentials and
experience of project team or consultants; and
iii. A realistic and feasible budget and
schedule for work proposed for funding;
4. The availability of funds to match the
requested grant;
5. The ability of
the applicant to carry out the proposed work, develop programs to sustain and
interpret the property, remain accessible to the public, and provide for the
long-term protection of the property;
6. The impact of project, based on the
following:
i. The ability of the project to
create jobs or training opportunities;
ii. The potential of the project to promote
investment in and promotion of cultural and historic assets;
iii. The relationship of the proposed project
to other State, county, municipal, or organizational planning initiatives or
programs which will aid community revitalization, protect and preserve the
built or natural environment, or improve or promote heritage education and
tourism including the policies set forth in the New Jersey State Development
and Redevelopment Plan, Statewide Policies No. 9 (Historic, Cultural and Scenic
Resources), and the New Jersey State Historic Preservation Plan, with which,
the New Jersey State Development and Redevelopment Plan must be consistent;
and
iv. The proposed use and
interpretive program for site;
7. If, at the time of application, the
applicant has no legal control over the property, either in the form of a valid
15-year lease or fee simple ownership, the Trust shall evaluate the likelihood
in which ownership, or the required lease will be obtained within the time set
by N.J.A.C.
5:101-2.2(a)2 ii;
8. The degree to which the proposed project
represents innovative design or programming for a historic site and the degree
to which the project reaches new audiences;
9. The distribution of funds to achieve a
geographical balance as well as a balance between sizes and types of projects,
diversity of audiences served by projects, and diversity of historical or
cultural periods; and
10. Status of
applicant's open grants.
(b) To determine priority for historic site
management grants, all applications for eligible historic preservation projects
in a given grant round are to be ranked on the basis of the criteria pursuant
to (a)1, 2, 4, 8, 9, and 10 above, and the following competitive criteria:
1. The overall quality of the planning and
site management work proposed for funding based on the following:
i. The quality of the preliminary planning
documents and the degree to which the documents comply with the Secretary of
the Interior's Standards;
ii. The
credentials and experience of the project team or consultants; and
iii. A realistic and feasible budget and
schedule for work proposed for funding;
2. The ability of applicant to carry out the
proposed work; and
3. The impact of
the project, based on the following:
i. The
potential for the plans and documents developed to be used as a tool to foster
the protection, preservation, restoration or rehabilitation of the historic
property by a local government unit or nonprofit organization;
ii. The potential of the project to promote
other preservation activity or cultural or economic activities such as heritage
tourism;
iii. The potential of the
project to foster appropriate site management practices that will sustain the
long-term and viable use of a historic property; and
iv. The relationship of the proposed project
to other State, county, municipal, or organizational planning initiatives or
programs which will aid community revitalization, protect and preserve the
built or natural environment, or improve or promote heritage education,
including the policies set forth in the New Jersey State Development and
Redevelopment Plan, Statewide Policies No. 9 (Historic, Cultural and Scenic
Resources), and the New Jersey State Historic Preservation Plan, with which,
the New Jersey State Development and Redevelopment Plan must be
consistent.
(c) To determine priority for MCRP grants,
all applications for eligible MCRP projects in a given grant round are to be
ranked on the basis of the criteria pursuant to (a)1, 2, 3ii and iii, 4, 8, 9,
and 10 above, and the following competitive criteria:
1. Degree to which the project promotes
stewardship and maintenance of historic resources by private
owners(s);
2. Degree to which the
project fosters the goals and objectives of the New Jersey State Historic
Preservation Plan; and
3.
Organizational ability and the degree to which the applicant involves the
community in the preservation planning process.
(d) To determine priority for heritage
tourism grants, all applications for eligible heritage tourism projects in a
given grant round are to be ranked on the basis of the criteria pursuant to
(a)1, 3ii and iii, 4, 8, 9, and 10 above, and the following competitive
criteria:
1. Degree to which the project
enhances or benefits the visitor experience at the resource(s);
2. Degree to which the project fosters the
goals and objectives of the New Jersey Heritage Tourism Plan;
3. Degree to which the project addresses the
development of heritage tourism within an already existing plan or aims to
create a broader regional tourism plan or initiative;
4. The quality and appropriateness of the
project;
5. Organizational ability
and the degree to which the applicant will build upon this program proposal and
continue to foster heritage tourism, and the availability of matching funds;
and
6. Public benefit, meaning the
potential to reach new audiences, potential to promote other cultural and
heritage tourism activities, ability to create links between multiple sites,
demonstrated community support, distribution of funds throughout the State and
to a variety of projects, and ability of this grant to make a difference in the
quality of this project.
(e) To determine priority for emergency
intervention grants, all applications for eligible emergency intervention
projects are to be reviewed on the basis of the criteria pursuant to (a)1 and 2
above, and the following competitive criteria:
1. Nature and severity of the emergency or
threat; and
2. Degree to which the
Trust's intervention may positively impact the resource.
(f) To determine priority for the acquisition
of historic preservation easements, all applications for eligible acquisitions
in a given grant round are to be ranked on the basis of the criteria pursuant
to (a)1 and 9 above, and the following competitive criteria:
1. If the applicant does not own the property
in fee simple at the time of application, the Trust shall evaluate the
likelihood in which ownership will be obtained within the time set forth at
N.J.A.C.
5:101-2.2(a)3ii;
2. Designation as a National Historic
Landmark;
3. Degree to which the
site is an underrepresented resource type in the New Jersey Register of
Historic Places; and/or
4. Degree
to which the site is part of a larger open space or farmland preservation
initiative.
(g) The
Trust shall evaluate each application for a special project based on the
following criteria:
1. Degree to which the
initiative furthers the goals in the State historic preservation
plan;
2. Degree to which the
project fosters the identification, evaluation, and/or protection of
underrepresented resource types;
3.
The overall quality of the work proposed for funding based on the following:
i. The quality of preliminary planning or
contract documents submitted;
ii.
The credential and experience of project team or consultants; and
iii. A realistic and feasible budget and
schedule for work proposed for funding;
4. The ability of the applicant to carry out
the proposed work;
5. The impact of
the project based on the relationship of the proposed project to other State,
county, municipal, or organizational planning initiatives or programs which
will aid community revitalization, identify, protect, and preserve the built or
natural environment, or improve or promote heritage education and tourism
including the policies set forth in the New Jersey State Plan, or other
regional plan;
6. Degree to which
the proposed project is innovative or will reach new audiences; and
7. The need to undertake the special
initiative.