Current through Register Vol. 56, No. 24, December 18, 2024
(a) A
traffic impact study is required for those concept review applications with an
expected two-way traffic volume of 500 or more vehicle trips per day directly
accessing a State highway and with an expected peak-hour volume of 200 or more
vehicle trips directly accessing a State highway and all major access
applications with a planning review. The pages of the traffic impact study
shall be numbered and the topics shall be addressed in the same sequence as
they appear in this subsection. The study shall be completed and sealed by a
New Jersey licensed professional engineer.
(b) A traffic impact study shall include a
narrative summary as follows:
1. The
narrative summary should be in the beginning of the report and should indicate
the size and type of development and the proposed access plan. It should either
indicate that the access points are in conformance with the Access Code or
refer to the waiver request accompanying the application.
2. The narrative summary should establish
that the LOS standards set forth in
N.J.A.C.
16:47-4.2 4 through 4.29 are met. If they are
not met, the narrative summary shall evaluate and provide detailed
justification for the applicant's proposals.
3. Figures should show the location of the
lot and access points.
4. Any
fair-share financial contributions determined necessary to mitigate traffic
impacts according to
N.J.A.C.
16:47-4.3 4 shall be generally described and
illustrated.
5. Any improvements
not required by these rules, but desired by the applicant, should be presented
along with facts indicative of their workability.
6. Issues raised at the pre-application
conference shall be addressed in summary form.
(c) A traffic impact study shall include a
development description, including the following:
1. The applicant and development
name;
3. A development description based on sizes
and land use types which are compatible with those land uses listed in the
Institute of Transportation Engineers publication entitled "Trip Generation,
6th Edition," 1997 or superseding edition or other uses listed by the
Department. For land uses not listed in this source or when an applicant
believes these uses are not representative, the Department may accept
alternative evidence of representative uses;
4. Unique functional or operational
activities which relate to atypical trip making activity such as ridesharing
participation, bus intercept areas, recreational use facilities, or travel
demand management plans;
5.
Development staging identifying the year of development activities per stage
and proposed access plans;
6. A
transportation system inventory, which is a description of the physical,
functional and operational characteristics of the study area highway system
and, where appropriate, local transit service. The description should provide,
where pertinent, data on:
iv. Intersection traffic
signals and configuration;
v.
Traffic signal progression;
vi.
Percentage of heavy trucks;
viii. Adjacent access point
locations;
x. Transit routes and
stops;
7. Shared
access agreements; and
8. Proposed
transportation improvements.
(d) A traffic impact study shall include a
traffic analysis. Extensive documentation is required for the Department to
review and accept the traffic volumes presented in a traffic analysis. The
logic and calculations that provide these volumes must be shown.
1. For trip generation, applicants shall use
the Institute of Transportation Engineers publication entitled "Trip
Generation, 6th Edition," 1997 or superseding edition, or superseding rates
adopted by the Department. For land uses not listed in this source or when an
applicant believes these rates are not representative, the Department may
accept alternative evidence of representative rates. The rates shall be
summarized in tabular form for each analysis time period and indicate size,
type, and appropriate ITE land use code. The applicant must seek prior approval
from the Department or request a waiver for trip generation rates other than
those specified above. The documentation must cite specific locations and
describe the land use in detail. Facts supporting the use of rates from these
locations must be supplied.
i. The peak-hour
traffic analysis must identify site, roadway, and coincidental peak-hour
conditions, and the beginning and end of the peak-hour used. It shall show the
combination of site and background traffic which causes the most critical
impacts. The peak-hour will generally be the A.M. and P.M. weekday highway
peak-hours. The Department may, depending on development characteristics,
require analysis of other peak-hours, such as Saturday afternoon or evening. In
the event that the least peak-hour of generation of the A.M., P.M., and
Saturday conditions evaluated is 50 percent or less of the maximum peak-hour
generation, a traffic analysis shall not be required for the least
peak-hour.
ii. For mixed-use
developments, internal trips should be addressed in the trip distribution
section.
2. For trip
distribution, the procedure and rationale shall be documented. Trip tables for
each land use on the lot shall be shown. The documentation shall tie the trip
table to the data source, such as U.S. Census Journey to Work, marketing
studies, or employment data. Where existing travel patterns are used for all or
a component of the site's traffic, an explanation is required as to why the
expected patterns are likely to replicate these existing patterns.
3. The traffic assignment shall follow
logically from the trip distribution. Any special conditions must be explained.
i. Peak-hour traffic volumes covering the
analysis area shall be depicted graphically. They must identify site generated,
primary, passby, and total traffic.
ii. Entering and exiting traffic shall be
routed on public roadways and the applicant's lot. Routing on any other lot
shall meet the requirements of
N.J.A.C.
16:47-3.1 2(n).
4. Support shall be provided for any credits
or reductions for passby trips or mixed-use developments. Included shall be an
explanation of how these trips are being captured and a demonstration that the
existing traffic volume is high enough to support the rates used. Because of
the highly judgmental nature of passby trips, it is important to discuss them
at the pre-application conference. An agreement on the rates or an agreement on
the approved can be reached at the conference.
5. The study locations shall be established
pursuant to
N.J.A.C.
16:47-4.3 6.
(e) A traffic impact study may include a
travel demand management plan. This is an optional plan. The trip reduction
anticipated in an approved travel demand management plan shall be deemed to
reduce the site trips, thereby also reducing site traffic impacts and
associated fair share financial obligations.
(f) Highway traffic volumes shall be prepared
for the build year or such other years as may be appropriate due to development
staging or programmed highway improvements. The traffic volumes shall be
determined by applying background traffic growth rates, prepared pursuant to
N.J.A.C.
16:47-4.3 8, to traffic counts, obtained
pursuant to
N.J.A.C.
16:47-4.3 7. The traffic volumes shall
represent the traffic volumes anticipated on the date the access is to
open.
(g) The traffic impact study
shall include a capacity analysis.
1. The
"1994 Highway Capacity Manual" (HCM), Special Report 209, or superseding issue
is the standard for capacity analysis. The use of other procedures must be
justified and documented. Capacity work sheets must be provided as an appendix
to the traffic impact study. The Department will accept calculations performed
using computer software based on the HCM. The Department preference is for
McTrans software. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the Bureau of
Major Access Permits before using any other software. Any deviation from the
HCM accepted values shall be fully documented. Default values shall not be used
when actual values are reasonably available or obtainable.
2. Capacity analysis shall be performed at
each access point for the lot and the study locations identified in
N.J.A.C.
16:47-4.3 6. The interaction of conflicting
traffic movements shall be addressed in the traffic impact study.
3. Impacts should be evaluated with and
without development traffic and with and without any proposed transportation
improvements for the build years. For staged developments, no-build analyses
for latter stages are not to include traffic and improvements from earlier
stages of the development.
4.
Alternate access availability shall be addressed.
5. The no-build analysis of future years
shall be based on traffic signal timing which is possible with the existing
traffic signal hardware and will be appropriate for the future year no-build
traffic volumes. The build analysis may use traffic signal timing changes which
are possible with the existing traffic signal hardware and comply with the
standards for progression pursuant to
N.J.A.C.
16:47-4.2 1(a)6.
6. Summary tables shall show, as appropriate
to the type of analysis, volume, number of lanes, green time, volume to
capacity ratio, delay, LOS, and reserve capacity for each lane group or
movement on each approach. These tables shall facilitate comparison of build
and no-build conditions and of existing and improved configurations based on
the LOS standards. Sample summary tables are shown in Appendix M, incorporated
herein by reference.
7. A fair
share analysis prepared pursuant to
N.J.A.C.
16:47-4.3 4 shall be included.