New Jersey Administrative Code
Title 1 - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Chapter 1 - UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE RULES
Subchapter 17 - CONSOLIDATION OF TWO OR MORE CASES; MULTIPLE AGENCY JURISDICTION CLAIMS; DETERMINATIONS OF PREDOMINANT INTEREST
Section 1:1-17.6 - Determination of motions involving consolidation of cases from multiple agencies; contents of order; exempt agency conduct

Universal Citation: NJ Admin Code 1:1-17.6

Current through Register Vol. 56, No. 18, September 16, 2024

(a) In motions concerning multiple agencies, the judge shall initially determine the consolidation question. If consolidation is to be ordered, then a predominant interest determination must also be rendered in the consolidation order. If particular issues in the entire controversy are clearly severable, the judge's consolidation order shall specify which agency shall decide each such issue. Motions for consolidation involving predominant interest determinations must be decided within 45 days from the date of submission.

(b) If one agency is determined to have a predominant interest, that agency shall render the final decision on all issues within the scope of its predominant interest. The judge in the consolidation order shall specify the issues relating to the predominant issue and shall clearly identify the agency having the authority to issue a final decision on those issues.

(c) If there are requests for relief which may not be granted by the agency with the predominant interest, the judge shall in the consolidation order specify clearly which determinations by the agency with the predominant interest shall bind the agency subsequently considering any applications for relief.

(d) When an agency exempt under 52:14F-8(a) is determined to have a predominant interest in a contested case, the matter shall be heard by an administrative law judge unless the exempt agency decides, in its final order reviewing the judge's consolidation order to have the matter heard by its own personnel. If the exempt agency decides to have its own personnel hear the matter, but the hearer does not have jurisdiction over all issues within the scope of the agency's predominant interest, the hearer shall be designated a special administrative law judge as provided by 52:14F-6(b).

Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. New Jersey may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.