Administrative Rules of Montana
Department 38 - PUBLIC SERVICE REGULATION
Chapter 38.5 - UTILITY DIVISION
Subchapter 38.5.20 - Least Cost Planning - Electric Utilities
Rule 38.5.2022 - PLAN CONTENTS
Universal Citation: MT Admin Rules 38.5.2022
Current through Register Vol. 18, September 20, 2024
(1) Resource plans shall contain at least the following information:
(a) A description of any changes a utility
has made to the content of its plan or its planning process in response to the
Commission's comments on its last plan and how the changes affect the current
plan, along with reasoned explanations for any Commission comment with which
the utility disagrees. Cross-references shall be provided for all
changes.
(b) Annual electricity
demand and energy forecasts for each year of the planning period for each major
rate or service class; an explanation of the forecasting method(s) and
assumptions; and the historical customer counts, population data, load data,
and end-use data used in the forecasting process, as applicable. Changes to the
forecasting method(s) and assumptions used in the prior plan must be thoroughly
explained.
(c) A description and
graphical presentation of daily and seasonal electric demand and energy
requirements for each major rate or service class, the variability of those
requirements, and how the utility assessed historical trends, and the potential
for future changes in the timing and variability of electric demand and energy
requirements in the development of the plan.
(d) A description of the electric generating
capability and characteristics of each of the utility's existing resources. The
description must include the generator type and fuel source, nameplate
capacity, effective load carrying capability or other probabilistic capacity
contribution estimate, expected annual energy production, storage capability,
capacity factor, forced outage rate, annual emissions of carbon dioxide, online
date, and expected retirement date. The description must include any historical
data used to develop the reported generating capabilities and characteristics.
The description may be in table form with accompanying explanatory text, as
necessary.
(e) A description of the
current average annual variable cost or contract price for each of the
utility's existing power resources, including storage resources, and the
expected or projected average annual variable cost or contract prices at 5-year
increments for the planning period. The description may be in table form with
accompanying explanatory text, as necessary.
(f) A description of the aggregate
load-serving capability and characteristics of existing programmatic
demand-side resources within the utility's system and a forecast of aggregate
capability over the planning period. The description must address each
demand-side resource program offered and its total load-serving capabilities.
The description may be in table form with accompanying explanatory text, as
necessary. The description must provide the following historical information
for each year since the utility's last plan:
(i) program expenditures;
(ii) incentive payments;
(iii) demand and energy savings and the
methods and assumptions used to estimate the savings;
(iv) measures of the cost-effectiveness of
the program, including avoided costs, and the techniques used to estimate those
costs;
(v) annualized cost of saved
energy and capacity and the techniques used to estimate those costs;
and
(vi) estimates of the net
economic benefit of the programs.
(g) A resource adequacy assessment based on
existing resources and a description of the nature of the need for additional
resources to achieve industry-standard adequacy standards or reserve margin
requirements. The plan must completely and thoroughly describe the method(s)
and assumptions used in the assessment, including the basis for the adequacy
standard or reserve margin requirement and computer modeling and model
validation procedures. The assessment must document energy and capacity
deficits, their duration, frequency, and timing, given the energy and demand
forecasts in (b) and resource capabilities in (d) and (f). In addition, the
assessment must document energy and capacity deficits for scenarios that
involve higher and lower forecasts of energy and demand requirements;
alternative load profiles; and alternative performance levels for existing
resources to account for the effects of, among other things, extreme weather
events; demand-side and distribution-side resources; electrification; and price
response.
(h) A description of a
wide range of plausibly cost-effective resources that could be acquired to
satisfy the need for additional resources identified in the results of the
resource adequacy assessment in (g), including those that may become available
through transmission system investments that enhance access to broader markets
for power resources. The description shall include the electricity generating
or load serving capabilities and characteristics of the resources including the
technology; size; service life or contract length; performance attributes;
costs including estimates of potential fuel delivery infrastructure and
transmission system interconnection and network upgrade costs, and tax credits;
and environmental impacts including water and land use and emissions. The
description must explain the method(s) and assumptions used to identify
potential resources and define their costs, generation or load serving
capabilities, and other attributes. The description may be in table form with
accompanying explanatory text, as necessary.
(i) An evaluation of the full range of
cost-effective means of combining the resources in (h) with the continued or
discontinued operation of existing resources to satisfy the need for additional
resources identified in (g) at the lowest long-term total cost. The evaluation
must consider a broad range of future customer electricity demand and energy
requirements and risks related to uncertainty about future loads, resource
costs and performance, and changes in public policy and environmental
regulations. The evaluation must be designed to allow for a comparison of the
long-term total costs and risks of acquiring alternative resources, or
combinations of resources, to address the need identified in (g). The
evaluation must include at least two scenarios that rely on increased renewable
energy resources and demand-side resources pursuant to
69-3-1204(2)(a)(vi),
MCA. The plan must completely and thoroughly describe the results of the
evaluation and document and justify the method(s) and assumptions used in the
evaluation, including method(s) and assumptions used to determine
cost-effectiveness and computer modeling and model validation
procedures.
(j) For computer
modeling used to perform the evaluation in (i):
(i) a thorough description of the basic
design and purpose of the model;
(ii) a thorough description of the inputs and
how the model uses inputs to produce outputs;
(iii) a thorough description of the decisions
that were informed by the modeling and questions that were examined or answered
by the modeling;
(iv) comprehensive
descriptions of and data for modeling outputs and results;
(v) comprehensive, understandable
explanations of the modeling results; and
(vi) a thorough description of the process by
which a stakeholder can obtain inputs electronically in order to conduct
alternative modeling.
(k)
A description of the utility's plan for demand-side resource acquisition over
the planning period, to the extent such resources are not directly included in
the evaluation in (i). The description must include the utility's assessment of
the cost-effective demand-side resource potential on its system, including the
method(s) and assumptions used to determine cost-effectiveness.
(l) A description of the advisory committee
required in
69-3-1208, MCA, a complete and
thorough documentation of how the utility designated members and engaged the
advisory committee to review and evaluate technical, economic, and policy
issues related to the utility's system and the planning process, including all
recommendations of the advisory committee and the utility's responses, and a
copy of the work plan required in ARM 38.5.2023.
(m) A description of the public meetings
conducted pursuant to
69-3-1205(1),
MCA, including a summary of comments, concerns, or other input received and how
the utility responded.
(n) A
description of the comments received on the draft plan published pursuant to
ARM 38.5.2023 and how they were considered, including a thorough description of
modifications made to the draft plan in response to the comments or the reasons
for making no modifications.
(o) A
near-term action plan describing the steps the utility intends to take based on
the results and conclusions of the planning process, including the evaluations
in this rule. The action plan must describe the process the utility intends to
use to acquire any resources or resource types, including the use of
competitive solicitations.
(p) A
description of how information about the mix of resources used to provide the
demand and energy requirements of customers will be disseminated to them,
including information about emissions and other environmental impacts, using
itemized labeling, reporting, or other mechanisms as
appropriate.
(2) Plans that do not satisfy the requirements of this rule and 69-3-1204(2)(b), MCA will be deemed deficient and returned to the utility pursuant to 69-3-1204(3), MCA.
AUTH: 69-3-1204, MCA; IMP: 69-3-1204, 69-3-1205, 69-3-1206, 69-3-1207, 69-3-1208, 69-3-1209, MCA
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Montana may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.