Missouri Code of State Regulations
Title 6 - DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
Division 10 - Commissioner of Higher Education
Chapter 6 - Establishment of New Institutions and Instructional Sites
Section 6 CSR 10-6.020 - Standards for Establishing Residence Centers
Universal Citation: 6 MO Code of State Regs 10-6.020
Current through Register Vol. 49, No. 18, September 16, 2024
PURPOSE: This rule sets forth the criteria and standards of the Coordinating Board for Higher Education, under which residence centers may be established.
(1) Definition of Residence Center.
(A) A residence center is defined as a site
separate from the established existing campus of a four (4)-year institution or
outside the district boundaries of a two (2)-year institution and as having the
following characteristics:
1. There is a
continuing administrative presence, as evidenced by at least one (1) full- or
part-time administrative position based at the location. Part-time
administration refers to the presence of one (1) or more persons based at the
site to assume responsibilities on a continuing, day-to-day basis. Part-time
administration in this instance does not refer to those administrative services
rendered from the main campus related to establishing the courses of
instruction to be offered, such as registration;
2. Courses are to be offered in every
semester at the location;
3. There
may or may not be a complete academic program offered at the location;
and
4. There may or may not be a
physical facility owned by the parent institution but acquisition of an
instructional facility qualifies the location as a residence center regardless
of the other criteria.
(2) Submission of Proposals for Residence Centers.
(A) At such time as the governing
board of a public college or university adopts a plan to establish a residence
center as previously defined in section (1) or is asked by representatives of a
community to establish such a center, the institution may submit a proposal to
the Coordinating Board for Higher Education (CBHE) for approval.
(B) Proposals for the establishment of
residence centers shall be submitted in a format specified by the commissioner
of higher education.
(3) Criteria and Standards for Approval of Residence Centers.
(A) Proposals for the establishment of
residence centers shall address the following criteria and standards:
1. An assessment of the residence's specific
services academic programs or both of the residence center as they relate to
the role and scope of the parent institution.
A. The proposal must demonstrate that the
programs and services to be offered at a residence center are consonant with
the role and scope of the main campus. Academic programs to be offered at a
residence center shall be programs which are offered on the parent campus,
though degree programs to be offered at a residence center must be separately
approved. The proposal also must identify changes in program structure,
instructional methods and support services which will be necessary to
accommodate the clientele of the residence center and demonstrate that these
needs will be appropriately addressed.
B. Coordinating board approval of a residence
center is for specific purposes in consonance with the role and scope of the
parent institution. Any subsequent change in plans for a residence center will
require coordinating board review and approval;
2. An assessment of the need for the center.
A. Need must be clearly established in terms
of the total area to be served, including educational interests of citizens,
manpower needs of local industry, business, government and other consumers, and
compatibility with the statewide policy goals established by the CBHE. Clear
and convincing evidence of need for the proposed center shall be demonstrated
by providing information which will be generated by a survey, the form and
method for administration to be determined by the CBHE. The cost of the
administration of the survey shall be borne by the sponsors of the proposed
center, that is, by requesting the parent institution, community
organization(s) requesting such a center or both. So that respondents to the
survey can make an informed judgment, information will be provided regarding
any probable local cost, including, but not limited to, student fees and any
local tax or other funding necessary to support a center.
B. Supplemental to the results of the survey,
additional demographic information shall be provided to the coordinating board
to further substantiate the need for a center. The format and method for
providing this information will be determined by the coordinating
board.
C. Proposals also must
include evidence that the proposed center has the support of the local
business, industrial and governmental organizations which are expected to
benefit from the center. This supporting evidence shall demonstrate an
understanding of the plans and expectations for the center and may be provided
in the form of letters of support which indicate a knowledge of the plans for
the center.
D. If the coordinating
board determines that a bona fide need exists after examining the proposal, the
coordinating board will examine whether other alternatives for delivering the
services would provide quality educational services more efficiently and
effectively. If the review establishes that the need can be met by such
alternative agencies, approval for the establishment of a residence center will
be denied;
3. An
evaluation of the programs and courses to be offered at the center.
A. Proposals shall address the relationship
between the planned programs and courses and the needs assessment, the
potential for duplication of the offerings of other institutions in the area,
and the planned staffing and academic administration of courses. The parent
institution shall indicate the planned ratio of regular faculty and adjunct
faculty by discipline and whether regular faculty will teach courses at the
center as a part of their regular load or as an overload. Also, the parent
institution shall indicate whether programs offered at the proposed center will
be under the direction and control of the same academic units which administer
the programs on campus. Where there are significant differences between the
staffing and administration of on-campus programs and those to be offered at
the proposed center, the institution shall provide an explanation of the means
by which consistency in the quality of outcomes will be ensured. Approval of
this plan does not negate the need for coordinating board review and approval
of individual programs proposed for a center;
4. An evaluation of the five (5)-year
expenditure and revenue plan for the center.
A. The coordinating board will specify a
format for presenting the following financial information for the proposed
center: anticipated revenues by source, including student fees, local support
and allocation from the parent institution; planned operating expenditures by
standard program classification categories; and planned expenditures for
physical facilities acquisition, maintenance and operation. Proposals shall
specifically address the availability of facilities, adequacy of such
facilities to support planned programming and the location of facilities in
relation to the population to be served.
B. There shall be clear evidence of
sufficient local support to ensure financial access and quality of programming.
Residence center proposals also shall include displays of financial information
indicating the extent of fixed costs and anticipated constant revenues and
variable costs and revenues; and
5. An assessment of the procedures to be used
for periodic evaluation of the center.
A. A
proposal for a new residence center shall include objectives to be used in
evaluating the center after three (3) years of operation. These objectives
shall be phrased in measurable terms and shall state the minimum and the most
desirable levels of performance in terms of the following variables: student
enrollment, student retention rates in degree programs, revenues by source,
physical facilities and support services offered.
B. The evaluation plan also shall designate
positions within the parent institution having responsibility for carrying out
the evaluation and the time frame in which the evaluation will be
completed.
(B) The coordinating board may request that
the parent institution submit a general plan for phasing out the residence
center in the event that performance objectives are not met.
*Original authority: 173.005.2(3), RSMo 1973, amended 1983, 1985, 1999.
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Missouri may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.