(2) Application.
(A) An application for an operating permit
shall be made for each injection/production well and shall include each of the
following items. The application may be supplemented with copies of information
submitted for other federal or state permits.
1. All items listed in 10 CFR 144.31(e);
2. Description of the process
that will be used for the mineral extractions, including injection/withdrawal
procedures;
3. Estimated depth of
the well, casing lengths and weights, intervals to be cemented, and related
well construction data as recommended by the office of the state
geologist;
4. Maximum and average
volume of injected fluids and injection pressure that will be used on a daily
basis;
5. Appropriate application
fee as listed in 10 CSR 20-6.011;
6. Recommendation and justification on the
number and location of sampling wells by a registered professional engineer or
a qualified geologist as defined by sections 256.501 and 256.503,
RSMo;
7. Where injection is into a
formation which contains water with less than ten thousand milligrams per liter
(10,000 mg/l) total dissolved solids (TDS), monitoring wells shall be:
A. Completed into the injection zone and into
any underground sources of drinking water (USDW) above the injection zone which
could be affected by the mining operation;
B. Located in a fashion as to detect any
excursions of injection fluids, process by-products, or formation fluids
outside the mining area or zone; and
C. Located as not to be physically affected
by a subsidence or catastrophic collapse;
8. Where injection is into a formation which does not
contain water with less than ten thousand (10,000) mg/l TDS, no monitoring
wells are necessary in the injection zone;
9. Where the injection wells penetrate an underground
source of drinking water (USDW) in an area subject to subsidence or
catastrophic collapse, an adequate number of monitoring wells shall be:
A. Completed into the USDW to detect any
movement of injected fluids, process by-products, or formation fluids into a
USDW; and
B. Located as not to be
physically affected by a subsidence or catastrophic collapse;
10. In determining the number,
location, construction and frequency of sampling of the monitoring wells, the
following criteria shall be considered:
A.
Population relying on the USDW affected or potentially affected by the
injection operation;
B. Proximity
of the injection operation to points of withdrawal of drinking water;
C. Local geology and hydrology;
D. Operating pressures and whether a negative
pressure is being maintained;
E.
Nature and volume of the injected fluid, the formation water, and the process
by-products; and
F. Injection well
density;
11. Map(s)
describing an area of review for each Class III injection/production well or
group of wells, as determined by a registered professional engineer or a
qualified geologist as defined by sections 256.501 and 256.503, RSMo. The area
of review shall be that area the radius of which is determined by the lateral
distance from a Class III injection/production well or perimeter of a group of
wells in which the pressure in the injection zone may cause the migration of
injection or formation, or both, fluid into an USDW or into an improperly
constructed, plugged, or abandoned well or test hole.
A. The radius of the area of review may be
calculated using a mathematical model (for example, modified Thesis equation)
and shall be calculated for an injection time period at least equal to the
expected life of the well(s). The owner or operator must demonstrate to the
director that the mathematical model used and the calculated area of review are
appropriate for the known hydrologic properties of the underlying
formations.
B. A fixed radius
around the well or the perimeter of a group of wells of not less than one-half
(1/2) mile may be used. In determining the fixed radius, the following factors
shall be taken into consideration: chemistry of injected and formation fluids,
hydrogeology, population and groundwater use and dependence, and historical
practices in the area.
C. If the
area of review is determined by a mathematical model pursuant to sub paragraph
(2)(B)8.A. the permissible radius is the result of the calculation even if it
is less than one-half (1/2) mile.
D. Nothing in this section shall prevent the
director from imposing alternate areas of review when geologic or hydrologic
conditions render a calculated or fixed area a potential threat to an
underground source of drinking water;
12. Submit with the application a mapped and tabulated
inventory of all known water supply, injection/production, abandoned and test
wells, including field names or numbers and locations of the wells, public
water systems, within the area of review and a separate tabulation of all the
wells, which penetrate the injection zone listing each well's type,
construction method, date drilled, location, depth, and record of plugging or
completion, or both, including a description of all corrective action(s)
proposed to be performed to render wells penetrating the injection zone sealed,
plugged, or otherwise impervious to the migration of fluids into or between
well bores, USDWs, or different aquifers. The applicant is responsible for the
inventory and corrective action requirements of this section and shall extend
every reasonable effort to locate all wells within the area of review of the
applicant well(s);
13. A plan for
plugging and abandonment. Where the plan meets the requirements of this
paragraph, the director will incorporate it into the permit as a condition.
Where the director's review of an application indicates that the permittee's
plan is inadequate, the director will require the applicant to revise the plan,
prescribe conditions meeting the requirements of this paragraph, or deny the
application. For purposes of this paragraph, temporary intermittent cessation
of injection operations is not abandonment;
14. Prior to granting approval for the plugging and
abandonment of a Class III well, the director will consider the following
information:
A. The type and number of plugs
to be used;
B. The placement of
each plug, including the elevation of the top and bottom;
C. The type, grade, and quantity of cement to
be used; and
D. The method of
placement of the plugs;
15. The permittee is required to maintain financial
responsibility and resources to close, plug, and abandon the underground
injection operation in a manner prescribed by the director. The permittee must
show evidence of financial responsibility to the director by the sub-mission
surety bond or other adequate assurance such as financial statements or other
materials acceptable to the director;
16. Maps and cross-sections indicating the vertical
limits of all USDWs within the area of review, their position relative to the
injection formation, and the direction of water movement, where known, in every
under ground source of drinking water which may be affected by the proposed
injection;
17. Maps and
cross-sections detailing the geologic structure of the local area;
18. Generalized map and cross-sections
illustrating the regional geologic setting;
19. Qualitative analysis and ranges in concentrations
of all constituents of injected fluids. The applicant may request
confidentiality as specified in subsection (1)(E). If the information is
proprietary, an applicant, in lieu of the ranges in concentrations, may choose
to submit maximum concentrations which shall not be exceeded. In this case the
applicant shall retain records of the undisclosed concentrations and provide
them upon request to the director as part of any enforcement
investigation;
20. Proposed
formation testing program to obtain the information required by para graph
(2)(H)4.;
21. Proposed stimulation
program;
22. Schematic or other
appropriate drawings of the surface and subsurface construction details of the
well;
23. Plans, including maps,
for meeting the monitoring requirements of subsection (4)(D);
24. Expected changes in pressure, native
fluid displacement, and direction of movement of injection fluid;
25. Contingency plans to cope with all
shutins or well failures so as to prevent the migration of contaminating fluids
into the USDW;
26. A certificate
that the applicant has assured, through a performance bond or other appropriate
means, the resources necessary to close, plug, or abandon the well as required
by paragraph (2)(B)19.;
27. The
corrective action proposed to be taken under paragraph (2)(B)18.;
28. Where the injection zone is a formation
which is naturally water-bearing, the following information concerning the
injection zone shall be determined or calculated for new Class III wells or
projects:
A. Fluid pressure;
B. Fracture pressure; and
C. Physical and chemical characteristics of
the formation fluids;
29. Where the injection formation is not a
water-bearing formation, only the information in subparagraph (2)(A)28.B. must
be submitted;
30. Where the
permittee becomes aware that s/he failed to submit any relevant facts in a
permit application, or has submitted incorrect information in a permit
application or in any report to the director, the permittee shall promptly
submit the facts or information; and
31. Data sufficient to allow the department to carry
out aquifer exemption procedures under the Safe Drinking Water Act, UIC
program. The information shall be sufficient to demonstrate that the aquifer is
expected to be mineral or hydrocarbon producing. Information for the proposed
project, such as a map and general description of the mining zone, general
information on the mineralogy and geochemistry of the mining zone, analysis for
the amenability of the mining zone to the proposed mining method, and a
timetable of planned development of the mining zone shall be considered by the
director.
(D) Any
changes in the written authorization which occur after the issuance of a permit
shall be reported to the department by submitting a new written authorization
which meets the requirements of subsection (2)(C) of this rule.
(E) If an application is incomplete or
otherwise deficient, the applicant shall be notified of the deficiency and
processing of the application may be discontinued until the applicant has
corrected all deficiencies.
(G) Mail
applications to Water Pollution Control Program, PO Box 176, Jefferson City, MO
65102.
(H) Prior to granting
approval for the operation of a Class III well, the director shall consider the
following information:
1. All available
logging and testing data on the well;
2. A satisfactory demonstration of mechanical
integrity;
3. The anticipated
maximum pressure and flow rate at which the permittee will operate;
4. The results of the formation testing
program;
5. The actual injection
procedures; and
6. The status of
corrective action on defective wells in the area of review.