Current through Register Vol. 49, No. 6, March 15, 2024
(1) Applicability.
(A) This rule applies to the procedures to
account for emission dispersion techniques used in the calculation of any
emission limitation or any revision of any limitation to be established by the
director or to be considered for establishment by the Missouri Air Conservation
Commission (MACC). This rule also requires that all emission limitations
established by the director or by the MACC after December 31, 1970, be reviewed
for compliance with this rule.
(B)40 CFR 51, Appendix W, promulgated as of
July 1, 2 shall apply and is hereby incorporated by reference in this rule as
published by the Office of the Federal Register. Copies can obtained from the
U.S. Publishing Office Bookstore, 710 Capitol Street N W, Washington DC 20401.
This rule does incorporate any subsequent amendments or additions.
(C) Exemptions. The provisions of section (3)
of this rule not apply to emission limitation credits from-
1. Stack heights on which construction
commenced on before December 31, 1970, except where pollutants are being
emitted from the stacks by source operations which were constructed,
reconstructed, or on which major modifications were carried out after December
31, 1970; or
(2) Definitions.
(A) Commence-For the purposes of major
stationary sou construction or major modification, the owner or operator all
necessary preconstruction approvals or permits and-
1. Began, or caused to begin, a continuous
program of a actual on-site construction of the source, to be completed within
reasonable time; or
2. Entered into
binding agreements or contractual obligations, which cannot be canceled or
modified without substantial loss to the owner or operator, to undertake a
program of acconstruction of the source to be completed within a reason
time.
(B) Dispersion
technique-
1. Any technique designed to
affect the concentration of a pollutant in the ambient air by-
A. Using that portion of a stack which
exceeds good engineering practice stack height;
B. Varying the rate of emission of a
pollutant according atmospheric conditions or ambient concentrations of that
pollutant; or
C. Increasing final
exhaust gas plume rise by manipulating source process parameters, exhaust gas
parameters, stack be parameters, or combining exhaust gases from several
existing N. stacks into one (1) stack; or other selective handling of exhaust
gas streams so as to increase the exhaust gas plume rise; and
2. This definition does not
include: do
A. The reheating of a gas stream,
following use of a pollution control system, for the purpose of returning the
gas to the or temperature at which it was originally discharged from the
installation generating the gas stream;
B. The merging of exhaust gas streams where-
(I) The installation owner or operator
demonstrates that the installation was originally designed and constructed with
1, the merged gas streams;
(II)
After July 8, 1985, the merging is part of a change in operation at the
installation that includes the installation of emissions control equipment and
is accompanied by a net reduction in the allowable emissions of a pollutant.
This exclusion from the definition of dispersion technique shall apply only to
the emission limitation for the pollutant affected by a change in operation;
or
(III) Before July 8, 1985, the
merging was part of a change in operation at the installation that included the
installation of emissions control equipment or was carried out for sound ).
economic or engineering reasons. Where there was an increase in the emission
limitation or in the event that no emission limitation at was in existence
prior to the merging, the director shall presume 0- that merging was
significantly motivated by an intent to gain he emissions credit for greater
dispersion. Without a demonstration de by the source owner or operator that
merging was not significantly motivated by that intent, the director shall deny
credit for the of effects of merging in calculating the allowable emissions for
the source;
C. Smoke
management in agricultural or silvicultural prescribed burning
programs;
D. Episodic restrictions
on residential wood burning and open burning; or on
E. Techniques under subparagraph (2)(B)1.C.
of this rule which increase final exhaust gas plume rise where the resulting
allowable emissions of sulfur dioxide from the installation do not d- exceed
five thousand (5,000) tons per year.
(C) Emission limitation-A regulatory
requirement, permit condition, or consent agreement which limits the quantity,
rate, re or concentration of emissions on a continuous basis, including d, any
requirement which limits the level of opacity, prescribes equipment, sets fuel
specifications, or prescribes operation or maintenance procedures for an
installation to assure continuous emission reduction.
(D) Excessive concentration
1. For installations seeking credit for
reduced ambient pollutant concentrations from stack height exceeding that
defined in paragraph (2)(E)2. of this rule, an excessive concentration is a
maximum ground-level concentration due to emissions from a a stack due in whole
or part to downwash, wakes, or eddy effects produced by nearby structures or
nearby terrain features which a- are at least forty percent (40%) in excess of
the maximum concentration experienced in the absence of the downwash, wakes, or
eddy effects, and that contributes to a total concentration due to emissions
from all installations that is greater than an ambient air quality standard.
For installations subject to the prevention of significant deterioration
program as set forth in 10 CSR 10-a 6.060(8), an excessive concentration means
a maximum ground-level concentration due to emissions from a stack due to the
same conditions as mentioned previously and is greater than a prevention of
significant deterioration increment. The allowable emission rate to be used in
making demonstrations under this definition shall be prescribed by the new
source performance regulation as referenced by
10 CSR
10-6.070 for the source category unless the owner or
operator demonstrates that this emission rate is infeasible. Where
demonstrations are approved by the director, an alternative emission rate shall
be established in consultation with the source owner or operator;
2. For installations seeking credit after
October 11, 1983, for increases in stack heights up to the heights established
under paragraph (2)(E)2. of this rule, an excessive concentration is either-
A. A maximum ground-level concentration due
in whole or part to downwash, wakes, or eddy effects as provided in paragraph
(2)(D)1. of this rule, except that the emission rate used shall be the
applicable emission limitation (or, in the absence of this limit, the actual
emission rate); or
B. The actual
presence of a local nuisance caused by the stack, as determined by the
director; and
3. For
installations seeking credit after January 12, 1979, for a stack height
determined under paragraph (2)(E)2. of this rule where the director requires
the use of a field study of fluid model to verify good engineering practice
stack height, for installations seeking stack height credit after November 9,
1984, based on the aerodynamic influence of cooling towers, and for
installations seeking stack height credit after December 31, 1970, based on the
aerodynamic influence of structures not represented adequately by the equations
in paragraph (2)(E)2. of this rule, a maximum groundlevel concentration due in
whole or part to downwash, wakes, or eddy effects that is at least forty
percent (40%) in excess of the maximum concentration experienced in the absence
of downwash, wakes, or eddy effects.
(E) Good engineering practice (GEP) stack
height-The greater of-
1. Sixty-five meters
(65 m) measured from the ground-level elevation at the base of the
stack;
2. For stacks on which
construction commenced on or before January 12, 1979, and for which the owner
or operator had obtained all applicable permits or approvals required under 40
CFR 51 and 52, Hg = 2.5H provided the owner or operator produces evidence that
this equation was actually relied on in establishing an emission limitation;
and for all other stacks, Hg = H + 1.5L Where: Hg = GEP stack height, measured
from the ground-level elevation at the base of the stack; H = height of nearby
structure(s) measured from the ground-level elevation at the base of the stack;
and L = lesser dimension, height, or projected width of the nearby
structure(s). Provided that the director may require the use of a field study
or fluid model to verify GEP stack height for the installation; or
3. The height demonstrated by a fluid model
or field study approved by the director, which ensures that the emissions from
a stack do not result in excessive concentrations of any air pollutant as a
result of atmospheric downwash, wakes, or eddy effects created by the source
itself, nearby structures, or nearby terrain features.
(F) Major modification-Any physical change or
change in the method of operation at an installation or in the attendant air
pollution control equipment that would result in a significant net emissions
increase of any pollutant. A physical change or a change in the method of
operation, unless previously limited by enforceable permit conditions, shall
not include:
1. Routine maintenance, repair,
and replacement of parts;
2. Use of
an alternative fuel or raw material by reason of an order under sections 2(a)
and (b) of the Energy Supply and Environmental Coordination Act of 1974, a
prohibition under the Power Plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, or by
reason of a natural gas curtailment plan pursuant to the Federal Power
Act;
3. Use of an alternative fuel
or raw material, if prior to January 6, 1975, the source was capable of
accommodating the fuel or material, unless the change would be prohibited under
any enforceable permit condition which was established after January 6,
1975;
4. An increase in the hours
of operation or in the production rate unless the change would be prohibited
under any enforceable permit condition which was established after January 6,
1975; or
5. Use of an alternative
fuel by reason of an order or rule under section 125 of the Clean Air
Act.
(G) Nearby-Nearby,
as used in the definition good engineering practice (GEP) stack height in
paragraph (2)(E)2. of this rule, is defined for a specific structure or terrain
feature-
1. For purposes of applying the
formula provided in paragraph (2)(E)2. of this rule, nearby means that distance
up to five (5) times the lesser of the height or the width dimension of a
structure, but not greater than one-half (1/2) mile; and
2. For conducting fluid modeling or field
study demonstrations under paragraph (2)(E)3. of this rule, nearby means not
greater than one-half (1/2) mile, except that the portion of a terrain feature
may be considered to be nearby which falls within a distance of up to ten (10)
times the maximum height of the feature, not to exceed two (2) miles if feature
achieves a height one-half (1/2) mile from the stack that is at least forty
percent (40%) of the GEP stack height determined by the formula provided in
paragraph (2)(E)2. of this rule, or twenty-six meters (26 m), whichever is
greater, as measured from the ground-level elevation at the base of the stack.
The height of the structure or terrain feature is measured from the
ground-level elevation at the base of the stack.
(H) Stack-Any spatial point in an
installation designed to emit air contaminants into ambient air. An accidental
opening such as a crack, fissure, or hole is a source of fugitive emissions,
not a stack.
(I) Definitions of
certain terms in this rule, other than those specified in this rule section,
may be found in 10 CSR 10-6.020.
(3) General Provisions.
(A) The degree of emission limitation
required of any installation for control of any air pollutant must not be
affected by that portion of any installation's stack height that exceeds good
engineering practice (GEP) or by any other dispersion technique, except as
provided in section (1).
(B) Before
the director or the MACC establishes an emission limitation that is based on a
GEP stack height that exceeds the formula GEP height allowed by this rule, the
director must notify the public of the availability of the demonstration study
and must provide opportunity for public hearing on it.
(C) This rule does not restrict the actual
stack height of any installation or the use of any dispersion technique by any
installation.
(4)
Reporting and Recordkeeping. (Not applicable)
(5) Test Methods. (Not applicable)
*Original authority: 643.050, RSMo 1965, amended 1972,
1992.