Current through Register Vol. 49, No. 13, September 23, 2024
Subpart
1.
Applicability.
This part applies when a plan is not being implemented for a
watershed either because no watershed management organization exists, because
the organization has not adopted an approved plan, or because the approved plan
is not being carried out.
Subp.
2.
Petition.
The board shall establish just cause for determining whether
a plan is being properly implemented by review of a written petition. A
petition may be made by a plan review agency, board staff, a local government
unit, or 50 residents with land in the area that is subject to the petition. A
petition must be made in writing to the executive director of the board and
must summarize the issues at dispute and the efforts the party made to resolve
the problem.
Subp. 3.
Petition review process.
A.
Within 30 days of receiving a written petition, board staff are required to
send a copy to the plan review authorities and the organization and initiate a
preliminary assessment including a review of relevant documents, review of
comments from the plan review authorities and the organization, and discussions
with involved parties. The results of the preliminary assessment shall be
reviewed with the executive director and a report prepared if the executive
director determines just cause exists. Just cause may be established if no
annual report or audit has been submitted compliant with the requirements in
part 8410.0150, or if a plan has not
been amended according to part
8410.0140, subpart
1, item C. Just cause may be
established for other reasons according to subpart 3a. The executive director
of the board may combine multiple petitions involving the same organization and
process as one decision. If the executive director determines just cause does
not exist, the petitioner, the organization, and the plan review authorities
shall be provided written notice of the decision.
B. If just cause is established, board staff
shall conduct further investigation and prepare a report. The report shall
conclude whether a failure to implement exists, define the exact nature of the
failure to implement, and recommend a course of action. The report shall be
sent to the petitioner, the organization, and the plan review authorities.
Board staff shall provide written notification to all those to whom it sent the
report of the time and location of a meeting to discuss the contents of the
report.
C. The organization is
allowed 60 days after the meeting in item B to hold a public hearing to develop
a formal course of action and send a formal response by mail to the board and
known aggrieved parties.
Subp.
3a.
Criteria and standards for determinations.
In making a determination on the petition, the board must
consider:
A. whether the joint powers
agreement and watershed management plan complies with this chapter and
Minnesota Statutes, section
103B.211,
subdivision 1;
B. whether the
organization is actively implementing a plan that has been approved by the
board within the previous ten years. At a minimum, the organization is
addressing its priority issues in the plan, is carrying out its implementation
actions, has a current monitoring program to assess whether progress is being
made on goals, and has made progress on goals for the priority
issues;
C. whether the organization
is actively implementing the actions adopted in its plan that were derived from
a county groundwater plan that has been approved by the board and adopted by
the county;
D. whether the
organization has a contact person that is capable of answering questions about
the organization and able to assist local governments and citizens in resolving
their concerns;
E. whether the
organization submits annual activity reports and audits that comply with the
requirements in part 8410.0150;
F. whether an evaluation under Minnesota
Statutes, section
103B.102,
of an organizations performance, financial, and activity information resulted
in any corrective actions or areas of concern;
G. whether the organization sufficiently
implemented the actions in its previous plan and made progress on attaining the
goals in its previous plan;
H.
whether the organization maintains a website that complies with part
8410.0150, subpart 3a;
and
I. any other factors pertinent
to the petition.
Subp.
4.
Determinations.
A. On receipt of the information under
subpart 3,
items B and C, the board may:
(1) do nothing
further if the staffs recommendation is that the subject plan is being properly
implemented, provided the board concurs;
(2) advise board staff to conduct additional
fact finding it considers necessary and report back to the board
accordingly;
(3) direct the
organization to develop an amended plan;
(4) set a time period for the submission of
an amended plan that reflects the complexity of the amendments;
(5) direct staff or the dispute resolution
committee to attempt to resolve the matter and to advise the board further;
or
(6) issue findings of fact and
conclusions of its investigation advising the affected organizations, county,
or counties of the documented failure to implement the subject plan and advise
the appropriate unit of government to complete its responsibility under
Minnesota Statutes, section
103B.231,
subdivision 3, paragraph (b) or (c), within a prescribed period of
time.
B. The board shall
provide written notice of the determination to the petitioner, the
organization, and the plan review authorities.
C. On issuance of its findings under item A,
subitem (5), the board shall notify the appropriate counties to proceed as
required by Minnesota Statutes, section
103B.231,
subdivision 3, paragraph (b) or (c), as applicable. If a county fails to act
after it is notified, the board shall notify state agencies that they may
initiate their responsibilities under Minnesota Statutes, section
103B.231,
subdivision 3, paragraph (g).
Subp.
5.
Appeal of determinations or decisions.
A. No appeal may be made to the board for the
boards dispute resolution committee established under Minnesota Statutes,
section
103B.101,
subdivision 10, to hear and resolve disputes concerning plan implementation
until after the procedures in subpart
4 have been completed or
until after the executive director has made a decision that just cause does not
exist under subpart 3, item
A.
B. The determination of the
board under subpart 4 or
the decision of the executive director that just cause does not exist under
subpart 3, item
A, is final if not appealed to the executive director of the board within 30
days after the date on which the notice of determination or decision is sent to
those required to receive notice. A written appeal may be made by the
petitioner or the organization. Within 30 days after receiving the appeal, the
board, its dispute resolution committee, or its executive director must decide
whether to hear the appeal. An appeal may be denied and not heard if the board,
its dispute resolution committee, or its executive director decide the appeal
is without sufficient merit, trivial, or brought solely for purposes of
delay.
C. After an appeal is
granted, the appeal must be decided by the board within 60 days after the close
of the hearing record by the dispute resolution committee. Parties to the
appeal are the appellant and the organization. The board or its executive
director may elect to join multiple appeals involving the same organization and
actions into one decision. A party aggrieved by the boards final decision may
seek judicial review as provided in Minnesota Statutes, sections
14.63 to
14.69.
Subp. 6.
Determination
necessary for watershed district termination.
A determination of failure to implement under subpart
4, item A, subitem (5), is
necessary before the board may terminate a watershed district under Minnesota
Statutes, section
103B.221.
Statutory Authority: MS s
103B.101;
103B.211;
103B.227;
103B.231;
103B.235;
103B.239