Minnesota Administrative Rules
Agency 181 - Revenue Department
Chapter 8100 - AD VALOREM TAXES; UTILITIES
Part 8100.0300 - VALUATION
Current through Register Vol. 49, No. 13, September 23, 2024
Subpart 1. General.
Because of the unique character of public utility companies, the traditional approaches to valuation estimates of property (cost, capitalized income, and market) must be modified when utility property is valued. Consequently, the value of utility company property is estimated in the manner provided in this chapter.
All indicators of value must be considered to determine their validity relating to the specific property being valued. If an indicator is not demonstrated to be reliable or of value for the specific property being appraised it must not be used.
Subp. 2. [Repealed, 31 SR 1317]
Subp. 3. Cost approach.
1. | Utility Plant | $ 200,000,000 |
2. | Construction Work in Progress | $ 5,500,000 |
3. | Contributions in Aid of Construction | $ 250,000 |
4. | Leased Property | $ 750,000 |
5. | Total Plant | $ 206,500,000 |
6. | Book Depreciation | $ 40,000,000 |
7. | Depreciation on CIAC | $ 10,000 |
8. | Depreciation on Leased Property | $ 25,000 |
9. | Total Depreciation | $ 40,035,000 |
10. | Total Cost Indicator of Value | $ 166,465,000 |
Subp. 4. Income approach.
The income indicator of value is estimated by weighting the capitalized net operating earnings of the utility company for the most recent three years as follows: most recent year, 40 percent; previous year, 35 percent; and final year, 25 percent. Utilities may request the removal of nonrecurring items of income or expense. The commissioner must determine if removal of the item is appropriate. The net income is capitalized by applying a capitalization rate that is computed by using the band of investment method. This method considers:
Capitalization rates are computed for electric companies, gas distribution companies, natural gas transmission systems, and fluid pipeline companies. The rates are recalculated each year using the method described in this subpart.
The following example illustrates how the income indicator of value would be computed for a gas distribution company:
year 1 | year 2 | current year | ||
1. | Net Operating Income | $ 394,000 | $ 450,000 | $ 470,000 |
2. | Weighting Factor | 25% | 35% | 40% |
3. | Weighted Income to be Capitalized | 98,500 | 157,500 | 188,000 |
4. | Capitalized Income at 9.25% | 1,064,865 | 1,702,703 | 2,032,432 |
5. | Total Income Indicator of Value | $ 4,800,000 |
Subp. 4a. Additional indicators of value.
Additional indicators of value, other than the cost and income indicators, may exist in some situations. When additional indicators of value exist, the commissioner has the discretion to use these additional indicators in computing the unit value of a utility. Additional indicators of value include, but are not limited to, the market indicator.
Subp. 5. Unit value computation.
The unit value of the utility company is equal to the total of the weighted indicators of value. The total weighting must equal 100 percent. The default weightings of the indicators are: market indicator, 0 percent; cost indicator, 50 percent; income indicator, 50 percent.
The following is an example of the computation of the unit value for a utility company when the market indicator has been determined to be a valid additional indicator of value:
1. | Cost Indicator of Value: | |
$5,000,000 x 47.5% = $2,375,000 | ||
2. | Income Indicator of Value: | |
$4,800,000 x 47.5% = $2,280,000 | ||
3. | Market Indicator of Value: | |
$5,500,000 x 5% = $275,000 | ||
4. | Unit Value of Utility Company: | |
Sum of indicators = $4,930,000 |
Subp. 5a. Valuation election for cooperative associations.
After assessment year 2007, cooperative associations have the option to irrevocably elect the method under which they are valued.
Subp. 6. Cost less depreciation method of valuation for utility property of cooperatives, municipal power agencies, and pipelines that are not common carriers.
Cooperative associations may irrevocably elect to have their property valued using the unit value method described in subparts 1 to 5. Cooperative associations not electing unit valuation and other types of utilities which do not operate in the traditional profit-making mode, are not common carriers, or are nonregulated, must have their utility property valued on the basis of cost less depreciation. Elections made by a cooperative association prior to November 1 of any year are effective the next assessment year. Such elections must be in a format prescribed by the commissioner.
Depreciation for the year is calculated by multiplying the total cost at the end of the year preceding the assessment year by 2-1/2 percent. Depreciation on retirements is calculated by dividing the total depreciation for the year preceding the assessment year by total cost at the beginning of the year preceding the assessment year. This number is then multiplied by the original cost of retirements for the year; the result is equal to the depreciation on retirements for the year.
Net depreciation for the year is calculated by adding the total depreciation at the beginning of the year preceding the assessment year and the depreciation for the year, and then subtracting the depreciation on retirements for the year. Net depreciated value for the year is equal to the total cost at the end of the year preceding the assessment year less net depreciation for the year. Net depreciated value for the assessment year is the total market value for all property owned by the company.
A company factor is calculated by dividing the net depreciated value for the assessment year by the total cost at the end of the year preceding the assessment year. The factor is multiplied by the cost of each individual parcel at the end of the year preceding the assessment year to derive the market value of each individual parcel.
Cost of individual parcels on 12/31/2005 = | $ 105,000 | |
$ 520,000 | ||
$ 415,000 | ||
$ 100,000 | ||
Total cost on 12/31/2005 of all property = | $ 1,140,000 | |
Total depreciation on 1/1/2005 = | $ 300,000 | |
Total cost on 1/1/2005 = | $ 1,100,000 | |
Original cost of retirements in 2006 = | $ 6,000 | |
1. | Depreciation for the assessment year 2006 ($1,140,000 x .025) = | $ 28,500 |
2. | Depreciation on assessment year 2006 retirements ($300,000 / $1,100,000) x $6,000 = | $ 1,636 |
3. | Net depreciation for the assessment year 2006 ($300,000 + $28,500 - $1,636) = | $ 326,864 |
4. | Depreciation Limit ($1,140,000 x .75) = | $ 855,000 |
5. | Net depreciated value for the assessment year 2006 (Total cost on 12/31/2005 - Lesser of Line 3 or Line 4) ($1,140,000 - $326,864) = | $ 813,136 |
This is the market value for all property owned by the cooperative. | ||
6. | Company depreciation factor for 2006 ($813,136 / $1,140,000) = | 71.327751% |
7. | Market value of each individual parcel ($105,000 x 71.327751%) = | $ 74,900 |
($520,000 x 71.327751%) = | $ 370,900 | |
($415,000 x 71.327751%) = | $ 296,000 | |
($100,000 x 71.327751%) = | $ 71,300 |
Subp. 7. [Repealed, 21 SR 749]
Subp. 8. Retirements.
Utility operating property may be retired from the utility system while still in place if certain criteria are met:
Statutory Authority: MS s 270.06; 270.11; 270C.06; 273.33; 273.37; 273.38