Minnesota Administrative Rules
Agency 172 - Private Detective and Protective Agent Services Board
Chapter 7506 - PRIVATE DETECTIVES AND PROTECTIVE AGENTS
GENERAL
Part 7506.0110 - INTERNAL PROCEDURES
Universal Citation: MN Rules 7506.0110
Current through Register Vol. 48, No. 39, March 25, 2024
Subpart 1. Executive director.
The executive director has the following duties:
A. to manage the day-to-day business of the
board;
B. to set the agenda for
board meetings;
C. to bring
specific and general matters before the board at board meetings;
D. to present the position and reasoning of
the board at hearings before the Office of Administrative Hearings;
E. to conduct background investigations and
report to the board on board reviews, new applications, and complaints
concerning license holders; and
F.
other duties related to board business as directed by the board.
Subp. 2. Licensing procedure.
The board shall follow the procedures in items A to C for issuing licenses.
A. The board shall
review each initial license application. The initial license review shall
consist of:
(1) a review of the
application;
(2) a review of the
findings of the executive director's investigation; and
(3) an in-person interview of the applicant
or the applicant's qualified representative and Minnesota manager, if
applicable.
B. The board
shall review each application for license reissuance. The reissuance review
shall consist of:
(1) a review of the
documentation submitted by the applicant;
(2) a review of the findings of the executive
director's investigation; and
(3)
an in-person interview which may be requested by the applicant or required by
the board if supplemental information is necessary to complete the board's
review of the application.
C. If the initial application is not complete
within four months of the first submission, the board shall review the
application and determine whether some or all of the application process shall
be repeated by the applicant or if the application shall be denied and
reapplication required. The board's determination shall be based on the
following factors:
(1) whether the information
required in the application has lost substantial probative value due to the
passage of time; and
(2) whether
the delay in processing the application is due to delay by the applicant or the
workload of the board.
Statutory Authority: MS s 326.3331
Disclaimer: These regulations may not be the most recent version. Minnesota may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.