Current through Register Vol. 49, No. 13, September 23, 2024
Subpart 1.
For new applications.
If the commissioner determines that an adequate supply of
water is available and that the proposed project is reasonable and practical as
determined based on parts 6115.0670 and 6115.0680 to 6115.0720, but that there
is a probable interference with public water supply well(s) and private
domestic well(s) which may result in reducing the water levels beyond the reach
of those wells, the following procedures shall apply:
A. The applicant shall be responsible for
obtaining and providing to the commissioner, available information including
depth, diameter, nonpumping and pumping levels, quality, and well construction
details for all domestic and public water supply wells located within the area
of influence of the proposed appropriation well.
B. The commissioner may require aquifer tests
or other field tests to be conducted.
C. The commissioner shall determine the
probable interference with the domestic and public water supply wells based on
theoretic computations using available information regarding the aquifer
characteristics obtained from aquifer tests and/or from hydrologic studies, and
the probable effects of lowering the water levels in the domestic and public
water supply wells due to the proposed appropriation in the area. For public
supply wells only the probable interference with that portion which is used for
domestic water supply is considered.
D. The commissioner shall provide the
prospective appropriator with an evaluation of the nature and degree of effect
of the appropriation on the water levels of the domestic well(s) and public
water supply well(s).
E. The
commissioner shall not issue the permit until the applicant agrees to exercise
any of the following options within 30 days after written notification by the
commissioner:
(1) accept a modification or
restriction of the permit application to provide for an adequate domestic water
supply; or
(2) submit a written
agreement signed by the applicant and all parties identified under item C as
having probable interference. Such agreement shall outline the measures that
will be taken to ensure maintenance of water supplies to such identified
parties to the extent that would have existed absent the proposed
appropriation. In cases where no agreement can be reached, the commissioner
shall implement the settlement procedure identified in item D.
Subp. 2.
For
existing permits.
If complaints are made to the commissioner by private
domestic well owner(s) or public water supply authority regarding the effects
of a water appropriation on the domestic water supplies, the following
procedures shall be followed:
A. The
commissioner shall provide complaint forms to the parties making the complaint,
thereafter referred to as "complainant."
B. Upon receipt of the completed complaint
forms the commissioner shall notify the permittee, the applicable watershed
district, and the soil and water conservation district and any other
governmental agency or person who may be affected or has expressed interest in
the complaint.
C. The commissioner
shall investigate and assess the complaint by:
(1) Analyzing and evaluating the submitted
complaint forms, hydrologic facts and characteristics of the water supply
systems involved.
(2) Requesting
additional facts from the complainant(s) and the permittee when necessary. In
order to assure that available data on domestic well(s) are provided, the
complainant shall cooperate with the permittee in providing such facts as may
be available and allowing the commissioner access to obtain necessary available
facts. If the complainant does not cooperate in providing available facts or
allowing the commissioner access to the domestic well(s), the commissioner
shall dismiss the complaint.
(3)
Conducting, if necessary, a field investigation.
(4) Additional hydrologic tests and
evaluation shall be required if hydrologic information is unavailable or
inadequate to make a determination of necessary facts in the matter. For
irrigation appropriations, the timing and conduct of such tests shall be in
accordance with the provision of Minnesota Statutes, section
103G.271,
subdivision 3, relating to modifying or restricting appropriation for
irrigation.
(5) In evaluating the
probable influence of the water appropriation on the domestic well(s) and
public water supply well(s) the commissioner shall consider whether the
domestic well(s) provides a dependable water supply while meeting the
appropriate health requirements for the existing use of the affected well. For
public water supply wells only the probable interference with that portion
which is used for domestic water supply is considered.
D. Where adverse effects on the domestic
well(s) are substantiated, the commissioner shall notify the permittee of the
facts and findings of that complaint evaluation. In the event that the
commissioner determines that the domestic water supply is endangered the
commissioner shall, pursuant to part 6115.0750, subpart 7, unless a temporary
solution is worked out, restrict or cancel the appropriation until such time as
a decision has been made by either negotiation, settlement, or
hearing.
E. The permittee shall
within 30 days after written notification by the commissioner take appropriate
action by exercising any of the following options:
(1) Requesting the commissioner to modify or
restrict the permit in order to provide for an adequate domestic water
supply.
(2) Negotiating a
reasonable agreement with the affected well owner(s). If no agreement is
reached, the settlement procedure outlined in subpart 4 shall apply;
or
(3) Requesting a public
hearing.
Subp.
3.
New domestic wells installed after appropriation permits
have been issued.
In the event that new domestic wells, exempt from permit
requirements, are installed in area of adequate ground water supplies where
permits have been issued for appropriation the following shall apply:
A. It shall be the responsibility of the
prospective new domestic well owner to ensure that the new domestic well will
be constructed at adequate depth so that it will provide an adequate domestic
water supply which will not be limited by the permitted
appropriation.
B. Holders of valid
permits for appropriation of water in areas where adequate water supplies are
available shall not be responsible for well interference problems, involving
new domestic wells exempt from permit, when such exempt domestic wells are
installed subsequent to authorized appropriation.
Subp. 4.
Settlement.
If the applicant or permittee and the complainant(s) have
been unable to negotiate a reasonable agreement pursuant to subparts 1, item E
and 2, item E, the following procedure shall be implemented:
A. The applicant or permittee shall submit to
the complainant a notarized written offer including a statement that the
complainant must respond in writing to the commissioner within ten days from
the receipt of the offer either accepting the offer or explaining why it is
rejected. The offer must be submitted to the complainant with a copy to the
commissioner within 40 days after the receipt of the written notification
provided in subparts 1, item E and 2, item E, based on the following:
(1) If an existing domestic well provides an
adequate domestic water supply which meets state health standards, and such
well no longer serves as an adequate supply because of the proposed or
permitted appropriation in the vicinity the applicant or permittee shall be
responsible for all costs necessary to provide an adequate supply with the same
quality and quantity as prior to the applicant's or permittee's
interference.
(2) If an existing
well provides an adequate domestic water supply but does not meet state health
standards and such well would no longer serve as an adequate supply because of
the proposed or permitted appropriation in the vicinity, the applicant or
permittee shall be responsible for that portion of costs of providing an
adequate water supply, but shall not be responsible for those costs necessary
to bring the domestic well(s) to state health standards.
B. The complainant shall, within ten days
from the receipt of the notarized written offer, respond to the commissioner in
writing either accepting the offer or making argument on why the offer is not
reasonable. If no response is received from the complainant, within the time
limit, the commissioner shall dismiss the complaint.
C. If the offer is not accepted, the
commissioner shall make a decision based on the written offer and arguments and
available facts, within ten days as follows:
(1) that the applicant or permittee has
submitted a reasonable offer, the commissioner shall issue or continue the
permit involved;
(2) that the
applicant or permittee has not submitted a reasonable offer, the commissioner,
after notice and opportunity for hearing, shall deny, modify, or terminate the
permit involved;
(3) that there is
a need for a public hearing in which case it is ordered.
Statutory Authority: MS s
103G.315;
105.415